Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/659,475

COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND COMMUNICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
May 09, 2024
Examiner
CHO, HONG SOL
Art Unit
2467
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sun Patent Trust
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
959 granted / 1092 resolved
+29.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
1102
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
47.3%
+7.3% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1092 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. DETAILED ACTION Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Claims 1-4 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-8 of U.S. Patent No. 11,051,294. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because: Claims 1-4 differ from patent claims 1-8 in that present claims recite an integrated circuit for transmitting downlink control signals while patent claims a communication apparatus and a method for receiving downlink control signals. Such a change is deemed obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to provide obvious variations. Claims 1-4 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-8 of U.S. Patent No. 12,010,696. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because: Claims 1-4 differ from patent claims 1-8 in that present claims recite an integrated circuit for transmitting downlink control signals while patent claims a communication apparatus and a method for transmitting downlink control signals. Such a change in statue category is deemed obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to provide obvious variations. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Hong Cho whose telephone number is 571-272-3087. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri during 8 am to 4 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Hassan Phillips can be reached on 571-272-3940. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /HONG S CHO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2467
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604269
TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING LOW POWER SIGNALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598545
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593270
SELECTION ASSISTANCE INFORMATION FOR A NETWORK SLICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587957
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CELLULAR PREFERENCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574837
Cell Selection with Coverage Recovery for Reduced Capability User Equipment
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+6.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1092 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month