Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/655,118

DETACHABLE FLIP-STRAW LID

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
May 03, 2024
Priority
Jan 08, 2024 — provisional 63/618,744
Examiner
NICOLAS, FREDERICK C
Art Unit
3754
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hydrojug Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1046 granted / 1286 resolved
+11.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1304
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
51.8%
+11.8% vs TC avg
§102
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
§112
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1286 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification 2. The specification is objected to as failing to provide proper antecedent basis for the claimed subject matter. See 37 CFR 1.75(d)(1) and MPEP § 608.01(o). Correction of the following is required: a body. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 3. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 4. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 5. Claims 1-2, 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Panicci 4,485,963. Panicci discloses a container lid (18), which comprises a pivotable spout member (28) located on and detachable from a top of the lid as seen in Figures 2 and 4; and a set screw member (56) located on and detachable from a bottom of the lid and configured to engage and releasably attach retain an end of the pivotable spout member within the lid by applying upward force (col. 4, ll. 16-21 and as seen in Figures 2 and 4); a body (26) into which the pivotable spout member and set screw member insert as seen in Figure 2; wherein the set screw member has a channel (52) configured to allow fluids from a container (10) attached to the lid to pass through the set screw member to the pivotable spout member as seen in Figure 2. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 6. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 7. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Panicci 4,485,963 in view of Lowette (WO2020/035595A1). Panicci has taught all the features of the claimed invention except that the channel is configured to connect to a detachable straw member that extends downward from the container lid. Lowette teaches the used of a straw (20) being detachable from a lid (10, 21) as seen in Figure 1. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the application to utilize the teaching of Lowette onto Panicci’s straw to be detachable, in order to allow the cleaning of the straw easily. Allowable Subject Matter 8. Claims 10-18 are allowed. 9. Claims 3-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments 10. Applicants’ arguments with respect to claims 1-18 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion 11. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicants' disclosure. 12. Applicants' amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 13. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FREDERICK C NICOLAS whose telephone number is (571)272-4931. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:00 AM -: 4:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Paul R. Durand can be reached at 571-272-4459. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FREDERICK C NICOLAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3754
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 07, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 16, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 17, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 20, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679619
Packaging Bag With Spout And Method For Producing Packaging Bag With Spout
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679631
POWDER BRIDGING BREAKER
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680854
DISPENSER OF A FLUID SUBSTANCE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662302
Machine For Making Custom Decorative Air Treatment Art
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662303
ACTUATOR BASED PACKAGING FOR USE WITH CARTRIDGE REFILLS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.5%)
2y 5m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1286 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month