Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/657,171

METHOD OF OPERATING A RADAR SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 07, 2024
Priority
May 12, 2023 — EU 23173186.0
Examiner
SERAYDARYAN, HELENA H
Art Unit
3645
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
NXP Semiconductors N.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
211 granted / 306 resolved
+17.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
319
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
78.1%
+38.1% vs TC avg
§102
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
§112
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 306 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 16-27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 16 and 22 recite the limitation "the in-phase" in line 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims. Also, the term “in-band” in claims is not an accurate term in the given scope of the claims. It should be changed to “in-phase” as “in-band” has completely different meaning. The dependent claims are rejected based on their dependence on the rejected independent claims 1 and 22. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16-27 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the Examiner has not found any prior art that would render obvious the claim limitations directed to “determining a first phase amount corresponding to a phase shift required to cause an amplitude of the in-phase signal to equal an amplitude of the quadrature signal; phase-shifting the reflected radar signal by the first phase amount; and amplifying the in-band signal and the quadrature signal after phase-shifting the reflected radar signal by the first phase amount.” The closes references found are US 9285461 B2 and CN 101048673 A. Reference US 9285461 B2 teaches obtaining in-phase and quadrature components of signal and changing the phase of the quadrature signal by 90 degrees to obtain a circularly polarized signal, then amplifying the in-phase and quadrature signals by different amounts before transmitting them. It however does not teach “determining a first phase amount corresponding to a phase shift required to cause an amplitude of the in-phase signal to equal an amplitude of the quadrature signal; phase-shifting the reflected radar signal by the first phase amount; and amplifying the in-band signal and the quadrature signal after phase-shifting the reflected radar signal by the first phase amount.” The reference CN 101048673 A teaches comparing in-phase and quadrature components of the received signals to avoid collision with other objects. However, the reference also does not teach the above-mentioned limitations. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HELENA SERAYDARYAN whose telephone number is (571)270-0706. The examiner can normally be reached on M-T, 7:30-5pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Resha Desai can be reached on (571)270-7792. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HELENA H SERAYDARYAN/ Examiner, Art Unit 3648 /RESHA DESAI/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 07, 2024
Application Filed
May 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681145
TEST ASSEMBLY AND METHOD FOR TESTING A RADAR SENSOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674878
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SENSING DISTANCE AND/OR MOVEMENT
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669579
METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIA FOR PHASE-CONJUGATE RADAR TARGET EMULATION FOR TESTING DUAL SIDEBAND (DSB) FREQUENCY MODULATED CONTINUOUS WAVE (FMCW) RADARS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663508
SIGNAL PROCESSING APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656474
Radar system for controlling accesses to an environment
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+12.9%)
3y 5m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 306 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month