Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/657,972

DISTRIBUTED UNIT, CENTRAL UNIT, AND METHOD FOR ADDITION OF ACTIVATED OR DORMANT SECONDARY CELL

Final Rejection §112
Filed
May 08, 2024
Priority
Nov 02, 2018 — JP 2018-207415 +2 more
Examiner
KASRAIAN, ALLAHYAR
Art Unit
2642
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
3 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
470 granted / 638 resolved
+11.7% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
659
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
68.5%
+28.5% vs TC avg
§102
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 638 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Remarks The present Office Action is in response to Applicant’s amendment filed on 03/23/2026. Claims 1-40 are still pending in the present application. This Action is made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim(s) 39 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 39 recites, “wherein the first IE indicates whether a secondary cell (SCell) is to be in an activated state or a deactivated state, depending on whether the first IE comprises a second IE”. However, the current specification does not support the limitation. Applicant is welcomed to point out to the part(s) of the specification that provides support for the limitation(s). The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 1-9, 19-27 and 37 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Independent claims 1, 19 and 37 recite, “wherein the first IE indicates whether a secondary cell (SCell) is to be in an activated state or a deactivated state, depending on whether the first IE.” However, the limitation(s) is/are incomplete and vague. Claim(s) 2-9 and 20-27 is/are also rejected by the virtue of it/their dependency on claim(s) 1 and 19. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10-18, 8-36, 38 and 40 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-9, 19-27, 37 and 39 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference/rejection applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant’s disclosure. UEMURA et al. -US 20160157219 A1- disclose TERMINAL APPARATUS, BASE STATION APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD, AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALLAHYAR KASRAIA N whose telephone number is (571)270-1772. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 5: 00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, RAFAEL PEREZ-GUTIERREZ can be reached at (571)272-7915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALLAHYAR KASRAIA N/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 08, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 10, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 23, 2026
Response Filed
May 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684429
TEARING DOWN A PACKET DATA SESSION AFTER A TRANSITION TO A DIFFERENT SUBSCRIPTION OF A DUAL SUBSCRIBER IDENTITY MODULE DUAL STANDBY USER EQUIPMENT
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684444
CONVERGED NETWORK SERVICE CONTINUITY METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677201
COMMUNICATION METHOD FOR ACCESS CONTROL AND ASSOCIATED COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, MEDIUM, AND CHIP
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677258
RESOURCE ATTRIBUTE CONFIGURING METHOD, RESOURCE ATTRIBUTE DETERMINING METHOD, COMMUNICATION NODE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677208
MANAGING UE MEASUREMENTS IN AN IDLE OR INACTIVE STATE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+21.2%)
3y 2m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 638 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month