Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/658,106

THERMAL RUNAWAY DETECTION CIRCUIT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 08, 2024
Priority
May 09, 2023 — EU 23172466.7
Examiner
RUTISER, CLAIRE A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Volvo Group
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
42%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
64%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 42% of resolved cases
42%
Career Allowance Rate
69 granted / 165 resolved
-18.2% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
214
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§103
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§102
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 165 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1-20, as filed 8 May 2024, are examined herein. No new matter is included. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 5-6, and 8-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hilligoss (US 20220077507 A1). Regarding claim 1, Hilligoss teaches a thermal runaway detection circuit ([0015] “detect a thermal event occurring in one of the plurality of cells”) comprising a processing circuit, ([0115] battery management unit) a first electric conduit configured to connect the processing circuit to a first sensor circuit and a second electric conduit configured to connect the processing circuit to a second sensor circuit, a portion of the first electric conduit and a portion of the second electric conduit between the processing circuit and the respective sensor circuit are configured to be arranged at an over pressure relief path of a battery device, (FIG. 11 and [0110] trace circuits 62A, 62B; “one leg of the trace circuits crosses the vent holes 60 in the laminated busbar, similarly .. one leg of the trace circuits 62B crosses the vent holes 60…. Both trace circuits are connected to a respective monitoring circuit.” At [0111] “each monitoring circuit comprises voltage monitor VMA, VMB. At [0113] “FIG. 12 shows an example of the voltages which would be seen by voltage monitors VMA and VMB if one of the battery cells vented, causing one of the traces to sever…. provide an indication of a thermal runaway event.) wherein the processing circuit is configured to: obtain first data via the first electric conduit and second data via the second electric conduit, and (FIG. 8 and [0120] “output of resistance measurement unit 78 is connected to an input of comparator 80.”) generate a thermal runaway indication based on the first data and the second data. (FIG. 13 resistance measurement 78, alarm 68, [0114] “detecting … when both trace circuits have severed” [0139] “provide an indication of a thermal runaway event”, [0017] produce an alarm signal) Regarding claim 2, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches wherein the processing circuit is configured to generate the thermal runaway indication responsive to the first data being outside a first interval and the second data being outside a second interval. (FIG. 13 resistance measurement 78, comparator 80, threshold 82, alarm 68 [0017] produce an alarm signal, [0113] compare voltages to threshold, [0138-0139] “detection threshold”, “provide an indication of a thermal runaway event”,) Regarding claims 5 and 6, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches wherein at least a portion of the first electric conduit and a portion of the second electric conduit are arranged on a printed circuit board (“PCB”). ([0040] The sensing circuit may be provided on a circuit board … , for example, a flexible printed circuit board.) This also teaches claim 6, wherein the PCB is a flexible printed circuit (“FPC”). Regarding claim 8, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches a battery device (FIG. 1 battery 1) comprising at least one battery cell (FIG. 2 and [0087] battery cell units 24), a first sensor circuit, a second sensor circuit, (FIG. 11 sensor circuits 62A and 62B), a housing enclosing the at least one battery cell (FIG. 2 and [0087] battery module 12, end plates 26, cover 30), and comprising an over pressure relief path (FIG. 7 vents 60 sensors 62), and a thermal runaway detection circuit of claim 1 connected to the first sensor circuit and the second sensor circuit, wherein the first electric conduit and the second electric conduit of the thermal runaway detection circuit are arranged at the over pressure relief path. ([0099] and FIG. 7 vents 60 sensors 62) Regarding claim 9, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches further comprising a pressure relief valve arranged to control the over pressure relief path. (FIG. 7 vents 60) Regarding claim 10, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches ([0037] current, voltage and [0044] the sensors may be temperature sensors), these candidates are within the scope of the claimed list of alternatives. Regarding claim 11, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches battery pack comprising two or more battery devices of claim 8 (FIG. 1, FIG. 2 showing multiple cells 24 and modules 12) and a battery pack processing circuit connected to each of the processing circuits of the two or more battery devices. ([0012] “a sensing circuit extending across the plurality of battery cells”, [0126] “comparator 80 outputs a signal to the alarm signal generator. … The output of the alarm signal generator is sent to the battery management system 16. [0052] “The battery management unit may be arranged to receive alarm signals from each of the battery modules.”) Regarding claim 12, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches wherein the battery pack processing circuit is configured to generate a battery pack thermal runaway indication responsive to obtaining a thermal runaway indication from at least one of the processing circuits of the two or more battery devices. (FIG. 13 threshold 82, comparator 80, alarm 68, [0119-0120] “provide an early indication of imminent thermal runaway event … output of comparator 80 is connected to the alarm signal generator 68.) Regarding claim 13, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches wherein the battery pack processing circuit is configured to generate the battery pack thermal runaway indication responsive to obtaining thermal runaway indications from at least two of the processing circuits of the two or more battery devices. ([0114] “some protection against false positives can be provided by detecting when both trace circuits are severed.”) Regarding claim 14, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches vehicle comprising at least one battery device of any claim 8. ([0002) traction applications such as electric or hybrid vehicle) Regarding claims 15 and 17, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches wherein the vehicle is configured to alert an operator of the vehicle responsive to the battery device generating a thermal runaway indication. ([0104] warn vehicle occupants … driver) Regarding claim 16, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches vehicle comprising at least one battery pack of claim 11. ([0002) traction applications such as electric or hybrid vehicle) Regarding claim 18, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches method of detecting thermal runaway of a battery device according to claim 8, the method comprising: obtaining first data from the first electric conduit and second data from the second electric conduit, and (FIG. 8 and [0120] “output of resistance measurement unit 78 is connected to an input of comparator 80.”) and generating a thermal runaway indication based on the first data and the second data. (FIG. 13 threshold 82, comparator 80, alarm 68, [0119-0120] “provide an early indication of imminent thermal runaway event … output of comparator 80 is connected to the alarm signal generator 68.) Regarding claim 19, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches wherein generating a thermal runaway indication comprises generating the thermal runaway indication responsive to the first data being outside a first interval, and the second data being outside a second interval. ([0120] monitoring system … comparator, threshold generator, and generating a thermal runaway indication based on the first data and the second data [0114] “detecting when both trace circuits are severed.”) Regarding claim 20, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches wherein generating a thermal runaway indication comprises generating the thermal runaway indication responsive to the first data indicating a first data maximum value or a first data minimum value, and the second data indicating a second data maximum value or a second data minimum value. (FIG. 13 threshold 82, comparator 80, alarm 68, [0119-0120] “provide an early indication of imminent thermal runaway event … output of comparator 80 is connected to the alarm signal generator 68. [0114] “some protection against false positives can be provided by detecting when both trace circuits are severed.”) Examiner notes that the connection of the threshold generator to the comparator as shown FIG. 13 creates a thermal runaway indication responsive to the maximum or minimum values for each of the first and second data. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 3, 4, and 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hilligoss (US 2022007507 A1) in view of Nagase (US 20040189323 A1). Regarding claim 3, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, however Hilligoss does not explicitly teach a first impedance control circuit connected to the first electric conduit between the processing circuit and the over pressure relief path and/or a second impedance control circuit connected to the second electric conduit between the processing circuit and the over pressure relief path. Nagase, in the field of electrical engineering, teaches (abstract) a disconnection detecting circuit comprising a control circuit and a sensor circuit. At FIG. 2 and [0011] Nagase “provides a disconnection detecting circuit capable of detecting a disconnection of a connection line between circuits in a State where a useless current dissipation stemming from a current flow in a resistance element connected to an inside of a terminal of a sensor circuit is brought under control while avoiding an increase in contact resistance at terminal contacts to the utmost by increasing the energizing current with respect to a terminal to which a connection line is connected in a normal operation.” At [0012] “At the occurrence of a disconnection of a connection line, the sensor circuit side impedance is set to be higher than the control circuit side impedance, which enables the detection of the disconnection of the connection line put between the control circuit and the sensor circuit.” Examiner notes that because impedance is modified, therefore Nagase’s circuit is an impedance control circuit. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated, as of before the effective filing date of the instant invention, to modify the thermal runaway detection circuit of Hilligoss by adding the impedance control circuit of Nagase, with a reasonable expectation of successfully improving detection of a sensor disconnection. Regarding claim 4, Hilligoss in view of Nagase teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches wherein the processing circuit is configured to generate the thermal runaway indication responsive to the first data indicating a first data maximum value or a first data minimum value and/or the second data indicating a second data maximum value or a second data minimum value. ([0114] “detecting … when both trace circuits have severed”) Examiner notes that when both trace circuits are severed, they will report minimum or maximum values, depending on what is being measured (resistance, voltage, current) Regarding claim 7, Hilligoss teaches all of the limitations as set forth above, and Hilligoss further teaches the thermal runaway detection circuit further comprising wherein the processing circuit is configured to generate the thermal runaway indication responsive to the first data indicating a first data maximum value or a first data minimum value and the second data indicating a first data maximum value or a first data minimum value; (FIG. 13 resistance measurement 78, comparator 80, threshold 82, alarm 68 [0017] produce an alarm signal, [0013] compare voltages to threshold, [0114] “detecting … when both trace circuits have severed”) the processing circuit is further configured to generate the thermal runaway indication responsive to the first data being outside a first interval and the second data being outside a second interval; ([0120] monitoring system … comparator, threshold generator, and generating a thermal runaway indication based on the first data and the second data [0114] detecting when both trace circuits are severed). at least a portion of the first electric conduit and a portion of the second electric conduit are arranged on a printed circuit board (“PCB”) wherein the PCB is a flexible printed circuit (“FPC”). ([0040] The sensing circuit may be provided on a circuit board … , for example, a flexible printed circuit board.) However, Hilligoss does not explicitly teach a first impedance control circuit connected to the first electric conduit between the processing circuit and the over pressure relief path and/or a second impedance control circuit connected to the second electric conduit between the processing circuit and the over pressure relief path. Nagase, in the field of electrical engineering, teaches (abstract) a disconnection detecting circuit comprising a control circuit and a sensor circuit. At FIG. 2 and [0011] Nagase “provides a disconnection detecting circuit capable of detecting a disconnection of a connection line between circuits in a State where a useless current dissipation stemming from a current flow in a resistance element connected to an inside of a terminal of a sensor circuit is brought under control while avoiding an increase in contact resistance at terminal contacts to the utmost by increasing the energizing current with respect to a terminal to which a connection line is connected in a normal operation.” At [0012] “At the occurrence of a disconnection of a connection line, the sensor circuit side impedance is set to be higher than the control circuit side impedance, which enables the detection of the disconnection of the connection line put between the control circuit and the sensor circuit.” Examiner notes that because impedance is modified, therefore Nagase’s circuit is an impedance control circuit. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated, as of before the effective filing date of the instant invention, to modify the thermal runaway detection circuit of Hilligoss by adding the impedance control circuit of Nagase, with a reasonable expectation of successfully improving detection of a sensor disconnection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CLAIRE A RUTISER whose telephone number is (571)272-1969. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Leong can be reached at 571-270-1292. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CLAIRE A. RUTISER Examiner Art Unit 1751 /C.A.R./Examiner, Art Unit 1751 /Haroon S. Sheikh/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1751
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 08, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738556
Battery Module and Battery Pack Including the Same
5y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738559
BATTERY PACK AND VEHICLE
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12700588
CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIAL COATED WITH LITHIUM BORATE DOPED LITHIUM CARBONATE AND SULFIDE ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY COMPRISING SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12592374
ELECTRODE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
1y 3m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12562386
METHOD FOR PRODUCING NEGATIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY
4y 8m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
42%
Grant Probability
64%
With Interview (+21.9%)
3y 6m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 165 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month