Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/658,331

TONER, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, IMAGE FORMING METHOD, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING PRINTED MATTER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 08, 2024
Priority
May 12, 2023 — JP 2023-079209
Examiner
KUIPERS, JENNA ANN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
28 granted / 39 resolved
+11.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -6% lift
Without
With
+-6.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
69
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
66.5%
+26.5% vs TC avg
§102
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 39 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in Japan on 5/12/2023. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the JP2023-079209 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 and 4-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kimura (JP 2019-109297) in view of Murata (JP 2022-146467) and considered with REOLOSIL Product Page. Kimura teaches a toner external additive wherein at least part of the silica particle is coated with an oxide or a hydroxide of a metal element and further coated with a fatty acid (Abstract). Figure 1 (b) shows the embodiment wherein only a part of the silica particle surface is coated with the oxide or hydroxide ([0031]). The metal element is at least one selected from aluminum, zinc, calcium, magnesium, strontium, barium, titanium, zirconium, tin, iron, and copper ([0024]). The hydrophobicity of the silica particles is 50% or more ([0017]). The volume resistivity of the silica particle is 1.0x1011 Ω•cm or less ([0018]). Kimura does not teach a preferred particle diameter for the silica particles, however, the exemplary silica particles in Example 2 are REOLOSIL QS 102, which have a primary particle size of 12 nm (REOLOSIL Product Page). Kimura teaches that the silica particles are surface treated with a metal hydroxide and a fatty acid, but is silent regarding the use of an alkylsilane. Murata teaches a toner comprising toner particles, and an external additive, wherein the external additive contains silica particle which are surface treated with aluminum hydroxide and an organic substance (Abstract). The toner particles contain a binder resin and a release agent ([0015]), wherein the binder resin may be an amorphous polyester resin ([0018]). Murata teaches a very similar external additive to the external additive of Kimura, a silica particle having a surface treatment of a metal hydroxide and an organic substance ([0032]). The organic substance preferably contains an alkylsilane or a saturated fatty acid in order to give the toner good fluidity, chargeability, and cleanability ([0033]). The primary particle diameter of the silica is 10 nm to 30 nm, so that the toner exhibits stable charging and the silica particles are not easily detached from the toner ([0035]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the silica particles of Kimura to have used an alkylsilane as the secondary surface treatment for the silica particles, as Murata teaches that both an alkylsilane and a fatty acid can improve the fluidity, chargeability, and cleanability of the toner. Claims 1, 3, and 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kimura (JP 2019-109297) in view of Kubo (US PGP 2022-0350269). The entire discussion of Kimura above is included herein. Kimura teaches that the external additive is for toner, but is silent regarding a suitable toner. Kubo teaches a toner containing at least a binder resin and an external additive (Abstract). The binder resin contains a crystalline resin in order to improve the low temperature fixability of the toner ([0049]) and preferably also contains an amorphous resin from the viewpoint of low-temperature fixability and heat-resistant storage stability ([0052]). The crystalline resin is preferably a crystalline polyester resin ([0076]). It is preferable that the binder resin contains an amorphous polyester resin to facilitate compatibility with the crystalline resin ([0157]). The toner further includes a mold release agent (wax) to improve low temperature fixability ([0215]). The circularity of the toner is preferably 0.940 to 0.995 from the viewpoint of low-temperature fixability ([0230]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have used the toner of Kubo as the toner particle for the external additive of Kimura, as it exhibits excellent low temperature fixability and heat-resistant storage stability. Kubo teaches an image forming apparatus, image forming method, and method of manufacturing a printed matter as recited in claims 8-10 ([0358-372], Figures 1 and 2). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jenna Kuipers whose telephone number is (571)272-0161. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 - 5:30 PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.K./Examiner, Art Unit 1734 /PETER L VAJDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 08/10/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 08, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748357
TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12704795
FINE PARTICLE CONTAINING SILICON AND TONER
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12681403
ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPING TONER, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675060
TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669760
SILICA PARTICLE, TONER FOR DEVELOPING ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (-6.1%)
3y 4m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 39 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month