Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/656,618

HIGH FREQUENCY MODULE AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 07, 2024
Examiner
MILAKOVICH, NATHAN J
Art Unit
2848
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
543 granted / 699 resolved
+9.7% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
715
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 699 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed May 6, 2024, fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.98(a)(2), which requires a legible copy of each cited foreign patent document; each non-patent literature publication or that portion which caused it to be listed; and all other information or that portion which caused it to be listed. No English translation of the Written Opinion NPL has been provided. The JP language document has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered. Drawings The drawings were received on May 7, 2024. These drawings are acceptable. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 7, 12, and 15-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 20200381336 to Otsubo et al. (hereinafter Otsubo). Claim 1 Otsubo (FIG. 1-3) discloses a high frequency module comprising: a mounting board (2, paragraph 57) that has a first main surface (20a) opposite to a second main surface (20b); a power amplifier (3b, paragraph 59) that is disposed on a main surface of either the first main surface (20a) or the second main surface (20b) of the mounting board (2); an electronic component (3a, paragraph 59) that is disposed on the main surface of the mounting board (2) on which the power amplifier (3b) is disposed; and a resin layer (4, paragraph 57) that is disposed at least between the power amplifier (3b) and the electronic component (3a) in a plan view from a thickness direction of the mounting board (2), wherein the power amplifier (3b) has a third main surface opposite to a fourth main surface in the thickness direction of the mounting board (2), the fourth main surface of the power amplifier (3b) is provided between the third main surface of the power amplifier (3b) and the main surface of the mounting board (2) on which the power amplifier (3b) is disposed, a groove portion (13) is formed at least between the power amplifier (3b) and the electronic component (3a), in the resin layer (4), and the groove portion (13) includes a bottom portion positioned between the third main surface of the power amplifier (3b) and the main surface of the mounting board (2) when the mounting board (2) is viewed from a direction orthogonal to the thickness direction of the mounting board (2)(FIG. 3). Claim 2 Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 1, wherein a length of the groove portion (13) is longer than a length of the power amplifier (3b) along a direction in which the groove portion (13) extends, in a plan view from the thickness direction of the mounting board (2)(FIG. 2, paragraph 66: groove along edge of recess 11). Claim 7 Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 1, wherein a diameter of the bottom portion of the groove portion (13) is smaller than a diameter of an opening surface of the groove portion (13)(FIG. 3). Claim 12 Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 1, wherein the resin layer (4) is provided to cover the electronic component (3a), the high frequency module further comprises an electronic component side shield portion (5, paragraph 61) that covers at least a part of the resin layer (4), the electronic component side shield portion (5) has at least an electronic component side first shield surface (above 3a) and an electronic component side second shield surface (in 13), the electronic component side first shield surface (above 3a) overlaps the electronic component (3a) in a plan view from the thickness direction of the mounting board (2), and the electronic component side second shield surface covers (in 13), among a first side wall and a second side wall of the resin layer (4) that faces the first side wall in a direction in which the power amplifier (3b) and the electronic component (3a) are arranged and that form the groove portion (13), the second side wall that is closer to the electronic component (3a) than the first side wall (as shown in FIG. 3). Claim 15 Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 1, wherein the mounting board (2) includes a first ground terminal and a second ground terminal that are connected to a ground (paragraph 58, 61), the first ground terminal (connections 9 at bottom of 3b) is connected to the power amplifier (3b), and a path, which connects the first ground terminal and the power amplifier (3b), does not overlap the groove portion (13) in a plan view from the thickness direction of the mounting board (2)(FIG. 3). Claim 16 Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 15, wherein the second ground terminal (connections 9 at bottom of 3a) is connected to the electronic component (3a), and a path, which connects the second ground terminal and the electronic component (3a), does not overlap the groove portion (13) in the plan view from the thickness direction of the mounting board (2)(FIG. 3). Claim 17 Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 1, wherein the electronic component (3a) is a transmission electronic component (3a) related to transmission of a transmission signal (paragraph 57). Claim 18 Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 1, wherein the electronic component (3a) is a reception electronic component (3a) related to reception of a reception signal (paragraph 57). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 3-6, 13, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Otsubo. Claim 3 Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 1, wherein the high frequency module further comprises a power amplifier side shield portion (5, paragraph 61) that covers at least a part of the resin layer (4), the power amplifier side shield portion (5) has at least a power amplifier side first shield surface (upper) and a power amplifier side second shield surface (in 13), the power amplifier side first shield surface (upper) overlaps the power amplifier (3b) in a plan view from the thickness direction of the mounting board (2), and the power amplifier side second shield (in 13) surface covers, among a first side wall and a second side wall of the resin layer (4) that faces the first side wall in a direction in which the power amplifier (3b) and the electronic component (3a) are arranged and that form the groove portion (13), the first side wall that is closer to the power amplifier (3b) than the second wall (as shown in FIG. 3). Otsubo does not expressly disclose in FIG. 3 the resin layer is provided to cover the power amplifier. Otsubo does, however, teach that the resin may cover the power amplifier (paragraph 90). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to cover the power amplifier with the resin layer as taught by Otsubo in the arrangement disclosed in FIG. 3, as one having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do this with a reasonable expectation of success because such a combination and/or modification allows for less precision required in forming the resin layer to ensure the top portion of the power amplifier is evenly exposed. Additionally, additional resin provides a greater thermal mass and allows for additional protection and shielding of the power amplifier while avoiding thermal mismatch around the power amplifier to avoid crack formation. Claim 4 Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 3, as shown above. Otsubo does not expressly disclose in FIG. 3 a connection part between the power amplifier side first shield surface and the power amplifier side second shield surface is formed in an R shape (a radius), as recited in claim 4. Such a claimed arrangement, however, is a mere design choice, obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, as such a rearrangement would not have modified the operation of the device. See MPEP 2144 VI.C. citing In re Japikse, 181 F.2d 1019, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950). Additionally, rounding corners of elements is a routine design expedient to avoid stress concentration. Claim 5 Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 3, as shown above. Otsubo does not expressly disclose in FIG. 3 a thickness of the power amplifier side second shield surface is smaller than a thickness of the power amplifier side first shield surface, as recited in claim 5. Such a claimed arrangement, however, is a mere design choice, obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, as such a rearrangement would not have modified the operation of the device. See MPEP 2144 VI.C. citing In re Japikse, 181 F.2d 1019, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950). Claim 6 Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 1, as shown above. Otsubo does not expressly disclose in FIG. 3 the bottom portion of the groove portion is positioned between the fourth main surface of the power amplifier and the main surface of the mounting board when the mounting board is viewed from the direction orthogonal to the thickness direction of the mounting board (see FIG. 3 in at least the groove appears to be at the same level of the bottom surface of the power amplifier). Such a claimed arrangement, however, is a mere design choice, obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, as such a rearrangement would not have modified the operation of the device. See MPEP 2144 VI.C. citing In re Japikse, 181 F.2d 1019, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950). Claim 13 Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 12, as shown above. Otsubo does not expressly disclose in FIG. 3 a connection part between the electronic component side first shield surface and the electronic component side second shield surface is formed in an R shape (a radius), as recited in claim 13. Such a claimed arrangement, however, is a mere design choice, obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, as such a rearrangement would not have modified the operation of the device. See MPEP 2144 VI.C. citing In re Japikse, 181 F.2d 1019, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950). Additionally, rounding corners of elements is a routine design expedient to avoid stress concentration. Claim 19 Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 1, as shown above. Otsubo does not expressly disclose in FIG. 3 among a first side wall and a second side wall of the resin layer that faces the first side wall in a direction in which the power amplifier and the electronic component are arranged and that form the groove portion, a thickness of the first side wall that is closer to the power amplifier is smaller than a thickness of the second side wall that is closer to the electronic component among the first side wall and the second side wall, as recited in claim 19. Such a claimed arrangement, however, is a mere design choice, obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, as such a rearrangement would not have modified the operation of the device. See MPEP 2144 VI.C. citing In re Japikse, 181 F.2d 1019, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950). Claims 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Otsubo in view of US 2020/0020645 to Nakajima. Claim 9 Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 1, as shown above. Otsubo does not expressly disclose a second power amplifier, which is different from a first power amplifier, as the power amplifier, wherein the second power amplifier is disposed on the main surface of the mounting board on which the first power amplifier is disposed and is disposed on a side of the first power amplifier with respect to the groove portion, as recited in claim 9. Nakajima (FIG. 2a) teaches a second power amplifier (32, paragraph 37), which is different from a first power amplifier (31), as the power amplifier, wherein the second power amplifier (32) is disposed on a main surface of a mounting board (20) on which the first power amplifier (31) is disposed and is disposed on a side of the first power amplifier with respect to the groove portion. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of Nakajima with Otsubo to incorporate an additional power amplifier separated from a first power amplifier as taught by Nakajima in the module of Otsubo, as one having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do this with a reasonable expectation of success because such a combination and/or modification allows for separating high power amplified signals from low noise amplified signals while shielding sensitive components from the heat generated by both. Claim 10 Otsubo with Nakajima teaches the high frequency module according to claim 9, wherein the resin layer (Otsubo 4, Nakajima 50) is provided to cover the first power amplifier (Nakajima 31) and the second power amplifier (32; see FIG. 2B), and a second groove portion (as above regarding claim 1), which is different from a first groove portion, is provided between the first power amplifier and the second power amplifier in the resin layer as the groove portion (as taught by Otsubo in view of Nakajima), in a plan view from the thickness direction of the mounting board (see Nakajima FIG. 2A: separate shielding slits 600 between regions of module). Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Otsubo in view of US 20220053631 to Kang et al. (hereinafter Kang). Otsubo discloses the high frequency module according to claim 1, as shown above. Otsubo does not expressly disclose a communication device comprising: a signal processing circuit that processes a high frequency signal passing through the high frequency module, as recited in claim 20. Kang (FIG. 1) teaches a signal processing circuit that processes a high frequency signal (paragraph 25). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of Otsubo with Kang to incorporate the high frequency module of Otsubo in the structure taught by Kang, as one having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do this with a reasonable expectation of success because such a combination and/or modification allows for improved electromagnetic shielding as taught by Kang (paragraph 76) while avoiding the effects of heat generation by an amplifier on sensitive components as taught by Otsubo (paragraph 7). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8, 11, and 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claims 8 and 11 each include allowable subject matter, in at least Otsubo discloses surrounding the sensitive component with a groove (see, e.g., FIG. 2) rather than surrounding a power amplifier with a groove. Claim 14 includes allowable subject matter, in at least Otsubo discloses connecting the power amplifier to the shielding layer (see FIG. 3) for improved heat dissipation and noise grounding rather than connecting the electronic component to the shielding layer. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHAN MILAKOVICH whose telephone number is (571) 270-3087. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Dole can be reached at (571) 272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHAN MILAKOVICH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2848
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603226
MULTILAYERED CAPACITOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604404
CIRCUIT BOARD WELD STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603223
MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597565
MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12579914
WINDING-TYPE DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETECTING LIGHT EMISSION INFORMATION OF WINDING-TYPE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+19.3%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 699 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month