Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/658,630

IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 08, 2024
Examiner
AYDIN, SEVAN A
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
1y 9m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
445 granted / 556 resolved
+12.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
580
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§112
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 556 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/15/25 has been entered. Claim Objections Claims 6-8 are objected to because of the following informalities: consider changing claim 6 to read “where the width of the metal plate in the width direction gradually decreases toward the end portion of the metal plate”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being clearly anticipated by Nakamoto et al., U.S.P.G. Pub. No. 2022/0100128 (previously cited). Regarding independent claim 6, a fixing apparatus (fig 2) for fixing an unfixed image formed on a recording material to the recording material, comprising: a cylindrical film (24); a planar heater (21) disposed in an internal space of the film so that a longitudinal direction of the heater is parallel to a generatrix direction of the film (figs 2, 3), the heater includes a substrate made of ceramic (21A) and an electrically heating resistance layer formed on the substrate (21B); a roller (30) in contact with an outer circumferential surface of the film and configured to form a nip portion for pinching and conveying the recording material together with the heater via the film (fig 2); and a metal (¶ 33) plate (22) in contact with a surface of the heater opposite to a surface of the heater facing an inner circumferential surface of the film (fig 2) and configured to make a temperature distribution of the heater uniform (¶ 33), wherein, in the nip portion, the unfixed image formed on the recording material is fixed to the recording material while the recording material is conveyed in a conveyance direction (fig 2), wherein as seen in a thickness direction of the heater which is a direction perpendicular to both the longitudinal direction and the conveyance direction (the view in figs 7), the metal plate includes a width constant region (the region near the center where the width is constant) where a width of the metal plate in a width direction of the heater perpendicular to the longitudinal direction is constant and a tapered region (the region near the ends where the metal plate splits to have tapering ends in the width direction which gradually decrease toward the end portion of the metal plate), arranged at position closer to an end portion of the metal plate in the longitudinal direction than the width constant region (figs 7), where the width of the metal plate in the width direction gradually decrease toward the end portion of the metal plate (figs 7), and wherein with respect to the longitudinal direction, the tapered region is arranged from an end of the width constant region to the end portion of the metal plate (figs 7, noting that nothing in the claims requires the tapering to continue until the very end, merely that “the width of the metal plate in the width direction gradually decrease toward the end portion of the metal plate”). Regarding claim 7, which depends from claim 6, wherein with respect to the longitudinal direction, a position of the end portion of the metal plate is outside an end portion of a maximum size recording material conveyable by the fixing apparatus (figs 7 showing the end portion continuing until the end, again noting that nothing in the claims requires the tapering to continue until the very end, merely that “the width of the metal plate in the width direction gradually decrease toward the end portion of the metal plate”). Regarding claim 8, which depends from claim 6, wherein as seen in the thickness direction, all of the electrically heating resistance layer corresponding to the width constant region in the longitudinal direction are located in an area of the metal plate in the width direction, and a part of the electrically heating resistance layer corresponding to the tapered region in the longitudinal direction are located outside the area of the metal plate in the width direction (¶ 38, discussing how the heater 21, which includes the electrically heating resistance layer 21B, is in contact with the metal plate so as to uniform the temperature distribution, such that the region with the taper includes opening 26, such that the heater is located outside the area of the metal plate in the width direction at the opening). Claims 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being clearly anticipated by Yamaguchi, U.S.P.G. Pub. No. 2015/0338795 (previously cited). Regarding independent claim 6, a fixing apparatus (fig 5) for fixing an unfixed image formed on a recording material to the recording material, comprising: a cylindrical film (202); a planar heater (300) disposed in an internal space of the film so that a longitudinal direction of the heater is parallel to a generatrix direction of the film, the heater includes a substrate made of ceramic (¶ 30) and an electrically heating resistance layer (301-1, 301-2) formed on the substrate (¶ 30); a roller (208) in contact with an outer circumferential surface of the film and configured to form a nip portion for pinching and conveying the recording material together with the heater via the film (fig 5); and a metal (¶ 32) plate (220) in contact with a surface of the heater opposite to a surface of the heater facing an inner circumferential surface of the film (fig 5) and configured to make a temperature distribution of the heater uniform (¶ 32, due to its high thermal conductivity), wherein, in the nip portion, the unfixed image formed on the recording material is fixed to the recording material while the recording material is conveyed in a conveyance direction (fig 5), wherein as seen in a thickness direction of the heater (the view as shown in fig 7B) which is a direction perpendicular to both the longitudinal direction and the conveyance direction, the metal plate includes a width constant region (one of the regions near the center only where the width of the metal plate in a width direction of the heater perpendicular to the longitudinal direction is constant) where a width of the metal plate in a width direction of the heater perpendicular to the longitudinal direction is constant and a tapered region (the region near the end including where the width of the metal plate in the width direction gradually decreases toward the end portion of the metal plate), arranged at position closer to an end portion of the metal plate in the longitudinal direction than the width constant region (figs 7), where the width of the metal plate in the width direction gradually decrease toward the end portion of the metal plate, and wherein with respect to the longitudinal direction, the tapered region is arranged from an end of the width constant region to the end portion of the metal plate (figs 7, noting that nothing in the claims requires the tapering to continue until the very end, merely that “the width of the metal plate in the width direction gradually decrease toward the end portion of the metal plate”). Regarding claim 7, which depends from claim 6, wherein with respect to the longitudinal direction, a position of the end portion of the metal plate is outside an end portion of a maximum size recording material conveyable by the fixing apparatus (figs 7, showing the metal plate extending at least as far as the heater, which must be longer than the maximum size recording material conveyable by the fixing apparatus so that the fixing device can adequately fix the toner onto the sheet). Regarding claim 8, which depends from claim 6, wherein as seen in the thickness direction, all of the electrically heating resistance layer corresponding to the width constant region in the longitudinal direction are located in an area of the metal plate in the width direction, and a part of the electrically heating resistance layer corresponding to the tapered region in the longitudinal direction are located outside the area of the metal plate in the width direction (¶ 56-58, discussing how the widths 220Wd, which is the smallest widths of the metal plate, and located in the tapered region, are smaller than the widths 220Wb, which is the same width as the heater, ¶ 48). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/15/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicants have made no attempt to point out the patentable novelty over the cited references of the amended claims newly added as claims 6-8, in derogation of MPEP 714.04. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEVAN A AYDIN whose telephone number is (571)270-3209. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9AM-6PM PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Walter Lindsay can be reached at (571) 272-1674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEVAN A AYDIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 08, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jun 18, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 15, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602005
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601996
FIXING MEMBER, FIXING DEVICE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585217
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585214
HEATING DEVICE, FIXING DEVICE, DRIER, LAMINATE PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578669
DEVELOPER FEED ROLLER, DEVELOPING APPARATUS, ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND PROCESS CARTRIDGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+5.7%)
1y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 556 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month