Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/660,076

METHOD AND SYSTEM OF ASSESSING, REMEDIATING, AND MAINTAINING NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENS (NFTS)

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 09, 2024
Examiner
ABRISHAMKAR, KAVEH
Art Unit
2494
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Atomic Form Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
797 granted / 1020 resolved
+20.1% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1047
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
§103
39.7%
-0.3% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1020 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 1. This action is in response to the communication filed on May 9, 2024. Claims 1-27 were originally received for consideration. No preliminary amendments for the claims have been received. 2. Claims 1-27 are currently pending consideration. Claim Objections 3. Claims 1, 12, 20, 21 and 23 are objected to because of the following informalities: 4. Claim 1 states in the second line “compromising.” This should be corrected to “comprising.” 5. Claim 12 states the “request.” This should be corrected to “requester.” 6. Claim 20 has multiple phrases in parentheses which should be removed and written as affirmative actions. The phrases are “(external or internal)” and “(per request, regular interval, or based on changes emitted from on chain events)” and (“e.g., changes for the better, worse, or changes that resulted in no net difference).” 7. Claim 21 discloses “(when possible)” in a parenthetical expression. The expression should be written in an affirmative expression. 8. Claim 23 discloses that a “change should be employed.” This language discloses that the change is not mandatory. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 9. Claims 1-27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. 10. Claims 1 and 20 disclose that data is received from one or more requesting services, either external or internal. It is unclear what internal or external entities are sending the data. 11. Claim 1 discloses “obtaining any and all necessary external data from external application programming interface, or API, calls, direct review of blockchains, or access to any and all storage locations.” The term “any and all” renders the claims indefinite as this would open up an infinite number of external data and storage locations. 12. Claim 20 discloses “obtaining any and all necessary external data from external application programming interfaces, or APIs, calls, direct review of blockchains, or access to any and all storage.” The term “any and all” renders the claims indefinite as this would open up an infinite number of external data and storage locations. 13. Claim 25 discloses “wherein a duration of monitoring and maintenance of a score is set to meet contractual and legal requirements.” It is indefinite what these requirements would entail, rendering the claims indefinite. 14. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the assessment” in the first line of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. 15. Claim 3 recites the limitation “the request” in the first line of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. 16. Claim 4 recites “the request/result” in the first line of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. 17. Claim 5 recites the limitation “the requester” in the first line of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. 18. Claim 6 recites the limitation “the requester” in the first line of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. 19. Claim 9 recites the limitation “the request” in the 4th limitation. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. 20. Claim 9 recites the limitation “the updated data.” There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It appears that this should be corrected to the “updated set of assessments.” 21. Claim 10 recites the limitation “remediation potential.” There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. 22. Claim 12 recites the limitation “the request.” There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. 23. Claim 17 recites the limitation “the requester” in the first line of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. 24. Claim 18 recites the limitation “the process” in the second line of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAVEH ABRISHAMKAR whose telephone number is (571)272-3786. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jung Kim can be reached at 571-272-3804. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAVEH ABRISHAMKAR/ 10/23/2025Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2494
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598086
TOKENIZED INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION SOFTWARE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598216
SMALL-FOOTPRINT ENDPOINT DATA LOSS PREVENTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585761
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMBINING CYBER-SECURITY THREAT DETECTIONS AND ADMINISTRATOR FEEDBACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585771
LEARNED CONTROL FLOW MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT OF UNOBSERVED TRANSITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579280
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VULNERABILITY SCANNING OF DEPENDENCIES IN CONTAINERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+16.9%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1020 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month