Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/660,365

POLYAXIAL BONE FIXATION ELEMENT

Final Rejection §112
Filed
May 10, 2024
Priority
Jul 20, 2007 — provisional 60/950,995 +9 more
Examiner
HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY
Art Unit
3773
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
DePuy Synthes Products Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
958 granted / 1229 resolved
+7.9% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
1269
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§102
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1229 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Priority Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) is acknowledged. Applicant has not complied with one or more conditions for receiving the benefit of an earlier filing date under 35 U.S.C. 120 as follows: The later-filed application must be an application for a patent for an invention which is also disclosed in the prior application (the parent or original nonprovisional application or provisional application). The disclosure of the invention in the parent application and in the later-filed application must be sufficient to comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, except for the best mode requirement. See Transco Products, Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc., 38 F.3d 551, 32 USPQ2d 1077 (Fed. Cir. 1994). The disclosure of the prior-filed application, Application No. 60/950,995, fails to provide adequate support or enablement in the manner provided by 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph for one or more claims of this application. The prior-filed application fails to disclose the claimed first, second, and third diameters (see claim 19). Accordingly, none of claims 19-27 have been awarded priority to this application. The disclosure of the prior-filed application, Application No. 60/988,584, fails to provide adequate support or enablement in the manner provided by 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph for one or more claims of this application. The prior-filed application fails to disclose the claimed first, second, and third diameters (see claim 19). Accordingly, none of claims 19-27 have been awarded priority to this application. The claims have been awarded priority to PCT/US2008/070670, which was filed on July 21, 2008. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 19-29, 39, and 40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 19 has been amended to recite that a diameter of the lower terminal end of the expandable portion is greater than a diameter of the upper terminal end of the expandable portion. Such a recitation constitutes new matter. The specification fails to disclose such a feature. Furthermore, it is not clear that the figures provide support. Figs. 1 and 5A-5C show the expandable portion (collet 150) having an upper terminal end (upper end 152) and a lower terminal end (lower end 154). However, because the specification fails to state that the figures are drawn to scale, it cannot be concluded from the figures that the diameter at the lower terminal end is greater than the diameter at the upper terminal end. Accordingly, claim 19 contains new matter. Claims 20-29, 39, and 40 depend from claim 19 and therefore also contain new matter. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JULIANNA N HARVEY whose telephone number is (571)270-3815. The examiner can normally be reached Mon.-Fri. 8:00am-5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Robert can be reached at (571)272-4719. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JULIANNA N HARVEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3773
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 15, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 27, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 27, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702448
Press-On Link for Surgical Screws
10y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702285
RECEPTACLE FOR A LARYNGOSCOPE AND METHOD OF USING SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702447
ROD FOR SPINAL FIXTURE, AND SPINAL FIXTURE COMPRISING SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702445
PROGRAMMABLE TOOL FOR EXTERNAL FIXATION STRUT ADJUSTMENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697020
VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE IMAGE FILE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+19.0%)
2y 10m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1229 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month