Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/660,967

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 10, 2024
Priority
Nov 25, 2021 — JP 2021-191493 +1 more
Examiner
RIRIE, EVERETT TRAJAN
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Rohm Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
50%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allowance Rate
2 granted / 4 resolved
-18.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
33
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
53.5%
+13.5% vs TC avg
§102
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
§112
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 4 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Acknowledgment is made of the amendment filed 09/30/2026, in which: claim(s) 1, 8, 11, 14, and 15 is/are amended; claim(s) 18 and 19 is/are new; and the rejection of the claims are traversed. Claim(s) 1-19 is/are currently pending an Office action on the merits as follows. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 09/30/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-19 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to Applicant’s arguments that neither H1 nor M1 disclose “the second portion is formed on an entirety of the obverse surface and an entirety of the reverse surface” because the (B)-layer 12 of M1, which is relied upon to disclose the second portion, allegedly “does not cover the lower surface of the alleged first portion (11)” (see page 2), Examiner respectfully disagrees. As claimed, the obverse and reverse surfaces may correspond to, for example, left and right surfaces of H1’s encapsulating material 80, as shown in the annotated H1 FIG. 1 below, between which is an entirety each of the structures corresponding to the features which are claimed as being between the obverse and reverse surfaces. Within this interpretation of H1, left and right surfaces of M1’s (A)-layer 11 in M1 FIG. 4 correspond to the obverse and reverse surfaces, on the entirety of which is formed the (B)-layer 12, corresponding to the second portion. Therefore, the limitations added to claim 1 by amendment are disclosed by the combination of H1 and M1, as previously set forth. PNG media_image1.png 614 994 media_image1.png Greyscale Information Disclosure Statement The listing of references in the PCT international search report is not considered to be an information disclosure statement (IDS) complying with 37 CFR 1.98. 37 CFR 1.98(a)(2) requires a legible copy of: (1) each foreign patent; (2) each publication or that portion which caused it to be listed; (3) for each cited pending U.S. application, the application specification including claims, and any drawing of the application, or that portion of the application which caused it to be listed including any claims directed to that portion, unless the cited pending U.S. application is stored in the Image File Wrapper (IFW) system; and (4) all other information, or that portion which caused it to be listed. In addition, each IDS must include a list of all patents, publications, applications, or other information submitted for consideration by the Office (see 37 CFR 1.98(a)(1) and (b)), and MPEP § 609.04(a), subsection I. states, “the list ... must be submitted on a separate paper.” Therefore, the references cited in the international search report have not been considered. Applicant is advised that the date of submission of any item of information in the international search report will be the date of submission of the IDS for purposes of determining compliance with the requirements for the IDS with 37 CFR 1.97, including all timing statement requirements of 37 CFR 1.97(e). See MPEP § 609.05(a). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6, 8-13, and 16-17 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ho et al. (US 8427844 B2, hereinafter H1), and further in view of Mori et al. (US 20220310546 A1, hereinafter M1). Regarding independent claim 1, H1 discloses in H1 FIG. 1 and associated text A semiconductor device comprising: a first semiconductor element (transmitter integrated circuit (IC) 60a); a second semiconductor element (receiver IC 64a); an insulating element (coil transducer 10a is an insulating element where, in light of the specification, “insulating element” is interpreted as meaning an electrical component through which there is no direct conductive path between input and output, including, but not limited to transformers and capacitors) electrically connected to the first semiconductor element and the second semiconductor element, and insulating the first semiconductor element and the second semiconductor element from each other (transducer 10a is electrically connected to ICs 60a and 64a and insulate the two via dielectric barrier 22a); and a sealing resin covering the first semiconductor element, the second semiconductor element, and the insulating element (encapsulating material 80 is epoxy (H1 (23)), which is a resin, and surrounds 10a, 60a, and 64a), wherein the sealing resin includes a first portion covering the first semiconductor element, the second semiconductor element, and the insulating element (encapsulating material 80), the first portion includes an obverse surface and a reverse surface (a left and a right surface of 80, as shown in annotated H1 FIG. 1 below) with an entirety of each of the first semiconductor element, the second semiconductor element, and the insulating element being disposed between the obverse surface and the reverse surface (the entirety of each of 60a, 64a, and 10a are between the obverse and reverse surfaces of 80, as interpreted). PNG media_image1.png 614 994 media_image1.png Greyscale H1 does not explicitly disclose the sealing resin includes a second portion constituting an outermost surface of the sealing resin, the second portion is less prone to a tracking phenomenon than the first portion, or the second portion is formed on an entirety of the obverse surface and an entirety of the reverse surface. However, in the same field of endeavor, M1 discloses in M1 FIG. 4 and associated text the sealing resin includes a second portion constituting an outermost surface of the sealing resin ((B)-layer is the outer surface of the multi-layer resin sheet comprising an (A)- (corresponding to the first portion) and (B)-layer), the second portion is less prone to a tracking phenomenon than the first portion ((A)-layer has a filler content of 76%-85% by mass while (B)-layer has a filler content of 80%-90% by mass in the most preferable embodiments of M1 (M1 [0056], [0093]), and the second portion is formed on an entirety of the obverse surface and an entirety of the reverse surface ((B)-layer is formed on the entirety of the left and right surfaces of (A)-layer, corresponding to the obverse and reverse surfaces, as interpreted above). According to the instant application, when the filler content of the second portion is greater than that of the first portion by percent mass, the second portion is less prone to a tracking phenomenon (Instant application p. 15, lines 14-19). Therefore, M1 anticipates an embodiment in which (B)-layer is inherently less prone to a tracking phenomenon than (A)-layer because the preferred filler content range of (B)-layer is greater than that of (A)-layer). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the multi-layer resin of M1 and its composition with the semiconductor device of H1 such that M1’s (A)-layer corresponds to H1’s encapsulating material 80 and M1’s (B)-layer is formed on its outermost surface to provide a semiconductor device with warpage of encapsulated components suppressed (M1 [0093]). Regarding dependent claim 2, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in M1 FIG. 4 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the first portion includes a first resin portion and a plurality of first fillers ((A)-layer contains one or more fillers (M1 [0052])), the second portion includes a second resin portion and a plurality of second fillers ((B)-layer contains fillers (M1 [0092])), and a content percentage of the second fillers in the second portion is higher than a content percentage of the first fillers in the first portion ((A)-layer has a filler content of 76%-85% by mass while (B)-layer has a filler content of 80%-90% by mass in the most preferable embodiments of M1 (M1 [0056], [0093]). Therefore, M1 anticipates an embodiment in which the filler content of (B)-layer is greater than that of (A)-layer). Regarding dependent claim 3, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in M1 FIG. 4 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 2, wherein the second fillers contain at least one of silicon oxide (SiO2) and alumina (Al2O3) ((B)-layer contains fillers of the same kind as (A)-layer, which may include silica and alumina (M1 [0092], [0052])). Regarding dependent claim 4, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in M1 FIG. 4 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 2, wherein the first fillers contain at least one of silicon oxide (SiO2) and alumina (Al2O3) ((A)-layer fillers may include silica and alumina (M1 [0092], [0052])). Regarding dependent claim 5, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in M1 FIG. 4 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 4, wherein the first fillers and the second fillers contain silicon oxide (SiO2) ((B)-layer contains fillers of the same kind as (A)-layer, which may include silica and alumina (M1 [0092], [0052])). Regarding dependent claim 6, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in M1 FIG. 4 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the second portion contains a low viscosity (LV) resin having a low melting point and a low molecular weight or a dicyclopentadiene (DCPD) resin having an alicyclic structure ((B)-layer contains DCPD glycidyl ether, a DCPD resin (M1 [0097]-[0099]), where DCPD resins are earlier identified as being alicyclic (M1 [0063])). Regarding dependent claim 8, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in H1 FIG. 1 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 1, further comprising: a conductive member electrically connected to the first semiconductor element and the second semiconductor element (lead frames 56 and 58 connected to 60a and 64a respectively), wherein the conductive member includes a first die pad and a second die pad spaced apart from each other (portions of 56 and 58 on which 60a, 64a, and/or 10a attach are interpreted as a first and second die pad; see annotated H1 FIG. 1 below), the first die pad and the second die pad are insulated from each other via the first portion (80 is between and therefore insulating 56 and 58 and their respective die pads), the first semiconductor element is supported by the first die pad, and the second semiconductor element is supported by the second die pad (as interpreted, 60a is mounted on the first die pad of 56 and 64a is mounted on the second die pad of 58). PNG media_image2.png 481 1017 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding dependent claim 9, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in H1 FIG. 1 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 8, wherein the insulating element is supported by the first die pad (10a is supported by the portion of 56 on which dies are attached, corresponding to the first die pad). Regarding dependent claim 10, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in H1 FIG. 1 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 8, wherein the insulating element is supported by the first die pad (10a is supported by the portion of 58 on which dies are attached, corresponding to the second die pad). Regarding dependent claim 11, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in H1 FIG. 1 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 1, further comprising a conductive member electrically connected to the first semiconductor element and the second semiconductor element (lead frames 56 and 58 connected to 60a and 64a respectively, together considered a conductive member), wherein the conductive member includes a die pad (portions of 56 and 58 on which 60a, 64a, and/or 10a attach are together interpreted as a die pad; see annotated H1 FIG. 1 below), and the first semiconductor element, the second semiconductor element, and the insulating element are supported by the die pad (as interpreted, 60a, 64a, and 10a are mounted on the die pad of 56 and 58). PNG media_image3.png 481 1017 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding dependent claim 12, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in H1 FIG. 1 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 11, wherein the second semiconductor element and the insulating element are supported by the die pad via an insulating substrate (64a and 10a are supported by adhesive tape 25a, 27a, and 29a, considered an insulating substrate because it may be made of an insulating material such as epoxy (H1 (21))). Regarding dependent claim 13, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in H1 FIG. 1 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 11, wherein the second semiconductor element and the insulating element are supported by the die pad via an insulating substrate (64a and 10a are supported by adhesive tape 23a, 25a, and 27a, considered an insulating substrate because it may be made of an insulating material such as epoxy (H1 (21))). Regarding dependent claim 16, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in H1 FIG. 1 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the insulating element is located between the first semiconductor element and the second semiconductor element in a first direction (10a is between 60a and 64a in a horizontal direction). Regarding dependent claim 17, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in H1 FIG. 1 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the insulating element is either of an inductive type or a capacitive type (10a is a transducer (H1 (20)), which is an inductive component). Regarding dependent claim 18, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in H1 FIG. 1 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the first semiconductor element, the second semiconductor element, and the insulating element are each disposed inward of the second portion (each of 60a, 64a, and 10a are disposed in 80, corresponding to the first portion, which is inward of the second portion, as combined). Regarding dependent claim 19, H1, as modified by M1, further discloses in H1 FIG. 1 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the second portion covers an entirety of the first portion (as combined, M1’s (B)-layer, corresponding to the second portion covers at least the top and sidewall portions of the first portion (H1’s 80/M1’s (A)-layer), which is interpreted as covering an entirety of the first portion since, from at least a top-down view, the second portion lies over or obstructs from view the entirety of the first portion). Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over H1, and further in view of M1 and Mori et al. (US 20190091907 A1, hereinafter M2). Regarding dependent claim 7, H1, as modified by M1, discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 1. It does not explicitly disclose the first portion includes an irregular portion, and the second portion is in contact with the irregular portion. However, in the same field of endeavor, M2 discloses the first portion includes an irregular portion, and the second portion is in contact with the irregular portion (resin member 10, corresponding to the first portion, has a roughened surface 11a, which is in contact with resin member 20, corresponding to the second portion). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the roughened interface of M2 with the semiconductor device of H1, as modified by M1, to provide good adhesion between the first and second portions (M2 [0056]). Claims 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over H1, and further in view of M1 and Haigh et al. (US 20130154071 A1, hereinafter H2). Regarding dependent claim 14, H1, as modified by M1, discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 8. It does not explicitly disclose a first wire connected to the first semiconductor element and the conductive member; and a second wire connected to the second semiconductor element and the conductive member, wherein the first wire and the second wire are covered with the first portion. However, in the same field of endeavor, H2 discloses in H2 FIG. 3 and associated text a first wire connected to the first semiconductor element and the conductive member (wire connection 233 between die 205 and pin 202); and a second wire connected to the second semiconductor element and the conductive member (wire connection 219 between die 215 and pin 222), wherein the first wire and the second wire are covered with the first portion (233 and 219 are covered in encapsulant 230, corresponding to the first portion). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the die-to-lead frame wires of H2 with the semiconductor device of H1, as modified by M1, to provide external connections to pins for signal I/O (H1 [0034]). Regarding dependent claim 15, H1, as modified by M1 and H2, further discloses in H1 FIG. 1 and associated text The semiconductor device according to claim 14, further comprising: a third wire connected to the first semiconductor element and the insulating element (wire bond 48a); and a fourth wire connected to the second semiconductor element and the insulating element (wire bond 54a), wherein the third wire and the fourth wire are covered with the first portion (48a and 54a are covered by 80, corresponding to the first portion). Conclusion Pertinent Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to the applicant’s disclosure: US 9929038 B2, pertaining to another solution to a tracking phenomenon in a sealing resin layer. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EVERETT TRAJAN RIRIE whose telephone number is (571)272-9559. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Thu: 8:30 am - 6:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chad Dicke can be reached at (571) 270-7996. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EVERETT T RIRIE/Examiner, Art Unit 2897 /CHAD M DICKE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 30, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
50%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 8m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 4 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month