Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/659,403

SEAT FOR VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 09, 2024
Examiner
WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Das Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
1790 granted / 2169 resolved
+30.5% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
2206
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§102
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2169 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
January 23, 2026 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1-3, 5, 9, 13, and 17 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1, line 12, “an other” is grammatically incorrect. The two words should be written as - - another - -. In Claim 2, line 4, the word - - the - - should be inserted in front of the word “bracket”. In claim 3, line 4, “an other” is grammatically incorrect The two words should be written as - - another - -. In claim 5, lines 4 and 6, “an other” (2 instances) is grammatically incorrect. The two words should be written as - - another - -. In claim 9, line 5, the word - - top - - needs to be inserted in front of the “one”. On line 8, the word “core” should be - - cores - - In claim 13, line 5, “an other” is grammatically incorrect. The two words should be written as - - another - -. In claim 17, line 12, “an other” is grammatically incorrect. The two words should be written as - - another - -. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 and 17-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Handigol et al. (U.S. Patent No. 10,442,322 B2). PNG media_image1.png 352 274 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 408 278 media_image2.png Greyscale As for Claims 1 and 17, Handigol et al. teach a seat for a vehicle, comprising: a first seat rail 4 and a second seat rail 4 coupled to the vehicle and spaced apart from each other in left and right directions; a first slider positioned on the first seat rail 4 on a left side of the seat and a second slider 40 positioned on the second seat rail 4 on a right side of the seat, wherein the first and second sliders 40.40 are configured to slide in forward and rearward directions; a first side frame 1 positioned on the left side of the seat and configured to change position with respect to the first slider 40, and a second side frame 1 positioned on the right side of the seat and configured to change position with respect to the second slider; a link arm 54 connecting the first slider 10 and the first side frame 1 on one side in forward and rearward directions; a linker connecting the first slider 40 and the first side frame 1 on another side in forward and rearward directions, and including a plurality of link members 50,60; and a plurality of drivers 42,61 connected to the plurality of link members of the linker to provide rotational force; wherein the first slider, the link arm, the first side frame, the second link member, and the first link member are hinged to each other to form a five-bar linkage mechanism, as defined in claim 17. As for Claim 2, Handigol et al. teach that each of the first and second sliders comprise: a moving rail 40,40 sliding along the seat rail 4; and a bracket 70,71 mounted on the moving rail 40,40; wherein bracket includes a hinge hole or a hinge portion P1 connecting the link arm 54 and the linker 50,60. As for Claims 3 and 18, Handigol et al. teach that the link arm 54 is positioned on a front side of the seat, and the linker 50,60 is positioned on a rear side of the seat; and one end of the link arm 54 is rotatably hinged to the first side frame, 1 and another end of the link arm 54 is rotatably hinged to the first slider 40. As for Claim 4, Handigol et al. teach that after rotation of the link arm 54, a spring 53 assisting return of the link arm 54 is mounted on at least one hinge portion, among hinge portions on both ends of the link arm. As for Claim 5, Handigol et al. teach that the linker comprises a first link member 50 and a second link member 50; wherein one end of the first link member 50 is rotatably hinged to the first slider 40; another end of the first link member 50 is hinged to one end of the second link member 60 to rotate relative to each other; and another end of the second link 60 member is rotatably hinged to the first side frame. As for Claim 6, Handigol et al. teach that the first and second side frames 1 are connected by at least one cross-bar 102. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Handigol et al. do not teach that the first driver is connected to the first link member, and the second driver is connected to the second link member., as defined in claim 7. Handigol et al. teach that one driver is connected to the guide rail assembly 4 and the other driver is connected to the second link of the linker. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure because it teaches structures and concepts similar to those of the present invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Rodney B. White whose telephone number is (571)272-6863. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David R. Dunn can be reached at (571) 272-6670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Rodney B White/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594862
BABY CARRIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593917
FOLDING RECLINER WITH GUIDE MECHANISMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588769
CONVERTIBLE INFANT CHAIR ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588763
SEATING FURNITURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589683
SEAT PAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.7%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 2169 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month