Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/660,945

CIRCUIT BOARD REINFORCING STRUCTURE, PHOTOSENSITIVE APPARATUS, AND TERMINAL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 10, 2024
Examiner
MILAKOVICH, NATHAN J
Art Unit
2848
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Shenzhen Yinwang Intelligent Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
543 granted / 699 resolved
+9.7% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
715
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 699 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Drawings Figure 1 should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art-- because only that which is old is illustrated. See MPEP § 608.02(g). Corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The replacement sheet(s) should be labeled “Replacement Sheet” in the page header (as per 37 CFR 1.84(c)) so as not to obstruct any portion of the drawing figures. If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8, 10-11, and 14-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Publication 2013/0016273 to Mueller. Claim 1 Mueller (FIG. 5) discloses a circuit board reinforcing structure, wherein: the circuit board reinforcing structure is used in a circuit board assembly, the circuit board assembly comprises a circuit board (4, paragraph 26) and a photosensitive chip (6, paragraph 15, 26), the circuit board (4) comprises a first surface and a second surface that are opposite to each other, and the photosensitive chip (6) is disposed on the first surface of the circuit board (4) and is electrically connected to the circuit board (4); and the circuit board reinforcing structure comprises a reinforcing plate (5, paragraph 26), the reinforcing plate (5) comprises a third surface and a fourth surface that are opposite to each other, the reinforcing plate (5) and the circuit board (4) are fastened to each other, the third surface and the first surface are in surface contact, and both the reinforcing plate (5) and the photosensitive chip (6) are located on a side of the circuit board (4) on which the first surface of the circuit board (4) is located (FIG. 5). Claim 2 Mueller discloses the circuit board reinforcing structure according to claim 1, wherein a slot (9, paragraph 32) is provided on the reinforcing plate (5), and the photosensitive chip (6) is located in the slot (9). Claim 3 Mueller discloses the circuit board reinforcing structure according to claim 2, wherein a shape of the slot (9) is geometrically similar to a shape of an outer contour of the photosensitive chip (6)(FIG. 5, paragraph 20). Claim 4 Mueller discloses the circuit board reinforcing structure according to claim 3, wherein both the shape of the slot (9, paragraph 20) and the shape of the outer contour of the photosensitive chip (6; see FIG. 3) are rectangular, a size of the slot (9) is greater than a size of the outer contour of the photosensitive chip (6; FIG. 5, paragraph 20), and a gap exists between a periphery of the slot (9) and the outer contour of the photosensitive chip (6; FIG. 5, paragraph 20) Claim 5 Mueller discloses the circuit board reinforcing structure according to claim 1, wherein the reinforcing plate (5) and the circuit board (4) are fastened to each other in at least one of the following manners: bonded to each other by using an adhesive, fastened by using a threaded connection member, fastened to each other by soldering, or fastened to each other in an integrally formed manner (paragraph 17). Claim 6 Mueller discloses the circuit board reinforcing structure according to claim 1, wherein the photosensitive chip (6) is electrically connected to the circuit board (4) through a solder joint (paragraph 21) Claim 7 Mueller (FIG. 5) discloses a photosensitive apparatus, wherein the photosensitive apparatus comprises a circuit board reinforcing structure, and wherein: the circuit board reinforcing structure is used in a circuit board assembly, the circuit board assembly comprises a circuit board (4, paragraph 26) and a photosensitive chip (6, paragraph 15, 26), the circuit board (4) comprises a first surface and a second surface that are opposite to each other, and the photosensitive chip (6) is disposed on the first surface of the circuit board (4) and is electrically connected to the circuit board (4); and the circuit board reinforcing structure comprises a reinforcing plate (5, paragraph 26), the reinforcing plate (5) comprises a third surface and a fourth surface that are opposite to each other, the reinforcing plate (5) and the circuit board (4) are fastened to each other, the third surface and the first surface are in surface contact, and both the reinforcing plate (5) and the photosensitive chip (6) are located on a side of the circuit board (4) on which the first surface of the circuit board (4) is located (FIG. 5). Claim 8 Mueller discloses the photosensitive apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the photosensitive apparatus further comprises the circuit board assembly, a holder (2, paragraph 29), and an optical system (2.1, paragraph 29) configured to collect light, the optical system (2.1) and the reinforcing plate (5) are fastened to the holder (2), an optical axis of the optical system (2.1) is perpendicular to a photosensitive surface of a photosensitive chip (6) of the circuit board assembly, a path is formed in the holder (2), and light passing through the optical system (2.1) is capable of reaching the photosensitive surface through the path (FIG. 5, paragraph 28-29). Claim 10 Mueller discloses the photosensitive apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the optical system (2.1) comprises a housing (2; see also claim 11 below: housing and holder integrally formed) and a lens element (2.1), and the lens element (2.1) is accommodated and disposed in the housing (2). Claim 11 Mueller discloses the photosensitive apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the housing (2) and the holder (2) are integrally formed (FIG. 5). Claim 14 Mueller discloses the photosensitive apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the reinforcing plate (5) and the holder (2) are separately manufactured, and the reinforcing plate (5) and a peripheral part of a second opening of the path are fastened to each other (FIG. 5, paragraph 10). Claim 15 Mueller discloses the photosensitive apparatus according to claim 14, wherein the reinforcing plate (5) and the holder (2) are fastened to each other by using an adhesive (3, paragraph 10, 26) and the adhesive (3) is fully cured after active assembly (FIG. 5, paragraph 10, 26) Claim 16 Mueller discloses the photosensitive apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the photosensitive apparatus is a lens module or a lidar apparatus (Abstract). Claim 17 Mueller discloses the photosensitive apparatus according to claim 7, wherein a slot (9, paragraph 32) is provided on the reinforcing plate (5), and the photosensitive chip (6) is located in the slot (9). Claim 18 Mueller discloses the photosensitive apparatus according to claim 17, wherein a shape of the slot (9) is geometrically similar to a shape of an outer contour of the photosensitive chip (6)(FIG. 5, paragraph 20). Claim 19 Mueller discloses the photosensitive apparatus according to claim 18, wherein both the shape of the slot (9, paragraph 20) and the shape of the outer contour of the photosensitive chip (6; see FIG. 3) are rectangular, a size of the slot (9) is greater than a size of the outer contour of the photosensitive chip (6; FIG. 5, paragraph 20), and a gap exists between a periphery of the slot (9) and the outer contour of the photosensitive chip (6; FIG. 5, paragraph 20) Claim 20 Mueller discloses the photosensitive apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the reinforcing plate (5) and the circuit board (4) are fastened to each other in at least one of the following manners: bonded to each other by using an adhesive, fastened by using a threaded connection member, fastened to each other by soldering, or fastened to each other in an integrally formed manner (paragraph 17). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 9 and 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mueller. Claim 9 Mueller discloses the photosensitive apparatus according to claim 8, as shown above. Mueller does not expressly disclose wherein the reinforcing plate and the holder are integrally formed, as recited in claim 9. Such an arrangement, however, the integral forming of two assemblies, is a mere engineering choice, obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. See MPEP 2144.V.B. Making Integral quoting In re Larson, 340 F.2d 965, 968, 144 USPQ 347, 349 (CCPA 1965): “that the use of a one piece construction instead of the structure disclosed in [the prior art] would be merely a matter of obvious engineering choice”. Claim 12 Mueller discloses the photosensitive apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the housing (2) and the holder (2) are integrally formed (FIG. 5). Mueller does not expressly disclose wherein the housing, the reinforcing plate, and the holder are integrally formed, as recited in claim 12. Such an arrangement, however, the integral forming of three assemblies, is a mere engineering choice, obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. See MPEP 2144.V.B. Making Integral quoting In re Larson, 340 F.2d 965, 968, 144 USPQ 347, 349 (CCPA 1965): “that the use of a one piece construction instead of the structure disclosed in [the prior art] would be merely a matter of obvious engineering choice”. Claim 13 Mueller discloses the photosensitive apparatus according to claim 10, as shown above. Mueller (FIG. 1-2) teaches wherein the housing (2) and the holder (12) are separately manufactured, a flange part is disposed on the housing (2), and the flange part and a peripheral part of a first opening of the path are fastened to each other (FIG. 1-2). Note the separate housing 2 and holder 3 arrangement of Mueller is disclosed as prior art (FIG. 1-2). While a separate housing and holder arrangement is described by Mueller as “complicated”, this does not preclude the use of a separate housing and holder combined with the rest of the disclosure of Mueller. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize a separate housing and holder as disclosed as known in the art by Mueller, as one having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do this with a reasonable expectation of success because such a combination and/or modification allows for adjusting parameters such as focal length, lens arrangement and thickness within the lens assembly without having to change the holder, and allows for utilizing pre-packaged lens assemblies, allowing for sourcing from vendors rather than assembling the lenses, holder, and housing in one process step. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHAN MILAKOVICH whose telephone number is (571) 270-3087. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Dole can be reached at (571) 272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHAN MILAKOVICH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2848
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603226
MULTILAYERED CAPACITOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604404
CIRCUIT BOARD WELD STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603223
MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597565
MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12579914
WINDING-TYPE DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETECTING LIGHT EMISSION INFORMATION OF WINDING-TYPE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+19.3%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 699 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month