Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/657,103

OVEN RACK

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 07, 2024
Examiner
TEFERA, HIWOT E
Art Unit
3637
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
596 granted / 804 resolved
+22.1% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
841
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§112
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 804 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 1. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 2. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Patent 3,789,826 (Baltz) in further in view of US Patent 6,390,310 B1 (Insalaco). With respect to claim 1, Baltz shows an oven rack (15, Fig.1), comprising: a plurality of support members (34, FIg.1) to support an object thereupon; a rear brace (32, FIg.1) connected to rear portions of the plurality of support members such that the rear brace (32) is disposed perpendicularly with respect to the plurality of support members (34); a front brace (31, Fig.1) connected to front portions of the plurality of support members (34) such that the front brace (31) is disposed perpendicularly with respect to the plurality of support members (34, Fig.1). With respect to claim 1, Baltz doesn’t show a guard portion connected to the front portions of the support members. Insalaco shows a guard portion (62, Fig.1, FIg.3) connected to the front portions of the plurality of support members (50, via front brace 48 and hinge 60), the guard portion (62) comprising: a plurality of curved portions (68, at 106 in Fig.4 and Fig.6) having a semicircular shape such that the plurality of curved portions (68) are connected to the front portions of the plurality of support members (50) at first ends thereof (via front brace 48 and hinge 60, Fig.6), a lateral front guard (100, Fig.4) connected to second ends of the plurality of the plurality of curved portions (68), such that the lateral front guard (100) extends perpendicularly across the second ends of the plurality of the plurality of curved portions (68, FIg.4), and a plurality of hinges (60) disposed across the front brace (48, Fig.4, FIg.6) to hingedly connect each of the plurality of curved portions (68) to the plurality of support members (50, FIg.4, Fig.6). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to include a guard portion to the front of the rack of Baltz, such as taught by Insalaco, in order to prevent items on the rack from falling off the rack. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 3 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 1/17/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. With respect to applicant’s arguments that the pair of mounting blocks 60 in Insalaco are not hinges but instead are merely mounting blocks and therefore not comparable to the plurality of hinges disposed across the front brace of applicant’s invention, the examiner respectfully disagrees. First examiner notes that the figures in applicant’s invention do not clearly depict hinges 175, the figures 1A and 1B in applicant’s drawings merely point to a meeting point of the curved portions of the guard portion and the front brace of the rack and do not show what the hinges look like and thus the examiner cannot see how applicant’s hinges are different from that of the prior art’s hinges. Secondly, the mounting blocks 60 in Insalaco are considered hinges because they pivotably support the curved portions to the front of the rack. The definition of a hinge is “a jointed device on which a door, lid, or other swinging part turns” (merriam-webster dictionary) in this case each curved portion (68) swing from the respective mounting block (60, FIg.3, Fig.4, Fig.5) between two positions and thus the mounting blocks are considered hinges. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HIWOT E TEFERA whose telephone number is (571)270-3320. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Troy can be reached at 5712703742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HIWOT E TEFERA/Examiner, Art Unit 3637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 07, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 17, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599230
STORAGE CABINET FOR DANCING MIRROR WITH ENLARGED DISPLAY SCREEN AND AUDIO
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595878
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590755
MULLION GUIDE ELEMENT FOR A REFRIGERATOR APPLIANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584680
DOOR SUPPORT FEATURE OF A REFRIGERATION UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584339
FURNITURE DRIVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.1%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 804 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month