Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/656,873

TOOL SHAFT COMBINATION STRUCTURE OF POWER TOOL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 07, 2024
Priority
May 15, 2023 — TW 112204770
Examiner
NEJAD, MAHDI H
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Basso Industry Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
466 granted / 631 resolved
+3.9% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
661
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
44.1%
+4.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
§112
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 631 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on Application TW112204770 dated 05/15/2023 and applicant has filed a certified copy of this application on 06/18/2015. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 8 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cheng (DE 202012100524 U1) in view of Rhinevault (US 2162359 A). Regarding claim 1, Cheng teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. below) a tool shaft combination structure of power tool (see power tool in Fig. 6), used for being inserted to a screwdriver bit (see screw driver bit in Fig. 6) whose outer surface comprises a groove, comprising: an adaptor head (chuck 50), comprising a seat, a connecting sleeve extended from the seat, an inserting hole and a rolling ball trench (opening 25), the inserting hole being disposed in the connecting sleeve and extended into the seat, and the rolling ball trench being disposed an outer surface of the seat and communicating with the inserting hole; multiple rolling balls, movably (radially moveable) accommodated in the rolling ball trench, (ring 54), movably covered outside the seat (compare Figs. 7, 8), comprising a blocking block (57) and a buffering trench (trench where spring 35 is inserted into), moving relative to the seat (compare Figs. 7, 8) to make the (ring 53), flexibly pressing the rear rolling ball. PNG media_image1.png 873 1087 media_image1.png Greyscale Rhinevault teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. below) a tool shaft combination that can be used in a power tool, comprising: a ball trench, a lower rolling ball and a front upper rolling ball and a rear upper rolling ball. PNG media_image2.png 764 541 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to use ball locking mechanism of Rhinevault in tool of Cheng to make it capable of connecting separate pieces by two adjacent ball detent sections. Regarding claim 8, Cheng teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above) an outer sleeve placed around the sleeve. Regarding claim 10, Cheng teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above) the flexible ring is multiple in number, and the multiple flexible rings connectively press the rear rolling ball. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7, 9 and 11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAHDI H NEJAD whose telephone number is (571)270-0464. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30am-4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Posigian can be reached at (313) 446-6546. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MAHDI H. NEJAD Examiner Art Unit 3723 /MAHDI H NEJAD/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703112
ROBOT HAND
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698188
LOAD-SENSING VEHICLE LIFT
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691359
EDGE SHARPENING TOOL FOR ACRYLIC WAX SCRAPER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692138
PNEUMATIC DISMANTLING DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692139
HYDRAULIC JACK ASSEMBLIES
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.1%)
2y 10m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 631 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month