Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/659,471

LIQUID EJECTION HEAD AND LIQUID EJECTION APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 09, 2024
Priority
May 11, 2023 — JP 2023-078597
Examiner
LEBRON, JANNELLE M
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
854 granted / 1015 resolved
+16.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1048
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
61.0%
+21.0% vs TC avg
§102
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1015 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 09 May 2024 and 07 January 2026 have been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 4, and 9-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okuda et al. (US 2021/0031552 – hereinafter Okuda) in view of Mizuno (US 2020/0384765.) Regarding claim 1, Okuda discloses a liquid ejection head [26 in figs. 1-2] comprising: an ejection module [30 in fig. 2] including: an ejection port [N in fig. 2] capable of ejecting a liquid [paragraph 0035], a pressure chamber [C in fig. 2] capable of storing the liquid to be ejected from the ejection port [paragraph 0041], a supply channel [61 in fig. 2] configured to supply the liquid to the pressure chamber [paragraph 0040], an energy generator element [44 in fig. 2] capable of generating energy for ejecting the liquid stored in the pressure chamber [paragraph 0044], and a collection channel [72 in fig. 2] configured to collect, to the pressure chamber, the liquid not ejected from the ejection port [paragraphs 0050-0061]; and a support member [48 in fig. 2] joined to the ejection module [as seen in fig. 2] and configured to support the ejection module [paragraphs 0046-0048; seen in fig. 2], wherein the liquid flowing in the pressure chamber, the supply channel, and the collection channel is adjusted to a predetermined temperature by a temperature adjustment mechanism [heater, not shown but mentioned in paragraph 0187.] Even though Okuda teaches that the support member “can be formed by injection molding of a resin material” [paragraph 0047] and it is well-known that a resin material usually has a very low thermal conductivity, the disclosure fails to expressly disclose wherein the resin material has a thermal conductivity of 1.0 (W/m∙K) or lower. However, in the same field of invention, Mizuno discloses a liquid ejection head [10 in fig. 1] comprising: an ejection module including: an ejection port [25 in fig. 1] capable of ejecting a liquid [paragraph 0026], a pressure chamber [43 in fig. 1] capable of storing the liquid to be ejected from the ejection port [paragraph 0029], a supply channel [41 / 42 in fig. 1] configured to supply the liquid to the pressure chamber [paragraph 0031], and an energy generator element [26 in fig. 1] capable of generating energy for ejecting the liquid stored in the pressure chamber [paragraphs 0028 and 0035], and a support member [12 in fig. 1] joined to the ejection module and configured to support the ejection module [as seen in fig. 1; paragraphs 0022-0023], wherein the liquid flowing in the pressure chamber and the supply channel is adjusted to a predetermined temperature by a temperature adjustment mechanism [heater 31 in fig. 1, working in conjunction with thermistor 27; paragraph 0040], and a material for making the support member has a thermal conductivity of 1.0 (W/m∙K) or lower [0.15 to 0.35 (W/m∙K); paragraph 0043.] Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the Okuda invention so that the resin that forms the support member is one that specifically has a thermal conductivity of 1.0 (W/m∙K) or lower as taught by Mizuno for the purpose of the material acting like a thermal barrier, providing structural stability, stable printhead functionality, and protection of components. Regarding claim 2, In the obvious combination, Okuda further discloses wherein the material for making the support member is resin [paragraph 0047; also, paragraph 0043 of Mizuno.] Regarding claim 4, In the obvious combination, Okuda further discloses wherein the support member supports a plurality of the ejection modules [as seen in figs. 2-3.] Regarding claim 9, In the obvious combination, Okuda further discloses wherein the predetermined temperature is 40°C [paragraph 0187.] Regarding claim 10, In the obvious combination, Mizuno further discloses the liquid ejection head further comprising the temperature adjustment mechanism [as seen in fig. 1], wherein the temperature adjustment mechanism is arranged along the channels formed in the ejection module [as seen in fig. 1.] Regarding claim 11, In the obvious combination, Mizuno further discloses wherein the temperature adjustment mechanism includes a heater element [31 in fig. 1], a temperature sensor [27 in fig. 2] configured to detect the temperature of the liquid, and a driver [controller] configured to drive the heater element [paragraphs 0038 and 0040.] Regarding claim 12, In the obvious combination, Okuda further discloses the liquid ejection head further comprising a circulator pump [75 in fig. 5] capable of generating a flow to supply the liquid to the supply channel and a flow to collect the liquid from the collection channel [paragraph 0062.] Regarding claim 13, In the obvious combination, Okuda further discloses wherein the ejection module includes a first circulation path for a first color ink, the first circulation path including the pressure chamber, the supply channel, and the collection channel , and a second circulation path for a second color ink different in color from the first color ink, the second circulation path including the pressure chamber, the supply channel, and the collection channel [paragraphs 0156-0161, 0176 and 0209-0210; implicit and well-known that the printheads for each color will have the same composition.] Regarding claim 14, In the obvious combination, Okuda further discloses wherein the energy generator element is a heater resistor element capable of generating heat to cause film boiling in the liquid [paragraphs 0187 and 0216.] Regarding claim 15, In the obvious combination, Okuda discloses a liquid ejection apparatus comprising: a liquid ejection head [26 in figs. 1-2]; a carriage [242 in fig. 1] configured to move the liquid ejection head in a main-scanning direction with the liquid ejection head mounted on the carriage [paragraph 0033]; and a conveyance unit [22 in fig. 1] configured to convey a printing medium in a conveyance direction crossing the main-scanning direction [paragraph 0032], wherein the liquid ejection head includes an ejection module including an ejection port [N in fig. 2] capable of ejecting a liquid [paragraph 0035], a pressure chamber [C in fig. 2] capable of storing the liquid to be ejected from the ejection port [paragraph 0041], a supply channel [61 in fig. 2] configured to supply the liquid to the pressure chamber [paragraph 0040], an energy generator element [44 in fig. 2] capable of generating energy for ejecting the liquid stored in the pressure chamber [paragraph 0044], and a collection channel [72 in fig. 2] configured to collect, to the pressure chamber, the liquid not ejected from the ejection port [paragraphs 0050-0061]; and a support member [48 in fig. 2] joined to the ejection module and configured to support the ejection module [paragraphs 0046-0048; as seen in fig. 2], the liquid flowing in the pressure chamber, the supply channel, and the collection channel is adjusted to a predetermined temperature by a temperature adjustment mechanism [heater, not shown but mentioned in paragraph 0187], whereas Mizuno discloses wherein a material for making the support member has a thermal conductivity of 1.0 (W/m∙K) or lower [0.15 to 0.35 (W/m∙K); paragraph 0043.] Claims 3 and 5-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okuda as modified by Mizuno. Regarding claims 3 and 5-8, Okuda as modified by Mizuno discloses the claimed limitations as set forth above and Okuda further teaches the liquid ejection head further comprising a face cover [54 in figs. 2-3 and 7] and configured to cover a surface of the liquid ejection head on which the ejection module is arranged while exposing the ejection module [as seen in fig. 2-3 and 7] (claim 8), but fails to expressly disclose wherein a thickness of the support member in a direction in which the support member is joined to the ejection module is 2 mm or more (claim 3), a surface of the support member facing in a direction in which the support member is joined to the ejection module has an area of 1500 mm2 or larger (claim 5), a flow rate of the liquid flowing inside the support member is 10 mL/sec or lower (claim 6), a surface of the ejection module facing in a direction in which the ejection module is joined to the support member has an area of 400 mm2 or smaller (claim 7), and a material for making the face cover has a thermal conductivity of 1.0 (W/m∙K) or lower (claim 8.) However, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have components of a certain size/area or material, and a specific flow rate of liquid, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Antonie, 559 F.2d 618, 195 USPQ 6 (CCPA 1977). See also In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). One would have been motivated to optimize the size and material of components for the purpose of achieving high structural stability and durability while reducing warping and the risk of damage, and to optimize the flow rate of the liquid flowing inside the support member for the purpose of improving printhead longevity and ejection consistency, while achieving a stable thermal and pressure management. Communication with the USPTO Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JANNELLE M LEBRON whose telephone number is (571) 272-2729. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 9:00am - 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas X Rodriguez can be reached at (571) 431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JANNELLE M LEBRON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636879
RECORDING SYSTEM, RECORDING DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629935
PRINTING DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623477
LIQUID DISCHARGE APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD OF LIQUID DISCHARGE APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623466
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12611879
CROSS-TRACK STITCHING ERROR CORRECTION
2y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+2.7%)
2y 2m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1015 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month