Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/656,823

MECHANICAL WIRE LUG CLAMPING

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 07, 2024
Examiner
PAUMEN, GARY F
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Schneider Electric SE
OA Round
2 (Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1760 granted / 1986 resolved
+28.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-1.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1999
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§102
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1986 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 35 USC 102 Rejections The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Grunwald 8932089. Regarding claim 18, Grunwald (front page) discloses a screw for a mechanical lug, the screw comprising: a wire binding screw (WBS) body 4 extending along a screw axis with male threads winding helically around the screw axis configured to be engaged to female threads of a WBS bore in the mechanical lug, wherein the WBS body includes an axial end face; and wherein: the screw is configured to clamp a wire between the axial end face and clamping surfaces of the mechanical lug, wherein the axial end face includes a circumferential rim (unnumbered, lower face of 4) extending around the screw axis surrounding an end pocket 6 defined in the axial end face, wherein the circumferential rim and the end pocket are configured to deform a section of the wire in the mechanical lug so that the circumferential rim presses into the wire and a portion of the wire presses into the end pocket to secure the wire in the mechanical lug against loosening of preloading on the wire. Note that only the screw per se, not any portion of the lug, is being positively recited, and thus Grunwald is deemed to disclose the positively recited structure. Regarding claim 19, Grunwald discloses the end pocket 6 defines a conical surface extending inward into the WBS body 4 from the axial end face along the screw axis. Regarding claim 20, Grunwald discloses a driving end 16 of the WBS body opposite the axial end face defines a driver receptacle 12 configured to receive a driver tool for turning the WBS body about the screw axis. Claims Defining Over Prior Art Claims 1-4, 6-13, 15-17, 21 and 22 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: none of the prior art discloses or teaches the clamping surfaces converging in a direction away from the WBS bore and the pair of surfaces converging in a direction toward the WBS bore; in combination with the rest of the subject matter of the respective independent claim. Response To Arguments Applicant's arguments filed September 14, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Grunwald, as noted above, discloses the claimed structure of the screw per se in claims 18-20. Finality Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GARY F PAUMEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2013. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koehler can be reached at 571-272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GARY F PAUMEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 14, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749854
MIDDLE CLAMPING PIECE AND HIGH-SPEED CONNECTOR
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749853
CONNECTOR, CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749834
Connecting Element and Device Arrangement
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749833
Port Cage Retention
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749839
CONNECTOR SYSTEM FOR USE IN A POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (-1.4%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1986 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month