Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/657,015

PLASMA DIAGNOSIS DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF PLASMA DIAGNOSIS DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 07, 2024
Examiner
AURORA, REENA
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
1010 granted / 1161 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -14% lift
Without
With
+-14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1191
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
§102
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§112
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1161 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3 – 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3 recites the limitation "the measuring unit" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is unclear whether the applicant is referring to the limitation “a conductive measuring unit” as claimed in claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As to claims 1 – 2 and 7 - 11, the prior art fails to show a probe structure which includes a protective layer that has a first face configured to be exposed to a plasma established within the process chamber during a plasma process, a second face opposite to the first face, and an outer wall connecting the first face and the second face inside the process chamber, and a conductive measuring unit spaced part from the first face of the protective layer and configured to measure a status of the plasma; and a wafer on a periphery of the probe structure and in contact with the outer wall of the protective layer, wherein the wafer and the protective layer include materials different from each other. These features taken together with the other limitations of the claim renders the claims allowable over prior art. Claims 4 - 6 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. As to claims 12 – 17, the prior art fails to show a probe structure which includes a silicon oxide layer inside the process chamber and has a first face configured to be exposed to a plasma established within the process chamber during a plasma process and a second face opposite to the first face, and a measuring unit spaced apart from the first face of the probe structure in a first direction parallel to the first face of the probe structure and configured to measure a status of the plasma; an alternating current power supply unit configured to a signal to the probe structure; and a silicon (Si) wafer on a periphery of the probe structure and in contact with side walls of the silicon oxide layer, wherein the measuring unit of the probe structure includes a first measuring unit to which a first signal is applied from the alternating current power supply unit, and a second measuring unit to which a second signal different from the first signal is applied from the alternating current power supply unit. These features taken together with the other limitations of the claim renders the claims allowable over prior art. As to claims 18 – 20, the prior art fails to show a probe structure including a protective layer including a first face configured to be exposed to plasma established during a plasma process and a second face opposite the first face, and a measuring unit on the second face of the protective layer and configured to transmit the electrical signal supplied from the alternating current power supply unit to the plasma; a silicon (Si) wafer bonded to side walls of the protective layer, and having a same cross-sectional thickness as a cross-sectional thickness of the protective layer; a current measuring unit configured to measure a current flowing through the measuring unit of the probe structure as a function of a potential difference between the plasma and the measuring unit of the probe structure; and a plasma analysis unit configured to analyze one or more parameters relating to a status of the plasma as a function of the current measured by the current measuring unit. These features taken together with the other limitations of the claim renders the claims allowable over prior art. Prior Art of Record The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant s disclosure. Blalock (6,952,108) is cited for its disclosure of methods for fabricating plasma probes. Renken et al. (7,135,852) is cited for its disclosure of integrated process condition sensing wafer and data analysis system. Tatsumi et al. (2009/0058424) is cited for its disclosure of plasma monitoring method and plasma monitoring system. Gosselin (9,017,513) is cited for its disclosure of plasma monitoring probe assembly and processing chamber incorporating the same. Jensen et al. (2018/0114681) is cited for its disclosure of a process condition sensing device and method for plasma chamber. Kwon et al. (12,315,710) is cited for its disclosure of a plasma diagnosis system and plasma diagnosis method. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REENA AURORA whose telephone number is (571)272-2263. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8:00AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lee Rodak can be reached at 5712705628. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REENA AURORA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601613
SENSOR ARRANGEMENT HAVING A DUAL MAGNET
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601794
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN ORIENTATION OF A MAGNET, AND A JOYSTICK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601763
CURRENT SENSOR WITH ADJACENT CONDUCTOR REJECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596335
RELAY DRIVE SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596160
MAGNETIC SENSING DEVICE AND MAGNETIC SENSING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (-14.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1161 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month