Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/656,897

SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO CONNECT CARE SEEKERS WITH CARE PROVIDERS FOR CARETAKING NEEDS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
May 07, 2024
Examiner
SHIH, HAOSHIAN
Art Unit
2179
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Helpr Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
375 granted / 545 resolved
+13.8% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
565
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
53.1%
+13.1% vs TC avg
§102
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
§112
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 545 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 are pending in this application and have been examined in response to application filed on 05/07/2024. CONTINUING DATA This application is a CON of 18/183,028 03/13/2023 PAT 11984229 18/183,028 is a CON of 16/583,745 09/26/2019 PAT 11715570 Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1-10, 12 and 14-20 of US PAT. No. 11984229. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. See table below: Instant Application US PAT. No. 11984229 Claim 1 Claim 1 Claim 2 Claim 2 Claim 3 Claim 3 Claim 4 Claim 4 Claim 5 Claim 5 Claim 6 Claim 6 Claim 7 Claim 7 Claim 8 Claim 8 Claim 9 Claim 9 Claim 10 Claim 10 Claim 11 Claim 7 Claim 12 Claim 12 Claim 13 Claim 2 Claim 14 Claim 14 Claim 15 Claim 15 Claim 16 Claim 16 Claim 17 Claim 17 Claim 18 Claim 18 Claim 19 Claim 19 Claim 20 Claim 20 This is a double patenting only rejection because the parent case is patented, applicant may overcome the double patenting rejection by filing a terminal disclaimer. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAOSHIAN SHIH whose telephone number is (571)270-1257. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, FRED EHICHIOYA can be reached at (571) 272-4034. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HAOSHIAN SHIH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2179
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597186
SYNTHESIZING SHADOWS IN DIGITAL IMAGES UTILIZING DIFFUSION MODELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591329
REDUCED-SIZE INTERFACES FOR MANAGING ALERTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578832
DISTANCE-BASED USER INTERFACES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572325
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PLAYING SOUND EFFECTS OF MUSIC
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12561039
GENERATIVE MODEL WITH WHITEBOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+21.0%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 545 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month