Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/653,974

CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 03, 2024
Priority
Feb 21, 2022 — JP 2022-025076 +1 more
Examiner
KRATT, JUSTIN M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
587 granted / 677 resolved
+26.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
711
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
51.2%
+11.2% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 677 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper content of an abstract of the disclosure. A patent abstract is a concise statement of the technical disclosure of the patent and should include that which is new in the art to which the invention pertains. The abstract should not refer to purported merits or speculative applications of the invention and should not compare the invention with the prior art. If the patent is of a basic nature, the entire technical disclosure may be new in the art, and the abstract should be directed to the entire disclosure. If the patent is in the nature of an improvement in an old apparatus, process, product, or composition, the abstract should include the technical disclosure of the improvement. The abstract should also mention by way of example any preferred modifications or alternatives. Where applicable, the abstract should include the following: (1) if a machine or apparatus, its organization and operation; (2) if an article, its method of making; (3) if a chemical compound, its identity and use; (4) if a mixture, its ingredients; (5) if a process, the steps. Extensive mechanical and design details of an apparatus should not be included in the abstract. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. See MPEP § 608.01(b) for guidelines for the preparation of patent abstracts. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the Abstract does not mention that the invention an electrical connector. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: --ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR HAVING A COVER WITH A WATERPROOF SEAL BETWEEN THE ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND COVER--. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kosaka et al. (2020/0274288) in view of ‘6673 (JP3126673U). With regard to claim 1, Kosaka teaches, as shown in figures 1-8 and taught in paragraphs 2, 4, 23, and 42: “A connector 19 comprising: a housing 10 including an accommodating portion 17 that accommodates a connection terminal 16 and a tubular portion 32 having an opening (opening described in paragraph 2) into which a mating connector (taught in paragraph 4) is to be inserted; a cover 12 configured to cover the opening in an openable (shown in figure 2) and closable (shown in figure 3) manner; and an annular packing 13 configured to be attached to one of the cover 12 and the housing and to seal a gap between the tubular portion 15 and the cover 12 at a closed position where the cover 12 closes the opening, wherein: the packing 13 has a first recess 59 formed in a surface on one side in a central axis direction (left-right direction in figure 1) of an annular shape, and a second recess 59 formed in a surface on the other side in the central axis direction; the one of the cover 12 and the housing to which the packing 13 is to be attached includes a first member 53 and a second member 53 that are separately provided… hold the packing therebetween; the first member includes a first protrusion (claw taught in paragraph 42) to be inserted into… the first recess 59; the second member 53 includes a second protrusion (claw taught in paragraph 42) to be inserted into and held by the second recess 59; the packing 13 has a contact surface (right surface of 13 in figure 8), namely one of an inner surface and an outer surface; which comes into contact with the other of the cover and the housing 10 at the closed position; and gaps (shown below) are formed between the packing 13 and side surfaces of the first protrusion and the second protrusion on a contact surface side at an open position where the cover 13 is open”. PNG media_image1.png 396 502 media_image1.png Greyscale Kosaka does not teach the first and second members provided to sandwich the packing therebetween or the first and second protrusions held by the first recess. In the same field of endeavor before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, ‘6673 teaches, as shown in figures 1-4, the first 223 and second 224 members provided to sandwich the packing 23 therebetween and the first 226 and second 227 protrusions held by the first recess (where 226 and 227 are received by 23 in figure 1). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the features of ‘6673 with the invention of Kosaka in order to mount the seal (‘6673, page 4 lines 8-10). With regard to claim 2, Kosaka as modified by ‘6673 teaches: “The connector according to claim 1”, as shown above. Kosaka also teaches, as shown in figures 1-8: “wherein the packing 13 is attached to the cover 12”. With regard to claim 4, Kosaka as modified by ‘6673 teaches: “The connector according to claim 1”, as shown above. ‘6673 also teaches, as shown in figures 1-4: “wherein: the packing 23 includes a first lip portion 232 and a second lip portion 233 arranged side by side in the central axis direction (left-right direction in figure 1); and each of tip ends of the first lip portion 232 and the second lip portion 233 serves as the contact surface”. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the features of ‘6673 with the invention of Kosaka in order to form a seal. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3 and 5 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN M KRATT whose telephone number is (571)270-0277. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdullah A Riyami can be reached at (571)270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN M KRATT/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 03, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744351
GROUNDING DEVICE, GROUNDING UNIT, CONTACT INSERT AND ELECTRICAL PLUG CONNECTOR, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A CONTACT INSERT
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738697
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND MATING ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR WITH OUTER AND INNER SHIELD PORTIONS SURROUNDING HIGH-FREQUENCY TERMINALS
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12725946
RECEPTACLE COUPLER FOR COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
5y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725981
DETACHABLE HEADER HOUSING FOR A HEADER CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY, AND METHOD FOR DISASSEMBLING OR ASSEMBLING THEREOF
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725983
CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY WITH HEAT SINK MOUNTED ON A SHIELDING CAGE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+5.4%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 677 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month