Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/663,036

CONNECTION TERMINAL

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
May 13, 2024
Priority
May 29, 2023 — JP 2023-087380
Examiner
GUSHI, ROSS N
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1254 granted / 1494 resolved
+15.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1524
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§102
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1494 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cameron et al. US 5685730 (“Cameron”). Regarding claim 5, Cameron discloses a male terminal 10 including a male-side contact portion formed in a cylindrical shape; and a female terminal 12 including a female-side contact portion formed in a cylindrical shape and having a linear slit 22 formed in an axial direction, wherein the female terminal has an insertion space formed inside the female-side contact portion and into which the male-side contact portion is inserted, and a base portion located (at lead line 12 in figure 1) at a position facing the slit across the insertion space, the female terminal has a protrusion (14, 16) protruding inward in the radial direction from an inner circumferential surface of the female-side contact portion, the male terminal has a recess (18, 20) which is recessed inward in the radial direction from an outer circumferential surface of the male-side contact portion and into which the protrusion is inserted when in an insertion state in which the male-side contact portion is inserted into the insertion space, and the recess has a pair of facing surfaces facing each other in a circumferential direction with the protrusion interposed therebetween. Claim Rejections - and 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Varrin US 3406376 in view of Powell US 4209895. Regarding claim 1, Varrin discloses a connection terminal comprising: a male terminal 11 including a male-side contact portion formed in a cylindrical shape; and a female terminal including a female-side contact portion 10 formed in a cylindrical shape and having a linear slit (see at 10c/10d in figure 3) formed in an axial direction, wherein the female terminal has an insertion space formed inside the female-side contact portion and into which the male-side contact portion is inserted, and a base portion (labeled BP in annotated figure 3 below) located at a position facing the slit across the insertion space; the female-side contact portion includes a pair of indent portions (18, 20) protruding inward in a radial direction from both end portions (10c, 10d) having the slit interposed therebetween in a circumferential direction, and The female-side contact portion is capable of being elastically bent outward in a radial direction intersecting the axial direction with the base portion as a bending starting point and applies an elastic contact load to the male-side contact portion when in an insertion state in which the male-side contact portion is inserted into the insertion space. Varrin does not specifically disclose that the female side contact is bent outwards when used with the male terminal. Powell discloses that in use with a male terminal, female terminals such as taught in Varrin (col. 1, lines 30-40) have the female terminal sidewalls deflect outwardly about a single point D opposite the slot (Powell at col. 2, lines 50-65, figure 1). It would have been obvious to size the Varrin male terminal 11 such that the sidewalls of the Varrin female terminal are flexed outwardly, as noted in Powell. The reason would have been to provide a secure reliable electrical connection between the male and female terminals as was known in the art. PNG media_image1.png 1068 996 media_image1.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Varrin does not disclose indent portions. The examiner maintains that Varrin does, at 18 and 20. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROSS N GUSHI whose telephone number is (571)272-2005. The examiner can normally be reached Monday – Friday 8:00AM – 5PM EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koehler, can be reached at (571)272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROSS N GUSHI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Oct 07, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771065
FLOATING CONNECTOR AND CONTACT FOR SUCH A FLOATING CONNECTOR
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771050
INSULATION PIERCING CONNECTOR ASSEMBLIES WITH CAPTIVE CABLE END CAPS
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771079
HIGH-VOLTAGE CONNECTOR HAVING A PRE-CHARGE RESISTOR
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763511
CABLE CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763495
Connecting Terminal
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+2.2%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1494 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month