Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/662,368

SOLID-STATE FREQUENCY AGILE FILTER FOR LIDAR: MULTILAYER OPTICAL DESIGN AND EXOTIC PHASE-CHANGE MATERIALS-BASED ACTIVE TUNING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 13, 2024
Examiner
MARTINEZ, JOSEPH P
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
771 granted / 897 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
917
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§102
44.5%
+4.5% vs TC avg
§112
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 897 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 5-13-24 and 5-20-24 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-10 and 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Borg et al. (US20230336846) in view of Wagner et al. (US20040234198). Re claim 1, Borg et al. teaches for example in fig. 2, an all-solid-state frequency agile filter system (104, para. 0035), comprising: a substrate exhibiting (104, para. 0039) transparency in a wavelength band selected within the range of 500 nm to 15 μm (para. 0030, 0031, 0041); including at least one tunable cavity (para. 0035) comprising an exotic phase change material (para. 0035); and multiple optical layers (para. 0035). But, Borg et al. fails to explicitly teach multiple cavities. However, within the same field of endeavor, Wagner et al. teaches for example in fig. 3, 5, and 7, multiple cavities (para. 0043). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify the teachings of Borg et al. with Wagner et al. in order to provide variable transmission at a fixed wavelength, as taught by Wagner et al. (para. 0043). Re claim 2, Borg et al. further teaches for example in fig. 2, the exotic phase change material is a chalcogenide material (para. 0035). Re claim 3, Borg et al. further teaches for example in fig. 2, the chalcogenide material is a compound consisting of at least one chalcogen anion selected from the group consisting of O, S, Se, Te, and Po (para. 0035). Re claim 4, Borg et al. further teaches for example in fig. 2, the compound is selected from the group consisting of GeSbTe, SbS, and GeSbSeTe (para. 0035). Re claim 5, Wagner et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5, and 7, the substrate is selected from the group consisting of calcium fluoride, germanium, silicon, potassium bromide, sodium chloride, magnesium fluoride, sapphire, zinc selenide, and zinc sulfide (para. 0031, 0060). Re claim 6, Borg et al. further teaches for example in fig. 2, the multiple optical layers include a Fabry-Perot arrangement comprising multiple distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs) each consisting of multi-layer dielectric mirrors (para. 0035). Re claim 7, Wagner et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5, and 7, each of the multiple cavities is embedded between distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs) (para. 0036, 0047). Re claim 8, Wagner et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5, and 7, including an etalon component (para. 0006, 0045-0047, 0050). Re claim 9, Wagner et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5, and 7, multiple passive cavities (para. 0041). Re claim 10, Wagner et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5, and 7, one tunable cavity and two passive cavities (para. 0041). Re claim 12, Wagner et al. further teaches for example in fig. 3, 5, and 7, one of the three passive cavities is an etalon-like cavity (para. 0045). Re claim 13, Borg et al. further teaches for example in fig. 2, the at least one tunable cavity is electrically tunable between a first and second state commensurate with transmission of a first and second wavelength (para. 0036). Re claim 14, Borg et al. further teaches for example in fig. 2, the exotic phase change material is electrically reversible between an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase (para. 0040). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 11 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 15-20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the prior art taken alone or in combination fails to anticipate or fairly suggest the limitations of the claims, in such a manner that a rejection would be proper. The prior art fails to teach a combination of all the claimed features as presented in dependent claim 11 and independent claim 15. Specifically regarding claim 11, Borg et al. (US20230336846) teaches the state of the art of a differential absorption light detection and ranging filter. But, Borg et al. fails to explicitly teach a combination of all the claimed features including two tunable cavities and three passive cavities, as claimed. Specifically regarding claim 15, Borg et al. (US20230336846) teaches the state of the art of a differential absorption light detection and ranging filter. But, Borg et al. fails to explicitly teach a combination of all the claimed features including the following solid-state material layers: a substrate exhibiting transparency in a wavelength band selected within the range of 500 nm to 15 μm; a first distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) consisting of N bi-layers of alternating high and low index materials; a first electrically tunable cavity, including an exotic phase change material; a second distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) consisting of N bi-layers of alternating high and low index materials; a first passive cavity; a third distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) consisting of N bi-layers of alternating high and low index materials; a passive etalon-like cavity; a fourth distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) consisting of N bi-layers of alternating high and low index materials; a second passive cavity; a fifth distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) consisting of N bi-layers of alternating high and low index materials; a second electrically tunable cavity, including an exotic phase change material; and a sixth distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) consisting of N bi-layers of alternating high and low index materials, as claimed. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH P MARTINEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-2335. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9am to 7pm PACIFIC. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bumsuk Won can be reached at (571) 272-2713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Joseph P Martinez/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872 8-28-26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 13, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 09, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769135
OPTICAL MODULE FOR NEAR-EYE DISPLAY DEVICE AND NEAR-EYE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12761452
OPTICAL LENS
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761485
HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12748286
IMAGING OPTICAL SYSTEM, IMAGE CAPTURING DEVICE AND MOBILE TERMINAL
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748301
Color Changing Materials Arranged in Slow Particle Coloration Materials
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+3.2%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 897 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month