Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 29, 2026
Application No. 18/660,164

SUBSTRATE TRANSFER APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 09, 2024
Priority
May 12, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0061498
Examiner
BURKMAN, JESSICA LYNN
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Vm Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
179 granted / 218 resolved
+30.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
236
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
42.5%
+2.5% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 218 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on July 14th, 2026, has been entered. By the amendment claims 1-2, 6-8, and 10-13 are pending with claims 1 and 6 being amended, claims 3-5 and 9 being canceled, and new claims 10-13 being added. Claim Interpretation Terms such as “first,” “second,” “third” are interpreted as labels differentiating different components. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 10-13 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 10, line 7-8 recites wherein the first path and the second path cross each other at a crossing point such that the first pivot axis is able to move up, down, left, and right from the crossing point. The specification is silent to movement in an up and down direction. There is no vertical movement recited in the specification. The specification only details latitudinal and longitudinal movement. Claims 11-13 are rejected by virtue of their dependencies. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-2, 6-8, and 10-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hayashi et al. (US 20020044860), hereafter Hayashi. With regards to claim 1, Hayashi discloses a substrate transfer apparatus (Abstract) comprising: a moving plate(conveyance chamber 6); a load lock chamber (transfer parts 43, 44) disposed at one end of the moving plate; a plurality of processing chambers disposed in a longitudinal direction at both ends of the moving plate (processing parts 11-15); and an arm (robot arm 26) connected with the moving plate (via conveying units 21, 26) and configured to transfer a substrate between one processing chamber among the plurality of processing chambers and the load lock chamber (Fig. 5), wherein the arm includes a first region (262) and a second region rotatably (263) coupled to the first region, the first region pivots about a first pivot axis with respect to the moving plate (P045, L10-13), and the second region pivots about a second pivot axis with respect to the first region (P045, L13-14), wherein the moving plate provides a first path (33) along which the first pivot axis, about which the first region pivots with respect to the moving plate, linearly moves in a lateral direction on the moving plate, wherein the moving plate provides a third path (34e) along which the first pivot axis linearly moves in an oblique direction on the moving plate. With regards to claim 2, Hayashi discloses all the elements of claim 1 as outlined above. Hayashi further discloses wherein a position of the first pivot axis on the first path is determined based on a position of the one processing chamber relative to the moving plate (Fig. 5). With regards to claim 6, Hayashi discloses all the elements of claim 1 as outlined above. Hayashi further discloses wherein the third path crosses the first path (Fig. 5). With regards to claim 7, Hayashi discloses all the elements of claim 1 as outlined above. Hayashi further discloses wherein the first path includes a rail (P045, L16-19). With regards to claim 8, Hayashi discloses all the elements of claim 1 as outlined above. Hayashi further discloses wherein the first path includes a plurality of links (links are points along the path) and the first pivot axis is disposed at one of the plurality of links to transfer the substrate from the one processing chamber (end of segment 34c in Fig. 5). With regards to claim 10, Hayashi discloses a substrate transfer apparatus (Abstract) comprising: a moving plate (conveying chamber 6); a load lock chamber (transfer parts 43, 44) disposed at one end of the moving plate; a plurality of processing chambers (processing parts 11-18) disposed in a longitudinal direction at both ends of the moving plate; and an arm (robot arm 26) connected with the moving plate (via conveying units 21, 26) and configured to transfer a substrate between one processing chamber among the plurality of processing chambers and the load lock chamber (Fig. 4),wherein the arm includes a first region (262) and a second region rotatably coupled to the first region (263), the first region pivots about a first pivot axis with respect to the moving plate (P045, L10-13), and the second region pivots about a second pivot axis with respect to the first region(P045, L13-14), wherein the moving plate provides a first path (31a) along which the first pivot axis, about which the first region pivots with respect to the moving plate, linearly moves in a lateral direction on the moving plate, wherein the moving plate provides a second path (3) along which the first pivot axis linearly moves in the longitudinal direction on the moving plate, wherein the first path and the second path cross each other at a crossing point such that the first pivot axis is able to move up, down, left, and right from the crossing point (Fig. 4). With regards to claim 11, Hayashi discloses all the elements of claim 10 as outlined above. Hayashi further discloses wherein a position of the first pivot axis on the first path is determined based on a position of the one processing chamber relative to the moving plate (Fig. 4). With regards to claim 12, Hayashi discloses all the elements of claim 10 as outlined above. Hayashi further discloses wherein the first path includes a rail (P045, L16-19). With regards to claim 13, Hayashi discloses all the elements of claim 10 as outlined above. Hayashi further discloses wherein the first path includes a plurality of links, and the first pivot axis is disposed at one of the plurality of links (links are just points along the path) to transfer the substrate from the one processing chamber (shown in Fig. 4 near processing part 11) Response to Arguments The applicant’s arguments are rendered moot. New grounds of rejection are presented above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JESSICA LYNN BURKMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5824. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:30am to 6:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael McCullough can be reached at (571)272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.L.B./Examiner, Art Unit 3653 /MICHAEL MCCULLOUGH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Jul 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12727427
SUBSTRATE SUPPORT DEVICE WITH DIAGNOSTIC CAPABILITIES
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727430
SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESS EQUIPMENT
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715023
SORTING ARRANGEMENT FOR SORTING OBJECTS AND A CORRESPONDING METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12693237
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR EXAMINING CONTAINERS FOR IMPURITIES
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686110
SUBSTRATE TRANSFER DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+15.7%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 218 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month