Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/654,142

LID TOP SYMMETRY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 03, 2024
Priority
Sep 19, 2023 — EU 23198196.0
Examiner
ATTEL, NINA KAY
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
The Procter & Gamble Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
41%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
69%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 41% of resolved cases
41%
Career Allowance Rate
246 granted / 594 resolved
-28.6% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
636
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.3%
+14.3% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 594 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 3 is objected to because of the following informalities: In line 1, “the container” should be --the one or more additional pair of active actuators--, and In line 2, “a specific flank” should be --a specific flank of the flanks--. Claim 6 is objected to because of the following informalities: In line 1, “a flank” should be --a flank of the flanks--. Claim 7 is objected to because of the following informalities: In lines 2-3, “each such additional pair a respective additional inactive configuration” should be --each said one or more additional pair of passive and active actuators a respective additional inactivation configuration--, and In line 4, “each additional passive actuator and additional active actuator” should be --each additional passive actuator and additional active actuator of said one or more additional pair of passive and active actuators--. Claim 8 is objected to because of the following informalities: “each inactivation configuration” should be --the inactivation configuration--. Claim 12 is objected to because of the following informalities: In line 1, “the container” should be --the specific actuation area--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 9 recites the limitation “each actuation element” in line 1. However, there is insufficient antecedent basis for an actuation element in the claims. For the purpose of examination, each actuation element will be considered to reference the specific actuation area defined in claim 1. Claim 10 recites the limitation “each actuator”. Claim 1, from which claim 10 depends, defines a single specific active actuator. However, it is not clear whether each actuator is intended to further limit the specific active actuator in claim one or whether each actuator is referring to a different structure component. For the purpose of examination, each actuator will be considered to be reference the specific active actuator defined in claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8 and 11-14 are allowable. Claims 9 and 10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art fails to teach or suggest a box comprising “a specific passive actuator connected to a second portion of the sidewall structure, the specific passive actuator and the specific active actuator being paired to be substantially symmetrically located at 180 degrees from each other around the central axis when the lid is in the closed position, whereby the specific passive actuator is inactivated by a specific inactivation configuration of the lid when the lid is in the closed position, the specific inactivation configuration and the locking tab corresponding to the specific active actuator being substantially symmetrically located at 180 degrees from each other around the central axis”. The closest prior art to Hoefte (WO 2022/173682 A1) only teaches a lock comprising a specific active actuator (303) moveable form a locking position to an opening position by applying an activation pressure onto the specific active actuator when the lid is in the closed position, whereby the specific active actuator abuts against a corresponding locking tab of the lid when in the locking position, the specific active actuator being displaceable by the actuation pressure by an unlocking displacement distance in a direction normal to the specific portion of the sidewall structure, whereby the flanks comprise a specific actuation area (309, 310, 311), the actuation area facing the specific active actuator, the specific actuation area being configured to permit displacing the specific active actuator from the locking position to the opening position by applying the actuation pressure at the specific actuation area when the lid is int eh closed position (FIG. 3A-7B). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Smith et al. (US 10,017291 B2), Garmon (US 4,196,843 A), Baptist (US 4,053,100 A), D’Esposito et al. (US 3,116,007 A), D’Esposito (US 2,711,282 A) and Hammond (US 1,130,271 A). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NINA KAY ATTEL whose telephone number is (571)270-3972. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7AM-4PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Newhouse can be reached at 571-272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NINA K ATTEL/Examiner, Art Unit 3734 /NATHAN J NEWHOUSE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 03, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741779
PACKAGING BOX AND CARDBOARD STRUCTURE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12722883
BAG CONFIGURATION FOR PAIL
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722877
COLLAPSIBLE, REUSABLE BULK SOLID CONTAINER
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12692060
PACKAGING CONTAINER-FILLER MEMBER, PACKAGING CONTAINER, CONTENTS-FILLED PACKAGING CONTAINER, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING CONTENTS-FILLED PACKAGING CONTAINER
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686544
WATER-DEGRADABLE BAG
7y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
41%
Grant Probability
69%
With Interview (+27.8%)
3y 2m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 594 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month