Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/661,297

MULTIPLE CARRIER PHASE MEASUREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH POSITIONING FREQUENCY LAYER AND DIFFERENTIAL CARRIER PHASE MEASUREMENT REPORTING

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
May 10, 2024
Priority
May 12, 2023 — provisional 63/501,967
Examiner
PEREZ, ANGELICA
Art Unit
2649
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
595 granted / 791 resolved
+13.2% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
802
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.2%
+20.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 791 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5, 11-15, 21, 24, 26 and 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by (Manolakos et al., hereinafter Manolakos). Regarding claim 1, Manolakos discloses a method of operating a wireless measurement entity (pars. [0002]-[0003], UE or network nodes corresponding to position estimation entity), comprising: receiving, from a position estimation entity, a reference signal for positioning (RS-P) resource configuration that configures a set of RS-P occasions associated with a first positioning frequency layer (PFL) in association with a position estimation session of a user equipment (UE) (paragraphs [0094]-[0096],”… receiving, from a network entity, a configuration for measuring the PRS measurements…”); measuring a first carrier phase of the first PFL at a first carrier frequency associated with a RS-P occasion from the set of RS-P occasions (paragraph [0097]); measuring a second carrier phase of the first PFL at a second carrier frequency associated with the RS-P occasion from the set of RS-P occasions (paragraph [0097]: "At block 1330, the functionality comprises tuning RF circuitry of the UE from an active BWP to one or more frequency bands of at least two PFLs of the plurality of PFLs. Further, at block 1340, the functionality comprises receiving a plurality of PRS resources of the at least two PFLs from one or more network nodes. Additionally, at block 340, the functionality comprises, subsequent to receiving the plurality of PRS resources, re-tuning the RF circuitry of the UE to the active BWP. As noted in the above-described embodiments, the operations at blocks 1330, 1340, and 1345 may take place during a measurement window (e.g., MG) for each measurement window in a series of measurement windows in a measurement period used to take PRS measurements (shown, for example, in FIG. 12). It is further noted that the receipt of PRS resources in different PFLs may be done in accordance with a TDMed and/or FDMed configuration. For embodiments utilizing a TDMed configuration (e.g., as shown in FIG. 10), receiving the plurality of PRS resources of the at least two PFLs may comprise receiving a first PRS resource of a first PFL during a first set of Orthogonal Frequency -Division Multiplexing (OFDM) symbols in a measurement window, and receiving a second PRS resource of a second PFL during a second set of OFDM symbols in the measurement window. In some embodiments, the UE may re-tune RF circuitry between the first and second sets of symbols. Thus, in such embodiments, the first PFL may be on a first frequency band, and subsequent to receiving the first PRS resource and prior to the re-tuning the RF circuitry of the UE to the active BWP, the RF circuitry of the UE is tuned to a second frequency band, where the second PRS resource is received via the second frequency band. For embodiments utilizing an FDMed configuration (e.g., as shown in FIGS. 11 and 12), receiving the plurality of PRS resources of the at least two PFLs may comprise receiving a first PRS resource of a first PFL and a second PRS resource of a second PFL during the same set of OFDM symbols in a single measurement window"); and transmitting at least one measurement report that indicates the measured first carrier phase of the first PFL and the measured second carrier phase of the first PFL to the position estimation entity (paragraphs [0100], [0101], “…they may be provided by the UE to a location server in a positioning session between the two entities…”). Regarding claim 11, Manolakos discloses a method of operating a position estimation entity (pars. [0002]-[0003], UE or network nodes corresponding to position estimation entity), comprising: transmitting, to a wireless measurement entity, a reference signal for positioning (RS-P) resource configuration that configures a set of RS-P occasions associated with a first positioning frequency layer (PFL) in association with a position estimation session of a user equipment (UE) (paragraphs [0094]-[0096], “… receiving, from a network entity, a configuration for measuring the PRS measurements…”, where the network entity transmits the configuration to the UE); receiving, from the wireless measurement entity, at least one measurement report that indicates a measured first carrier phase of the first PFL at a first carrier frequency associated with a RS-P occasion from the set of RS-P occasions and a measured second carrier phase of the first PFL at a second carrier frequency associated with the RS-P occasion from the set of RS-P occasions (paragraphs [0093], [0097], [0100] and [0101]); and determining a position estimate of the UE based on the at least one measurement report (pars. [0093]-[0093], [0104], “Location determination…”). Regarding claim 21, Manolakos discloses a method of operating a wireless measurement entity (pars. [0002]-[0003], UE or network nodes corresponding to position estimation entity), comprising: receiving, from a position estimation entity, a reference signal for positioning (RS-P) resource configuration that configures a set of RS-P occasions associated with a positioning frequency layer (PFL) in association with a position estimation session of a user equipment (UE) (paragraphs [0094]-[0096],”… receiving, from a network entity, a configuration for measuring the PRS measurements…”); measuring a carrier phase of the PFL at a carrier frequency associated with a RS-P occasion from the set of RS-P occasions (paragraph [0097]: "At block 1330, the functionality comprises tuning RF circuitry of the UE from an active BWP to one or more frequency bands of at least two PFLs of the plurality of PFLs. Further, at block 1340, the functionality comprises receiving a plurality of PRS resources of the at least two PFLs from one or more network nodes. Additionally, at block 340, the functionality comprises, subsequent to receiving the plurality of PRS resources, re-tuning the RF circuitry of the UE to the active BWP. As noted in the above-described embodiments, the operations at blocks 1330, 1340, and 1345 may take place during a measurement window (e.g., MG) for each measurement window in a series of measurement windows in a measurement period used to take PRS measurements (shown, for example, in FIG. 12). It is further noted that the receipt of PRS resources in different PFLs may be done in accordance with a TDMed and/or FDMed configuration. For embodiments utilizing a TDMed configuration (e.g., as shown in FIG. 10), receiving the plurality of PRS resources of the at least two PFLs may comprise receiving a first PRS resource of a first PFL during a first set of Orthogonal Frequency -Division Multiplexing (OFDM) symbols in a measurement window, and receiving a second PRS resource of a second PFL during a second set of OFDM symbols in the measurement window. In some embodiments, the UE may re-tune RF circuitry between the first and second sets of symbols. Thus, in such embodiments, the first PFL may be on a first frequency band, and subsequent to receiving the first PRS resource and prior to the re-tuning the RF circuitry of the UE to the active BWP, the RF circuitry of the UE is tuned to a second frequency band, where the second PRS resource is received via the second frequency band. For embodiments utilizing an FDMed configuration (e.g., as shown in FIGS. 11 and 12), receiving the plurality of PRS resources of the at least two PFLs may comprise receiving a first PRS resource of a first PFL and a second PRS resource of a second PFL during the same set of OFDM symbols in a single measurement window"); and transmitting a measurement report that indicates the measured carrier phase of the PFL differentially (paragraphs [0093]-[0097], [0100] and [0101], paragraphs [0093]-[0096], “…they may be provided by the UE to a location server in a positioning session between the two entities…”). Regarding claim 26, Manolakos discloses a method of operating a position estimation entity (pars. [0002]-[0003], UE or network nodes corresponding to position estimation entity), comprising: transmitting, to a wireless measurement entity, a reference signal for positioning (RS-P) resource configuration that configures a set of RS-P occasions associated with a positioning frequency layer (PFL) in association with a position estimation session of a user equipment (UE) (paragraphs [0094]-[0096], “… receiving, from a network entity, a configuration for measuring the PRS measurements…”, where the network entity transmits the configuration to the UE); and receiving, from the wireless measurement entity, a measurement report that differentially indicates a measured carrier phase of the PFL at a carrier frequency associated with a RS-P occasion from the set of RS-P occasions (paragraph [0097]: "At block 1330, the functionality comprises tuning RF circuitry of the UE from an active BWP to one or more frequency bands of at least two PFLs of the plurality of PFLs. Further, at block 1340, the functionality comprises receiving a plurality of PRS resources of the at least two PFLs from one or more network nodes. Additionally, at block 340, the functionality comprises, subsequent to receiving the plurality of PRS resources, re-tuning the RF circuitry of the UE to the active BWP. As noted in the above-described embodiments, the operations at blocks 1330, 1340, and 1345 may take place during a measurement window (e.g., MG) for each measurement window in a series of measurement windows in a measurement period used to take PRS measurements (shown, for example, in FIG. 12). It is further noted that the receipt of PRS resources in different PFLs may be done in accordance with a TDMed and/or FDMed configuration. For embodiments utilizing a TDMed configuration (e.g., as shown in FIG. 10), receiving the plurality of PRS resources of the at least two PFLs may comprise receiving a first PRS resource of a first PFL during a first set of Orthogonal Frequency -Division Multiplexing (OFDM) symbols in a measurement window, and receiving a second PRS resource of a second PFL during a second set of OFDM symbols in the measurement window. In some embodiments, the UE may re-tune RF circuitry between the first and second sets of symbols. Thus, in such embodiments, the first PFL may be on a first frequency band, and subsequent to receiving the first PRS resource and prior to the re-tuning the RF circuitry of the UE to the active BWP, the RF circuitry of the UE is tuned to a second frequency band, where the second PRS resource is received via the second frequency band. For embodiments utilizing an FDMed configuration (e.g., as shown in FIGS. 11 and 12), receiving the plurality of PRS resources of the at least two PFLs may comprise receiving a first PRS resource of a first PFL and a second PRS resource of a second PFL during the same set of OFDM symbols in a single measurement window"). Regarding claims 2 and 12, Manolakos discloses all the limitations of claims 1 and 11, respectively. Manolakos further discloses wherein the first carrier frequency of the first PFL and the second carrier frequency of the first PFL are pre-defined or pre-configured, or wherein the first carrier frequency of the first PFL and the second carrier frequency of the first PFL are indicated by the at least one measurement report (paragraph [0095], “receiving, from a network entity, a configuration for measuring the PRS measurements…other types of configurations may be made and provided to the UE by a different network entity, such as the location server…”). Regarding claims 3 and 13, Manolakos discloses all the limitations of claims 1 and 11, respectively. Manolakos further discloses further comprising: transmitting a carrier phase measurement capability of the wireless measurement entity to the position estimation entity, wherein the RS-P resource configuration is based on the carrier phase measurement capability (paragraph [0090], “the UE can provide information indicative of its capabilities to a network node (e.g., location server or TRP)… certain band or frequency range (FR)…”). Regarding claims 4 and 14, Manolakos discloses all the limitations of claims 1 and 11, respectively. Manolakos further discloses wherein the first carrier frequency of the first PFL and the second carrier frequency of the first PFL are configured by the position estimation entity, or wherein at least one of the first carrier frequency of the first PFL and the second carrier frequency of the first PFL corresponds to a central frequency relative to a full bandwidth of the first PFL or a subband of the first PFL, or wherein at least one of the first carrier frequency of the first PFL, the second carrier frequency of the first PFL, or both, corresponds to a subcarrier index relative to a reference point associated with the first PFL, or any combination thereof (paragraph [0097]). Regarding claims 5 and 15, Manolakos discloses all the limitations of claims 1 and 11, respectively. Manolakos further discloses wherein the first carrier frequency of the first PFL and the second carrier frequency of the first PFL are defined via reference to a bandwidth associated with the first PFL, and wherein the bandwidth comprises: a number of subcarriers, or a number of resource blocks (RBs), or a ratio that is relative to a full bandwidth of the PFL, or a number of subbands (paragraph [0097], “receipt of PRS resources in different PFLs …”). Regarding claims 24 and 28, Manolakos discloses all the limitations of claims 21 and 26, respectively. Manolakos further discloses receiving/transmitting, from/to the position estimation entity/wireless measurement entity, a recommendation of a first measurement reference for at least differential carrier phase measurement reporting (par. [0097], the receipt of PRS resources in different PFLs may be done in accordance with a TDMed and/or FDMed configuration). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6-10, 16-20, 22-23, 25, 27 and 29-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Manolakos in view of Further Discussion on Improved Accuracy Based on NR Carrier Phase Measurement (hereinafter CATT). Regarding claims 6 and 16, Manolakos discloses all the limitations of claims 1 and 11, respectively. Manolakos does not specifically disclose reporting error information associated with the measured first carrier phase of the first PFL, the measured second carrier phase of the first PFL, or both, to the position estimation entity. In related art concerning Improved Accuracy Based on NR Carrier Phase Measurement, CATT discloses reporting error information associated with the measured first carrier phase of the first PFL, the measured second carrier phase of the first PFL, or both, to the position estimation entity (item [5.2], pages 17-18, “the difference between the carrier phase measured from the DL PRS signal(s) of the target TRP and the carrier phase measured from DL PRS signal(s) of the reference TRP”; “…information for multipath mitigation, the resolution of the integer ambiguity, etc.…”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use CATT’s teachings about reporting error information associated with the measured first carrier phase of the first PFL, the measured second carrier phase of the first PFL, or both, to the position estimation entity with the simultaneous processing of multiple positioning frequency layers in NR by UR disclosed by Manolakos because one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that by providing error information, adjustments can be made to improve location estimation accuracy. Regarding claims 7 and 17, Manolakos discloses all the limitations of claims 1 and 11, respectively. Manolakos does not specifically disclose wherein the set of RS-P occasions is further associated with a second PFL, further comprising: measuring a third carrier phase of the second PFL at a third carrier frequency associated with the RS-P occasion from the set of RS-P occasions; and measuring a fourth carrier phase of the second PFL at a fourth carrier frequency associated with the RS-P occasion from the set of RS-P occasions, wherein the at least one measurement report further indicates the measured third carrier phase of the second PFL and the measured fourth carrier phase of the second PFL. CATT discloses wherein the set of RS-P occasions is further associated with a second PFL, further comprising: measuring a third carrier phase of the second PFL at a third carrier frequency associated with the RS-P occasion from the set of RS-P occasions; and measuring a fourth carrier phase of the second PFL at a fourth carrier frequency associated with the RS-P occasion from the set of RS-P occasions, wherein the at least one measurement report further indicates the measured third carrier phase of the second PFL and the measured fourth carrier phase of the second PFL (item [5.2], pages 17-18, “reporting the carrier phase measurements corresponding to multiple carrier frequencies…”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use CATT’s teachings wherein the set of RS-P occasions is further associated with a second PFL, further comprising: measuring a third carrier phase of the second PFL at a third carrier frequency associated with the RS-P occasion from the set of RS-P occasions; and measuring a fourth carrier phase of the second PFL at a fourth carrier frequency associated with the RS-P occasion from the set of RS-P occasions, wherein the at least one measurement report further indicates the measured third carrier phase of the second PFL and the measured fourth carrier phase of the second PFL with the simultaneous processing of multiple positioning frequency layers in NR by UR disclosed by Manolakos because one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that by “reporting the carrier phase measurements corresponding to multiple carrier frequencies significantly improve the positioning accuracy of the NR carrier phase positioning…” (CATT, item [5.2], pages 17-18). Regarding claims 8 and 18, Manolakos discloses all the limitations of claims 7 and 17, respectively. Manolakos does not specifically disclose wherein the at least one measurement report comprises: a first measurement report comprising indications of the measured first carrier phase of the first PFL and the measured second carrier phase of the first PFL, and a second measurement report comprising indications of the measured third carrier phase of the second PFL and the measured fourth carrier phase of the second PFL, or a single measurement report comprising indications of the measured first carrier phase of the first PFL, the measured second carrier phase of the first PFL, the measured third carrier phase of the second PFL and the measured fourth carrier phase of the second PFL. CATT discloses wherein the at least one measurement report comprises: a first measurement report comprising indications of the measured first carrier phase of the first PFL and the measured second carrier phase of the first PFL, and a second measurement report comprising indications of the measured third carrier phase of the second PFL and the measured fourth carrier phase of the second PFL, or a single measurement report comprising indications of the measured first carrier phase of the first PFL, the measured second carrier phase of the first PFL, the measured third carrier phase of the second PFL and the measured fourth carrier phase of the second PFL (item [5.2], pages 17-18, “reporting the carrier phase measurements corresponding to multiple carrier frequencies…”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use CATT’s teachings wherein the at least one measurement report comprises: a first measurement report comprising indications of the measured first carrier phase of the first PFL and the measured second carrier phase of the first PFL, and a second measurement report comprising indications of the measured third carrier phase of the second PFL and the measured fourth carrier phase of the second PFL, or a single measurement report comprising indications of the measured first carrier phase of the first PFL, the measured second carrier phase of the first PFL, the measured third carrier phase of the second PFL and the measured fourth carrier phase of the second PFL with the simultaneous processing of multiple positioning frequency layers in NR by UR disclosed by Manolakos because one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that by “reporting the carrier phase measurements corresponding to multiple carrier frequencies may significantly improve the positioning accuracy of the NR carrier phase positioning…” (CATT, item [5.2], pages 17-18). Regarding claims 9 and 19, Manolakos discloses all the limitations of claims 7 and 17, respectively. Manolakos does not specifically disclose wherein the first PFL and the second PFL are configured without RS-P aggregation, and the first carrier phase of the first PFL and second carrier phase of the first PFL are measured separately from the third carrier phase of the second PFL and the fourth carrier phase of the second PFL, or wherein the first PFL and the second PFL are configured with RS-P aggregation, the first carrier phase of the first PFL and second carrier phase of the first PFL are measured jointly with the third carrier phase of the second PFL and the fourth carrier phase of the second PFL, and frequency information included in the at least one measurement report is based on an aggregated PFL that comprises the first PFL and the second PFL. CATT discloses wherein the first PFL and the second PFL are configured without RS-P aggregation, and the first carrier phase of the first PFL and second carrier phase of the first PFL are measured separately from the third carrier phase of the second PFL and the fourth carrier phase of the second PFL, or wherein the first PFL and the second PFL are configured with RS-P aggregation, the first carrier phase of the first PFL and second carrier phase of the first PFL are measured jointly with the third carrier phase of the second PFL and the fourth carrier phase of the second PFL, and frequency information included in the at least one measurement report is based on an aggregated PFL that comprises the first PFL and the second PFL (item [5.2], pages 17-18, “dl-PRS-ResourceBandwidth”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use CATT’s teachings wherein the first PFL and the second PFL are configured without RS-P aggregation, and the first carrier phase of the first PFL and second carrier phase of the first PFL are measured separately from the third carrier phase of the second PFL and the fourth carrier phase of the second PFL, or wherein the first PFL and the second PFL are configured with RS-P aggregation, the first carrier phase of the first PFL and second carrier phase of the first PFL are measured jointly with the third carrier phase of the second PFL and the fourth carrier phase of the second PFL, and frequency information included in the at least one measurement report is based on an aggregated PFL that comprises the first PFL and the second PFL with the simultaneous processing of multiple positioning frequency layers in NR by UR disclosed by Manolakos because one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that by with or without carrier aggregation constitutes a mere design consideration available to the inventor that depends on balancing performance gains against implementation costs and complexity, where using carrier aggregation would increase available bandwidth that improves data rates and capacity. Regarding claims 10 and 20, Manolakos discloses all the limitations of claims 1 and 11, respectively. Manolakos does not specifically disclose wherein the first carrier frequency is associated with a first subband and the second carrier frequency is associated with a second subband, and wherein the measured first carrier phase of the first PFL, the measured second carrier phase of the first PFL, or both, are reported differentially. CATT discloses item wherein the first carrier frequency is associated with a first subband and the second carrier frequency is associated with a second subband, and wherein the measured first carrier phase of the first PFL, the measured second carrier phase of the first PFL, or both, are reported differentially (item [5.2], pages 17-18, “reporting the carrier phase measurements corresponding to multiple carrier frequencies…”, “different sub-carriers” “different sub-bands”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use CATT’s teachings wherein the first carrier frequency is associated with a first subband and the second carrier frequency is associated with a second subband, and wherein the measured first carrier phase of the first PFL, the measured second carrier phase of the first PFL, or both, are reported differentially with the simultaneous processing of multiple positioning frequency layers in NR by UR disclosed by Manolakos because one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that such configuration would improve spectral efficiency. Regarding claims 22 and 27, Manolakos discloses all the limitations of claims 21 and 26, respectively. Manolakos does not specifically disclose wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is reported differentially relative to a reference carrier phase measurement associated with the same PFL or a different PFL, or wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is reported differentially relative to a reference transmission reception point (TRP), or wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is reported differentially relative to a reference subband of the reference TRP, or wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is reported differentially relative to a reference RS-P resource of the reference subband of the reference TRP. CATT discloses wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is reported differentially relative to a reference carrier phase measurement associated with the same PFL or a different PFL, or wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is reported differentially relative to a reference transmission reception point (TRP), or wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is reported differentially relative to a reference subband of the reference TRP, or wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is reported differentially relative to a reference RS-P resource of the reference subband of the reference TRP (item [5.2], pages 17-18, “reporting the carrier phase measurements corresponding to multiple carrier frequencies…”, “different sub-carriers” “different sub-bands”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use CATT’s teachings wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is reported differentially relative to a reference carrier phase measurement associated with the same PFL or a different PFL, or wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is reported differentially relative to a reference transmission reception point (TRP), or wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is reported differentially relative to a reference subband of the reference TRP, or wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is reported differentially relative to a reference RS-P resource of the reference subband of the reference TRP with the simultaneous processing of multiple positioning frequency layers in NR by UR disclosed by Manolakos because one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that such configuration would improve spectral efficiency. Regarding claim 23, Manolakos discloses all the limitations of claim 21. Manolakos does not specifically disclose performing one or more RS-P measurements associated with the RS-P occasion, wherein the one or more RS-P measurements are differentially reported in the measurement report or a different measurement report. CATT discloses performing one or more RS-P measurements associated with the RS-P occasion, wherein the one or more RS-P measurements are differentially reported in the measurement report or a different measurement report (item [5.2], pages 17-18, “reporting the carrier phase measurements corresponding to multiple carrier frequencies…”, “different sub-carriers” “different sub-bands”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use CATT’s teachings about CATT discloses performing one or more RS-P measurements associated with the RS-P occasion, wherein the one or more RS-P measurements are differentially reported in the measurement report or a different measurement report with the simultaneous processing of multiple positioning frequency layers in NR by UR disclosed by Manolakos because one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that by “reporting the carrier phase measurements corresponding to multiple carrier frequencies may significantly improve the positioning accuracy of the NR carrier phase positioning…” (CATT, item [5.2], pages 17-18). Regarding claims 25 and 30, Manolakos discloses all the limitations of claims 21 and 26, respectively. Manolakos does not specifically disclose wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is differentially reported relative to a measurement reference, and wherein the measurement reference is indicated in the measurement report based on the measurement reference being associated with a carrier phase differential of zero. CATT discloses wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is differentially reported relative to a measurement reference, and wherein the measurement reference is indicated in the measurement report based on the measurement reference being associated with a carrier phase differential of zero (item [5.2], pages 17-18, “the difference between the carrier phase measured from the DL PRS signal(s) of the target TRP and the carrier phase measured from DL PRS signal(s) of the reference TRP”, where a zero difference indicates synchronization and no relative phase shift). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use CATT’s teachings wherein the measured carrier phase of the PFL is differentially reported relative to a measurement reference, and wherein the measurement reference is indicated in the measurement report based on the measurement reference being associated with a carrier phase differential of zero with the simultaneous processing of multiple positioning frequency layers in NR by UR disclosed by Manolakos because one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that by having a phase differential of zero would indicate no relative phase shift. Regarding claim 29, Manolakos discloses all the limitations of claim 28. Manolakos does not specifically disclose wherein the measurement report indicates the measured carrier phase of the PFL differentially relative to the first measurement reference associated with the position estimation session of the UE, or wherein the measurement report indicates the measured carrier phase of the PFL differentially relative to a second measurement reference that is different than the first measurement reference, or wherein the recommendation of the first measurement reference is only for the differential carrier phase measurement reporting associated with the position estimation session of the UE, or wherein the recommendation of the first measurement reference is for any differential reporting associated with the position estimation session of the UE. CATT discloses wherein the measurement report indicates the measured carrier phase of the PFL differentially relative to the first measurement reference associated with the position estimation session of the UE, or wherein the measurement report indicates the measured carrier phase of the PFL differentially relative to a second measurement reference that is different than the first measurement reference, or wherein the recommendation of the first measurement reference is only for the differential carrier phase measurement reporting associated with the position estimation session of the UE, or wherein the recommendation of the first measurement reference is for any differential reporting associated with the position estimation session of the UE (item [5.2], pages 17-18, “the difference between the carrier phase measured from the DL PRS signal(s) of the target TRP and the carrier phase measured from DL PRS signal(s) of the reference TRP”, where a zero difference indicates synchronization and no relative phase shift). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use CATT’s teachings wherein the measurement report indicates the measured carrier phase of the PFL differentially relative to the first measurement reference associated with the position estimation session of the UE, or wherein the measurement report indicates the measured carrier phase of the PFL differentially relative to a second measurement reference that is different than the first measurement reference, or wherein the recommendation of the first measurement reference is only for the differential carrier phase measurement reporting associated with the position estimation session of the UE, or wherein the recommendation of the first measurement reference is for any differential reporting associated with the position estimation session of the UE with the simultaneous processing of multiple positioning frequency layers in NR by UR disclosed by Manolakos because one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that “reporting the carrier phase measurements corresponding to multiple carrier frequencies significantly improve the positioning accuracy of the NR carrier phase positioning…” (CATT, item [5.2], pages 17-18). Note: the Examiner agrees with the Written Opining cited in IDS dated 11/26/2024; therefore, it is being cited and quoted in this Office Action. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 07/15/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In the Remarks, the Applicant argues in substance: The claim interpretation has been withdrawn. “First, the PRS measurements described by Manolakos at [0097] are not "carrier phase measurements”…” The examiner respectfully disagrees with Applicant’s assertion that “the PRS measurements described by Manolakos at [0097] are not ‘carrier phase measurements’”. In 5G communications, PRS measurements are indeed referred as “phase measurements”, more specifically they are “carrier phase (CP measurements”. Carrier measurements capture the phase of the received carrier signal relative to a reference signal provided by either a base station or by the local oscillator. This provides a more granular distance estimation in line-of-sight situations. “Second, even assuming for the sake of argument that the measurements described by Manolakos at [0097] were interpreted as carrier-phase measurements, Manolakos would still not be suggestive of two carrier phase measurements associated with the same PFL at different carrier frequencies. …” Manolakos discloses in par. [0097], “the first PFL maybe on a first frequency band, and subsequent to receiving the first PRS resource and prior to the re-tuning the RF circuitry of the UE to the active BWP, the RF circuitry of the UE is tuned to a second frequency band, where the second PRS resource is received via the second frequency band”. “recited in independent claim 1 and similarly recited in independent claims 11, 13, 21, and 26… the Applicant respectfully submits that the above-noted independent claims are allowable over the cited art of record. The claims dependent thereon are likewise allowable at least by virtue of their dependence upon one of the above-noted independent claims.” The response to the arguments from above apply to independent claims 11, 13, 21, and 26 and their respective dependent claims. The examiner believes that a broad and reasonable interpretation has been given to the claims, in view of the specification, and believes that the prior art cited read on the claims as presently written; therefore, the rejection is maintained. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US-20230262648-A1 relates to sidelink angular-based and SL RRM-based positioning. US-20230180173-A1 relates to user equipment positioning measurement procedures under active bandwidth part switching. US-20240159855-A1 relates to signaling for enabling carrier phase-based positioning in a wireless communication system. US-20250024479-A1 relates to systems and methods for positioning. US-20250254646-A1 relates to systems and methods for carrier phase positioning. US-20230262649-A1 relates to positioning measurement method and apparatus and communication device. US-20230239093-A1 relates to reference signal resource processing method and apparatus, device and readable storage medium. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Angelica Perez whose telephone number is 571-272-7885. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Yuwen (Kevin) Pan can be reached at (571) 272-7855. The fax phone numbers for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned are 571-273-8300 for regular communications and for After Final communications. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either the PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through the Private PAIR only. For more information about the pair system, see http://pair- direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll- free). Information regarding Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system can be found at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application or proceeding should be directed to the TC 2600's customer service number is 703-306-0377. /Angelica M. Perez/ Primary Patent Examiner AU 2649
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 10, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 15, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750440
METHOD AND SERVER SYSTEM FOR COUPLING A TERMINAL OF A USER TO SMART GLASSES OF A COMMUNICATION DEVICE OF A CALL PARTNER
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750691
TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12732918
CROSS-CHANNEL SIGNAL STRENGTH MEASUREMENT CORRECTION FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732142
RADIO TRANSMITTER
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726913
CROSS-CHANNEL SIGNAL STRENGTH MEASUREMENT CORRECTION FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.7%)
2y 11m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 791 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month