Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/654,871

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED PICKLEBALL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 03, 2024
Priority
May 05, 2023 — provisional 63/500,391
Examiner
GLENN, CHRISTOPHER A.
Art Unit
3711
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
None recorded (individual inventor: Scott Moonen)
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
41%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 41% of resolved cases
41%
Career Allowance Rate
233 granted / 571 resolved
-29.2% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
626
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
53.5%
+13.5% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 571 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 06/23/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 8-9 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gebert (20220347541) in view of Le (20160346627). Regarding claim 8, Gebert (Figures 1-5) teaches a ball, comprising: a single-piece seamless hollow spherical shell (14) (Para. 0012), defining a plurality of uniformly spaced holes (42) in a seamless wall thereof (Para. 0012); wherein the seamless wall comprises a uniform wall thickness (See fig. 2). It is noted that applicant’s specification (para. 0018) discloses: “the pickleball is uniformly round and weighted, having generally uniform wall thickness”. It is noted that Gebert teaches uniform wall thickness as claimed (See fig. 2). If there is any doubt with the teaching of uniform wall thickness by Gebert, the prior art of Le is also being used to teach uniform wall thickness. Gebert does not teach an internal reinforcement structure disposed on an inner surface of the seamless wall of the single-piece seamless hollow spherical shell and extending from the inner surface toward a center of the single-piece seamless hollow spherical shell, the internal reinforcement structure configured to strengthen the seamless wall of the hollow spherical shell, wherein the internal reinforcement structure is a lattice- type pattern of interconnected ribs integrally formed on the inner surface of the seamless wall. Le teaches an internal reinforcement structure (See fig. 3; Para. 0070, 0082, 0191) disposed on an inner surface of the seamless wall of the single-piece seamless hollow spherical shell (Para. 0140) and extending from the inner surface toward a center of the single-piece seamless hollow spherical shell (See Fig. 3b-3c) (Para. 0193-0194), the internal reinforcement structure configured to strengthen the seamless wall of the hollow spherical shell, wherein the internal reinforcement structure is a lattice- type pattern of interconnected ribs (See fig. 3b-3c) integrally formed (Para. 0105) on the inner surface of the seamless wall (Para. 00206) (See fig. 3b-3c); the ball having a seamless wall (Para. 0140); wherein the seamless wall comprises a uniform wall thickness (Para. 0140). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide Gebert with an internal reinforcement structure disposed on an inner surface of the seamless wall as taught by Le as a means of providing a game ball with an internal supporting structure in the form of connected walls or bars (Le: Para. 0140, 0193-0194). Regarding claim 9, the modified Gebert (Figures 1-5) teaches a ball, comprising: a single-piece seamless hollow spherical shell (14) (Para. 0012), defining a plurality of uniformly spaced holes (42) in a wall thereof (Para. 0012). The modified Gebert does not teach the internal reinforcement structure protrudes inward from the inner surface of the seamless wall of the single-piece seamless hollow spherical shell. Le teaches the internal reinforcement structure (See fig. 3; Para. 0070, 0082, 0191) protrudes inward from the inner surface of the seamless wall of the single-piece seamless hollow spherical shell (Para. 0140, 0206) (See fig. 3b-3c). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the modified Gebert with the internal reinforcement structure protrudes inward from the inner surface of the seamless wall as taught by Le as a means of providing a game ball with an internal supporting structure in the form of connected walls or bars (Le: Para. 0140, 0193-0194). Regarding claim 11, the modified Gebert (Figures 1-5) teaches the single piece seamless hollow spherical shell has a smooth outer surface without any weld seams. (Para. 0012). Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gebert in view of Le, further in view of Chen (20170354850). Regarding claim 10, the modified Gebert (Figures 1-5) teaches a ball, comprising: a single-piece seamless hollow spherical shell (14) (Para. 0012), defining a plurality of uniformly spaced holes (42) in a seamless wall thereof (Para. 0012). The modified Gebert does not teach the internal reinforcement structure further comprises a plurality of rim ribs formed around an internal circumferential edge of each of the plurality of holes and extending inward from the inner surface of the wall of the of the spherical shell toward a center of the hollow spherical shell. Chen (Figures 1-5) teaches the internal structure comprises a plurality of rim ribs (Fig. 1-4, Part No. 12, 13) (Para. 0018) formed around an internal circumferential edge of each of the plurality of holes (see fig. 1-5) and extending inward from the inner surface of the wall of the of the spherical shell toward a center of the hollow spherical shell (Para. 0018). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the modified Gebert with the internal reinforcement structure is a plurality of rim ribs as taught by Chen as a means of providing an interior of a hollow ball with ribs to reinforce the structural strength of the ball to prevent the ball from being deformed or distorted due to hitting or treading (Chen: Para. 00018). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 8-11 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER GLENN whose telephone number is (571)272-1277. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, EUGENE KIM can be reached at (571) 272-4463. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.G./Examiner, Art Unit 3711 /JOSEPH B BALDORI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 03, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 17, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12752495
Hockey Stick With Nanofiber Reinforcement
5y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12746443
GAME BOARD FOR CORNHOLE
5y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741195
METHODS FOR USING A MULTI-BALL POCKET ROULETTE SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12691351
SLOPE ESTIMATOR TRAINING APPARATUS AND RELATED METHO
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12667759
GOLF CLUB GRIP ASSEMBLY
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
41%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+37.2%)
2y 7m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 571 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month