Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/660,107

Force-Activated STYLUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 09, 2024
Examiner
FRANK, EMILY J
Art Unit
2629
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
437 granted / 632 resolved
+7.1% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
663
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
60.1%
+20.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 632 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 11/13/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kihara et al. (US PGPub 2017/0176268) in view of Yamada et al. (US PGPub 2018/0129314). Regarding claim 1, Kihara discloses a stylus (figs. 1-22, a holding state detecting device 10 and [0003], “various electronic writing tools (digital pens)”), comprising: a housing (figs 1 and 12, housing 101) defining a curved interior surface ([0050], “the housing 101 of the object has a cylindrical shape and has a hollow space”) and at least one input surface (fig 1, piezoelectric sensor 20); a flexible circuit (fig. 11, detection conductor 202) coupled to the curved interior surface (figs. 11 and 12); a touch ([0092], “A holding state detecting device 10D according to the present embodiment includes a piezoelectric sensor 20D and a detecting unit 30D”) at least partially disposed within the flexible circuit facing the curved interior surface ([0096], “The first ground conductor 204 is disposed a top surface side of the base film 201. Thus, the piezoelectric sheet 203 is sandwiched between the detection conductor 202 and the first ground conductor 204 in an area at one end side of the first ground conductor 204 in the longitudinal direction. An area at the other end side of the first ground conductor 204 in the longitudinal direction is in contact with the ground conductor 209. In this regard, an insulation film is disposed at a portion at which the first ground conductor 204 and the wiring conductor 2101 overlap. As illustrated in FIG. 11, the first ground conductor 204 is composed of a conductor film 2041, and conductive adhesive members 2042 disposed on both surfaces of the conductor film 2041”); and a force ([0140], “a pressing force is applied when a user grips the piezoelectric sensor 20”) at least partially disposed within the flexible circuit facing an interior of the housing in a direction opposite the curved interior surface ([0098], “The second ground conductor 205 is disposed on a top surface of the base film 202. As illustrated in FIG. 11, the second ground conductor 205 is composed of a conductor film 2051, and conductive adhesive members 2052 disposed on both surfaces of the conductor film 2051. The second ground conductor 205 conducts with the first ground conductor 204 via the areas of the cutouts 211” and [0102], “In this regard, as illustrated in FIGS. 10 and 11, part of the second ground conductor 205 is exposed without being covered by the protection film 207, and therefore the conductive adhesive member 2052 at this exposed portion adheres the piezoelectric sensor 20D to the inner wall surface of the housing 101. Thus, the piezoelectric sensor 20D is fixed to the housing 101”) that detects a force exerted on the housing that deforms the flexible circuit ([0140], “the piezoelectric sensor 20 is disposed in an area which is not used for normal click processing, and is disposed at a position to which a pressing force is applied when a user grips the piezoelectric sensor 20”). While Kihara discloses using conductors to detect a touch and a force, it has been known to detect touch and force using sensors. In a similar field of endeavor of stylus devices, Yamada discloses a touch sensor and a force sensor ([0091], “various types of sensors such as a capacitive sensor, a strain gage, and the like can be used as the pressure sensor 21”). In view of the teachings of Kihara and Yamada, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, to use the sensors of Yamada within the stylus of Kihara, for the purpose of providing a stylus which can isolate the configuration of a pen pressure detecting portion from a value output from the stylus ([0022]). Regarding claim 2, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses further comprising an integrated circuit coupled to the flexible circuit (Kihara: [0100], “the electronic parts 302 can include a computer processing unit (“CPU”), such as a microprocessor, and memory with software code (i.e., processor executable instructions) stored thereon, such that the CPU is configured to execute the algorithms described herein. Moreover, a circuit pattern is formed on the base substrate 301”). Regarding claim 3, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses wherein: a first portion of the flexible circuit is coupled to a first portion of the curved interior surface; and a second portion of the flexible circuit is coupled to a second portion of an interior surface of the housing (Kihrara: fig. 12, vertical line shows one section of 20D on one side and another section of 20D on the other side). Regarding claim 4, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses wherein the at least one input surface comprises a first input surface and a second input surface opposite the first input surface (Kihara: fig. 12, vertical line separating each side of element 10D). Regarding claim 5, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses wherein: the force sensor is operable to detect the force applied to the first input surface (Kihara: [0102], “a pressing force is applied when a user grips the piezoelectric sensor 20”); and the touch sensor is operable to detect a touch applied to the second input surface (Kihara: [0024], “it is possible to detect the holding state, and receive an input of an operation different from detection of the holding state performed by the holding state detecting device”). Regarding claim 6, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses wherein: the touch sensor includes a touch sensor electrode ([0096], “first ground conductor 204”); and the force sensor includes a force sensor electrode ([0098], “second ground conductor 205”). Regarding claim 7, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses further comprising a shield disposed between the touch sensor electrode and the force sensor electrode (Kihara: [0094], “The base film 201 has an insulation property”). Regarding claim 8, Kihara discloses a stylus ([0003], “various electronic writing tools (digital pens)”), comprising: a housing (figs 1 and 12, housing 101) defining an interior surface ([0050], “the housing 101 of the object has a cylindrical shape and has a hollow space”) and at least one input surface (fig 1, piezoelectric sensor 20); a flexible circuit (fig. 11, detection conductor 202) coupled to the interior surface (figs. 11 and 12); a touch ([0092], “A holding state detecting device 10D according to the present embodiment includes a piezoelectric sensor 20D and a detecting unit 30D”) coupled to the flexible circuit facing the interior surface ([0096], “The first ground conductor 204 is disposed a top surface side of the base film 201. Thus, the piezoelectric sheet 203 is sandwiched between the detection conductor 202 and the first ground conductor 204 in an area at one end side of the first ground conductor 204 in the longitudinal direction. An area at the other end side of the first ground conductor 204 in the longitudinal direction is in contact with the ground conductor 209. In this regard, an insulation film is disposed at a portion at which the first ground conductor 204 and the wiring conductor 2101 overlap. As illustrated in FIG. 11, the first ground conductor 204 is composed of a conductor film 2041, and conductive adhesive members 2042 disposed on both surfaces of the conductor film 2041”); and a force ([0140], “a pressing force is applied when a user grips the piezoelectric sensor 20”) coupled to the flexible circuit facing an interior of the housing in a direction opposite the interior surface ([0098], “The second ground conductor 205 is disposed on a top surface of the base film 202. As illustrated in FIG. 11, the second ground conductor 205 is composed of a conductor film 2051, and conductive adhesive members 2052 disposed on both surfaces of the conductor film 2051. The second ground conductor 205 conducts with the first ground conductor 204 via the areas of the cutouts 211” and [0102], “In this regard, as illustrated in FIGS. 10 and 11, part of the second ground conductor 205 is exposed without being covered by the protection film 207, and therefore the conductive adhesive member 2052 at this exposed portion adheres the piezoelectric sensor 20D to the inner wall surface of the housing 101. Thus, the piezoelectric sensor 20D is fixed to the housing 101”) that detects a force exerted on the housing that deforms the flexible circuit ([0140], “the piezoelectric sensor 20 is disposed in an area which is not used for normal click processing, and is disposed at a position to which a pressing force is applied when a user grips the piezoelectric sensor 20”). While Kihara discloses using conductors to detect a touch and a force, it has been known to detect touch and force using sensors. In a similar field of endeavor of stylus devices, Yamada discloses a touch sensor and a force sensor ([0091], “various types of sensors such as a capacitive sensor, a strain gage, and the like can be used as the pressure sensor 21”). In view of the teachings of Kihara and Yamada, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, to use the sensors of Yamada within the stylus of Kihara, for the purpose of providing a stylus which can isolate the configuration of a pen pressure detecting portion from a value output from the stylus ([0022]). Regarding claim 9, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses wherein the flexible circuit is laminated to the interior surface (Kihara: [0102], “the conductive adhesive member 2052 at this exposed portion adheres the piezoelectric sensor 20D to the inner wall surface of the housing 101. Thus, the piezoelectric sensor 20D is fixed to the housing 101”). Regarding claim 10, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses wherein: a first portion of the flexible circuit is coupled to a first portion of the interior surface; and a second portion of the flexible circuit is coupled to a second portion of the interior surface (Kihara: shows element 20D on both sides of the vertical line). Regarding claim 11, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses wherein the first portion of the interior surface and the second portion of the interior surface are curved (Kihara: fig. 12, 101 on both sides of the vertical line is curved). Regarding claim 12, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses further comprising a shield disposed between the touch sensor and the force sensor (Kihara: [0094], “The base film 201 has an insulation property”). Regarding claim 13, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses wherein the interior surface is flat (Kihara: [0144], “A holding state detecting device 10J is a tablet terminal. The holding state detecting device 10J includes a housing 141J. The housing 141J has a flat plate shape”). Regarding claim 14, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses wherein the interior surface is curved (Kihara: fig. 12). Regarding claim 15, Kihara discloses a stylus ([0003], “various electronic writing tools (digital pens)”), comprising: a housing (figs 1 and 12, housing 101) defining an interior surface ([0050], “the housing 101 of the object has a cylindrical shape and has a hollow space”), an interior ([0050], hollow space), and at least one input surface (fig 1, piezoelectric sensor 20); a flexible circuit (fig. 11, detection conductor 202) coupled to the interior surface (figs. 11 and 12); a touch ([0092], “A holding state detecting device 10D according to the present embodiment includes a piezoelectric sensor 20D and a detecting unit 30D”) coupled to the flexible circuit facing the interior surface ([0096], “The first ground conductor 204 is disposed a top surface side of the base film 201. Thus, the piezoelectric sheet 203 is sandwiched between the detection conductor 202 and the first ground conductor 204 in an area at one end side of the first ground conductor 204 in the longitudinal direction. An area at the other end side of the first ground conductor 204 in the longitudinal direction is in contact with the ground conductor 209. In this regard, an insulation film is disposed at a portion at which the first ground conductor 204 and the wiring conductor 2101 overlap. As illustrated in FIG. 11, the first ground conductor 204 is composed of a conductor film 2041, and conductive adhesive members 2042 disposed on both surfaces of the conductor film 2041”); and a force ([0140], “a pressing force is applied when a user grips the piezoelectric sensor 20”) coupled to the flexible circuit facing the interior of the housing in a direction opposite the interior surface ([0098], “The second ground conductor 205 is disposed on a top surface of the base film 202. As illustrated in FIG. 11, the second ground conductor 205 is composed of a conductor film 2051, and conductive adhesive members 2052 disposed on both surfaces of the conductor film 2051. The second ground conductor 205 conducts with the first ground conductor 204 via the areas of the cutouts 211” and [0102], “In this regard, as illustrated in FIGS. 10 and 11, part of the second ground conductor 205 is exposed without being covered by the protection film 207, and therefore the conductive adhesive member 2052 at this exposed portion adheres the piezoelectric sensor 20D to the inner wall surface of the housing 101. Thus, the piezoelectric sensor 20D is fixed to the housing 101”) that detects a force exerted on the housing that deforms the flexible circuit ([0140], “the piezoelectric sensor 20 is disposed in an area which is not used for normal click processing, and is disposed at a position to which a pressing force is applied when a user grips the piezoelectric sensor 20”). While Kihara discloses using conductors to detect a touch and a force, it has been known to detect touch and force using sensors. In a similar field of endeavor of stylus devices, Yamada discloses a touch sensor and a force sensor ([0091], “various types of sensors such as a capacitive sensor, a strain gage, and the like can be used as the pressure sensor 21”). In view of the teachings of Kihara and Yamada, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, to use the sensors of Yamada within the stylus of Kihara, for the purpose of providing a stylus which can isolate the configuration of a pen pressure detecting portion from a value output from the stylus ([0022]). Regarding claim 16, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses wherein the force sensor comprises a strain gauge (Yamada: [0091], “various types of sensors such as a capacitive sensor, a strain gage, and the like can be used as the pressure sensor 21”). Regarding claim 17, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses wherein the touch sensor is a capacitive touch sensor (Yamada: [0091], “various types of sensors such as a capacitive sensor, a strain gage, and the like can be used as the pressure sensor 21”). Regarding claim 18, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses wherein the interior surface is curved (Kihara: fig. 12 the surface is curved). Regarding claim 19, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses wherein the flexible circuit is coupled to the interior surface using adhesive (Kihara: [0102], “the conductive adhesive member 2052 at this exposed portion adheres the piezoelectric sensor 20D to the inner wall surface of the housing 101. Thus, the piezoelectric sensor 20D is fixed to the housing 101”). Regarding claim 20, the combination of Kihara and Yamada further discloses further comprising a shield coupled to the flexible circuit (Kihara: [0094], “The base film 201 has an insulation property”). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1, 8 and 15 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EMILY J FRANK whose telephone number is (571)270-7255. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin C Lee can be reached at (571)272-2963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EJF/ /BENJAMIN C LEE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2629
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2024
Application Filed
May 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 19, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 19, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 20, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 12, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 12, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 12, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 13, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12585343
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING STYLUS TILT IN RELATION TO A TOUCH-SENSING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12547208
Foldable Display Device and Driving Method Therefor
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12531033
BACKLIGHT MODULE BRIGHTNESS CALIBRATION METHOD, DISPLAY DEVICE THEREOF, AND BRIGHTNESS CALIBRATION DEVICE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12512070
DISPLAY DEVICE MINIMIZING EFFECT OF LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12505791
TILED DISPLAY DEVICE UTILIZING A RAIL FRAME AND MAGNETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+19.2%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 632 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month