Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/656,989

ELECTRODE SET AND DEVICE FOR TRANSPARENTIZING BIOLOGICAL TISSUE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
May 07, 2024
Priority
May 25, 2023 — TW 112119473
Examiner
NOGUEROLA, ALEXANDER STEPHAN
Art Unit
1795
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
National Tsing Hua University
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
1277 granted / 1545 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1557
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
§112
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1545 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Rejections pending since the Office Action mailed on February 17, 2016 All of the rejections under 35 U.S.C 112(b) are withdrawn. 2. All of the rejections under 35 U.S.C 103 are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Note that dependent claims will have the deficiencies of base and intervening claims. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention: a) claim 2 requires “. . . ., wherein the carrier metal is titanium, and the coating metal is iridium. [underlining by the Examiner]” However, underlying claim 1 requires, “. . . ., and wherein the coating metal is a metal oxide.”1 Thus, claim 2 is indefinite because it is not consistent with claim 1; and b) claim 12 requires “. . . ., wherein the carrier metal is titanium, and the coating metal is iridium. [underlining by the Examiner]” However, underlying claim 8 requires, “. . . ., and wherein the coating metal is a metal oxide.”2 Thus, claim 12 is indefinite because it is not consistent with claim 8. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3, 5-11, 13, and 15-17 are allowed. Claims 2 and 12 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: see Applicant’s Remarks in the Amendment of May 15, 2026 and see Allowable Subject Matter on pages 28-30 of the non-final Office Action mailed on February 17, 2026 . Final Rejection Applicant's amendment necessitated the new grounds of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER STEPHAN NOGUEROLA whose telephone number is (571)272-1343. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday 9:00AM-5:30 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Luan Van can be reached on 571 272-8521. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDER S NOGUEROLA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1795 1 Note that this feature makes claim 1 allowable. Similarly, for claim 8. 2 Note that this feature makes claim 1 allowable. Similarly, for claim 8.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 07, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 15, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680977
DETACHABLE ELECTRODE HOLDER AND ELECTROPHORESIS DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674775
NON-REAGENT CHLORIDE ANALYSIS IN ACID COPPER PLATING BATHS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674777
GAS SENSOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12650404
Thiosulfate Sensor
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12650403
SENSOR AND SEAL FOR SENSOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+2.9%)
2y 8m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1545 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month