Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/659,419

COMPACT MODE CONVERTER WAVEGUIDE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 09, 2024
Examiner
MASKELL, MICHAEL P
Art Unit
2878
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Varian Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
932 granted / 1082 resolved
+18.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
1089
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§103
41.8%
+1.8% vs TC avg
§102
35.6%
-4.4% vs TC avg
§112
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1082 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5, 8-10, 13, 14, 16, 19 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhuo, et al (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2019/0198963 A1). Regarding claims 1 and 13, Zhuo discloses a radiation support system comprising a waveguide assembly comprising: A waveguide (110) extending along a first axis (Fig. 2); A mode launcher (204) extending along a second axis, the second axis being different than the first axis (Fig. 2); and A resonant cavity twist (paragraph 0027: resonant cavities 104-a and 104-b form a waveguide twist) coupling the waveguide to the mode launcher (paragraph 0040). Regarding claim 2, Zhuo discloses wherein the waveguide is rectangular (Fig. 2). Regarding claim 3 and 14, Zhuo discloses wherein the resonant cavity twist is a single step resonant cavity twist (resonant cavities 104-a and 104-b). Regarding claims 5 and 16, Zhuo discloses wherein the waveguide includes a first portion between the mode launcher and the resonant cavity twist and a second portion on an opposite side of the resonant cavity twist from the mode launcher (Fig. 2). Regarding claims 8, 9, 19 and 20, Zhuo discloses an iris between the mode launcher and the waveguide, wherein a cross section of the iris has a first area smaller than a second area of a cross section of the waveguide (first portion of bend 202 in Fig. 2 can be considered an iris, with an area of the cross section smaller than the one of waveguide 110). Regarding claim 10, Zhuo discloses wherein the mode launcher (204) includes a top surface that is higher than a top surface of the waveguide (110) (Fig. 2). Claim(s) 1, 6, 7, 13, 17 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Xu, et al (CN 111293015 A; cited in IDS; copy in IFW). Regarding claims 1 and 13, Xu discloses a radiation support system comprising a waveguide assembly comprising: A waveguide (part of bend of waveguide 1 extending vertically) extending along a first axis (Fig. 4); A mode launcher (waveguide 5) extending along a second axis, the second axis being different than the first axis (Fig. 4); and A resonant cavity twist (twist 2 in Fig. 2 and 4) coupling the waveguide to the mode launcher (paragraph 0006). Regarding claims 6 and 17, Xu discloses wherein the mode launcher has a cylindrical inner surface (cylindrical waveguide 5). Regarding claims 7 and 18, Xu discloses wherein the cylindrical inner surface of the mode launcher includes a back cavity (4). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4 and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhou in view of Xu, et al (CN 108011165 A; cited in IDS; copy in IFW; Hereinafter “Xu 2”). Regarding claims 4 and 15, Zhou teaches the apparatus of claims 1 and 13, but fails to teach wherein the resonant cavity twist includes a double ridge design. Xu 2 teaches another waveguide assembly, including a resonant cavity twist including a double ridge design (Figs. 1 and 2); Xu 2 furthermore discusses the advantages of such a design, including increased compactness (paragraph 0004). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide Zhou’s resonant cavity twist with a double ridge design as taught by Xu 2, because doing so would allow the assembly to be constructed more compactly. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11 and 12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art fails to teach a plurality of pins protruding from at least one of the waveguide, the mode launcher, or the resonant cavity twist, or a fin inside the mode launcher running at least partly along a length of the mode launcher. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL P MASKELL whose telephone number is (571)270-3210. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10A-6P. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Georgia Epps can be reached at 571-272-2328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL MASKELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2878 25 July 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706290
SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE CLEANLINESS OF MASS SPECTROMETER ION OPTICS
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699077
Automated Modeling of LC Peak Shape
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695056
APPARATUS AND TECHNIQUES FOR SUBSTRATE PROCESSING USING INDEPENDENT ION SOURCE AND RADICAL SOURCE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691189
STERILIZATION OF AN OBJECT USING LOW ENERGY ELECTRON BEAM
1y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12683139
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CHARGE STATE ASSIGNMENT IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+9.2%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1082 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month