Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/662,614

ELEVATOR FOR TUBULAR HANDLING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 13, 2024
Examiner
LAMBE, PATRICK F
Art Unit
3676
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Weatherford Technology Holdings LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
364 granted / 585 resolved
+10.2% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
629
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.5%
+10.5% vs TC avg
§102
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 585 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/26/26 has been entered. The amended claims filed 1/26/26 are acknowledged; claims 1-20 are currently pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-5, 8-11, 14, and 16-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Weidecke (EP 3176362, as cited by Applicant) in view of Zheng (US 20160290073). CLAIM 1: Weidecke discloses an elevator (20) for use with a subterranean well. The elevator comprises an elevator housing (23); a slip assembly axially displaceable relative to the elevator housing (via pistons 21), the slip assembly comprising multiple slips (22) configured to grip an outer surface of a tubular disposed in the slip assembly, the slip assembly having open and closed configurations (see Fig. 1A); and a load indicator (27, sensor 1050 as shown in Fig. 9A-D) configured to prevent actuation of the slip assembly from the closed configuration to the open configuration when at least a predetermined load is supported (via indicator 1057 and signals to control system). Weidecke fails to disclose the load indicator configured to transfer load between the slip assembly and elevator housing, or the load indicator supporting the load. Zheng discloses an instrumented drilling rig slip. Zheng discloses load cells (700) placed to support slips (308) and the associated load, transferring the load to the support beneath them (structure 702) (see Fig. 7). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the placement of the load cells in Weidecke to be transfer the load with a reasonable expectation of success as Zheng teaches that such a configuration allows for accurate measurement of the weight (paragraph 0065). CLAIM 2: The slip assembly further comprises an outer housing having a radially enlarged flange, and the load indicator is positioned axially between the flange and the elevator housing (see Fig. 8A). CLAIM 3: The load indicator comprises a first ring that contacts the slip assembly, a second ring that contacts the elevator housing (see Fig. 9A). A position indicator (sensor 1050) configured to indicate when the predetermined load is applied to the first and second rings. CLAIM 4: The position indicator includes a valve (such as 45, 47, 49). CLAIM 5: The load indicator further comprises at least one spring configured to bias the first and second rings away from each other (spring in valve 49). CLAIM 8: A control system (40) configured to apply pressure to the slip assembly to actuate the slip assembly from the open configuration to the closed configuration, and in which the load indicator is configured to prevent the pressure from being applied to actuate the slip assembly to the open configuration when the predetermined load is supported by the structure. CLAIMS 9-11, 14: These methods are inherent to the above structures. CLAIM 16: Weidecke discloses a system for use with a subterranean well. The system comprises a spider (30) configured to support a tubular and an elevator (20) axially displaceable relative to the spider. The elevator being configured to support the tubular, and the elevator comprising a slip assembly (see above), an elevator housing (23) and a load indicator (see above), the load indicator being configured to prevent actuation of the slip assembly to an open configuration when the elevator supports the tubular. Zheng discloses load cells (700) placed to support slips (308) and the associated load, transferring the load to the support beneath them (structure 702) (see Fig. 7). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the placement of the load cells in Weidecke to be transfer the load with a reasonable expectation of success as Zheng teaches that such a configuration allows for accurate measurement of the weight (paragraph 0065). CLAIM 17: The load indicator comprises a valve configured to prevent application of pressure from a control system to the slip assembly to actuate the slip assembly to the open configuration when the elevator supports the tubular (such as valves 45, 47, 49). CLAIM 18: The load indicator comprises first and second rings that surround the slip assembly (see Fig. 9A). Claim(s) 6, 7, 12, 13, 15, 19, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Weidecke in view of Zheng in further view of Brown (US 20150034335). CLAIM 4: Weidecke-Zheng discloses the elements of claim 3 as discussed above. Weidecke further discloses in which the position indicator comprises a valve, but the valve is different than the valve of the further dependent claims. Brown discloses a spider (10). Brown discloses a load indicator (sensor 28) that is connected to the control system 100. The sensor comprises a valve (28). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the position indicator of Weidecke to include the valve of Brown with a reasonable expectation of success as the substitution of one known activation means for another in which the sensor would serve the same function of determining the load present. CLAIM 6: The spring comprises a fluid spring (Brown, paragraph 0038). CLAIM 7: The fluid spring is pressurized when the slip assembly is in the open configuration (Brown, paragraph 0038). CLAIM 12: Weidecke-Zheng discloses the elements of claim 11 as described above. Weidecke fails to disclose in which the spring comprises a fluid spring, and the compressing further comprises expelling fluid from the fluid spring. Brown discloses an indicator with a fluid spring (28) compressed (Fig. 4, paragraph 0038). CLAIM 13: The compressing comprises reducing a distance between first and second rings of the load indicator, each of the first and second rings surrounding the slip assembly (Brown, paragraph 0038; Fig. 4). CLAIM 15: This method is inherent to the above structure. CLAIM 19: Weidecke-Zheng discloses the elements of claim 18 as described above. Weidecke fails to disclose in which the load indicator further comprises a spring that biases the first and second rings away from each other. Brown discloses a spring (28) to bias the plates. CLAIM 20: The spring comprises a fluid spring (paragraph 0038). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) filed 1/26/26 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. The arrangement of the slips, housing, and load indicators are not taught by the previous rejection, but addressed above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK F LAMBE whose telephone number is (571)270-1932. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 10-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Anderson can be reached at (571)270-5281. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK F LAMBE/Examiner, Art Unit 3676 /TARA SCHIMPF/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3676
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 13, 2024
Application Filed
May 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 06, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595711
CUTTING TOOL AND CONTROLS FOR DOWNHOLE MECHANICAL SERVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12540521
Electrical Drilling and Production Systems and Methods
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12503928
SELF CLEANING FRACKING PLUG AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12497878
ELECTRICALLY POWERED PUMPING UNIT WITH REMOVABLE PUMP MODULES
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12460506
VALVES FOR WELL SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF OPERATING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 04, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+29.4%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 585 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month