Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/662,675

AUDIO CAPTION ALIGNMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS, MEDIUM, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 13, 2024
Examiner
BECKER, TYLER JUSTIN
Art Unit
2657
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
BEIJING YOUZHUJU NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
14 granted / 19 resolved
+11.7% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
41
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§103
45.4%
+5.4% vs TC avg
§102
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 19 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to the application filed on May 13th, 2024. Claims 1-20 are pending and have been examined. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6, 13, and 20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 6, 13, and 20 each recite the limitation "the first fragment of audio feature information" in the preamble. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. As such, it is unclear whether the limitation is referring to the “first audio feature information” of each “first target audios”, the first occurring “first audio feature information” of the “first target audios”, a first fragment of the “first audio feature information”, or another element of the claims. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 contain subject matter not found during the prior art search. As such, claims 1-5, 7-12, and 14-20 are allowable, and claims 6, 13, and 20 would be allowable if amended to overcome the current rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the prior art search did not yield any references that disclosed the limitation “obtaining target audio feature information of the target audio by concatenating all of the first audio feature information in a case that the duration of the target audio is less than or equal to a second preset duration, wherein the second preset duration is greater than the first preset duration” before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, nor any references that would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have combined to yield the abovementioned limitation before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. As such, especially in combination with the other limitations of claim 1, claim 1 is found to contain allowable subject matter. Regarding claims 8 and 15, the claims recite limitations comparable to claim 1, and thus contain allowable subject matter for the same reasons as stated above with regards to claim 1. Regarding claims 2-7, 9-14, and 16-20, each of these claims depends on one of the independent claims discussed above, or on another dependent claim, and therefore incorporates all limitations therefrom. As such, claims 2-7, 9-14, and 16-20 contain allowable subject matter for at least the same reasons as stated above with regards to claims 1, 8, and 15. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Shin, Dongchan (US Pat. No. 11,972,752 B2) discloses a method for detecting speech segment from audio considering length of speech segment. Hornsby et al. (US Pat. Pub. No. 2021/0067836 A1) discloses a subtitle splitter. Knighton et al. (US Pat. No. 9,571,638 B1) discloses a method for segment-based queueing for audio captioning. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TYLER J BECKER whose telephone number is (703)756-1271. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th, 7:15am-5:45pm PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Washburn can be reached at (571) 272-5551. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TYLER BECKER/ Examiner, Art Unit 2657 /DANIEL C WASHBURN/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2657
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 13, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597433
SPEECH SIGNAL ENHANCEMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585893
Full Media Translator
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12518777
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTHENTICATION USING SOUND-BASED VOCALIZATION ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12499869
SOUND SYNTHESIS METHOD, SOUND SYNTHESIS APPARATUS, AND RECORDING MEDIUM STORING INSTRUCTIONS TO PERFORM SOUND SYNTHESIS METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12499311
Language Model Preprocessing with Weighted N-grams
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+19.0%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 19 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month