Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/657,116

ANIMAL WASTE STORAGE DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 07, 2024
Priority
May 08, 2023 — provisional 63/500,652
Examiner
CASTELLANO, STEPHEN J
Art Unit
3733
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Balloon Innovations Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allowance Rate
795 granted / 1225 resolved
-5.1% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1259
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
70.6%
+30.6% vs TC avg
§102
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1225 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-7, 10-16 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bell (US 2006/0125255) in view of Denham et al. (US 2004/0189026) (Denham). Bell discloses an animal waste storage device comprising: a collection body having an adapter (projection 17 with aperture 15) configured to secure a rotatable fastener (clip 13 is a fastener rotatably coupled and the fastener is capable of rotation), and an integral handle (11) positioned on the opposing side of the collection body from the adapter, wherein the handle extends along the length of the collection body; a first end-cap (lid 5) securable to the first terminal end of the collection body; and wherein said collection body is configured to temporarily secure a bag containing animal waste within a collection channel for later disposal (the purpose of first chamber 19 [see Fig. 2] is clearly stated in paragraph [41], second and third sentences, i.e., of sufficient size to store one or more used bags containing feces). The handle of Bell is not attached at approximately the terminal ends of the body. Denham teaches a similarly constructed pet waste collection container having a handle attached at approximately the first and second terminal ends of the body. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to extend the length of Bell’s handle and attach the handle ends to respective terminal ends of the body to provide more leverage and control of the waste storage device when reorienting and carrying the device. Re claims 2 and 11, further comprising a partition surface (23) positioned within said collection channel separating the collection body into at least two separate compartments (see Fig. 2 of Bell). Re claims 3 and 12, one of the compartments (first chamber 19 of Bell) is configured to secure the bag containing animal waste (see Fig. 2 and paragraph [41], second and third sentences). Re claims 4 and 13, one of the compartments (second chamber 21 of Bell) is configured to secure excess bags for collecting animal waste (see Fig. 2 and paragraph [41], first sentence). Re claims 5 and 14, further comprising wherein the collection body comprises a second end-cap (lid 7 of Bell) secured to each the second terminal end of the collection body. Re claims 6 and 15, further comprising an animal leash (lead mentioned in paragraph [39] is a leash attached to clip 13 of Bell) securable to the fastener and/or the adapter. Re claims 7 and 16, said animal waste storage device comprises a plastic animal waste storage device (see first sentence of paragraph [43] of Bell). Re claims 10 and 20, the waste bag is provided as clearly stated in paragraph [41] of Bell. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Bell and Denham. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN J CASTELLANO whose telephone number is (571)272-4535. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Jenness can be reached at 571-270-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. sjc/STEPHEN J CASTELLANO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 07, 2024
Application Filed
May 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 01, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630334
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INTERCONNECTABLE BUILDING BLOCK CONTAINER TOYS CAPABLE OF STORING ITEMS
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624888
PROCESSING OF CORE MATERIAL IN A VACUUM INSULATED STRUCTURE
2y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623531
INTERNAL REINFORCEMENT ELEMENT FOR A TANK MADE OF PLASTIC FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE
1y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12612210
REINFORCEMENT FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE TANK
2y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12606368
TANK FOR TRANSPORTING LIQUIDS
1y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+36.1%)
3y 0m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1225 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month