Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/663,849

BONE SEGMENT TRANSLATION SYSTEM

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 14, 2024
Examiner
HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA
Art Unit
3773
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Blue Ocean Global Corp.
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
799 granted / 1025 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1058
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
35.6%
-4.4% vs TC avg
§102
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1025 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office action is in response to the amendment filed 01/27/2026. Claims 1, 3-38 and 20-22 are pending. Claim Objections Claim 20 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 20, change 19 to --18--. Claim 19 has been canceled. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-18 and 20-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Ottoboni et al. (U.S. 2024/0407807 A1). Concerning claim 1, Ottoboni et al. disclose an external fixation element (see Fig. 9B), the external fixation element comprising a frame (900) with an aperture configured and sized to receive one or more body structures of a subject therethrough; a first block (204) fixed to the external fixation element; a second block (202) movably coupled to the first block; and a plurality of pins (400) coupled to the second block the plurality of pins being configured to be affixed to a bone segment of a bone within one of the one or more body structures of the subject; wherein the second block is configured to move the bone segment of the bone in a transverse direction substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the bone. [AltContent: textbox (Floor)][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image1.png 683 591 media_image1.png Greyscale Concerning claim 3, further comprising a targeting guide (see Fig. 5M, element 104), the targeting guide being configured for aligning the plurality of pins (400) with the bone segment. Concerning claim 4, wherein the targeting guide comprises a plurality of open-ended slots (see Fig. 5M, element 134), wherein respective ones of the plurality of open-ended slots engage respective ones of the plurality of pins (400). Concerning claim 6, wherein the second block is movably coupled to the first block by a threaded adjustment element (see Fig. 2A, element 224). Concerning claim 7, wherein rotation of the threaded adjustment element causes the second block to move in the transverse direction with respect to the longitudinal axis of the bone (see par. 0081). Concerning claim 8, wherein: the rotation of the threaded adjustment element in a first rotational direction causes the second block to move in a first transverse direction with respect to the longitudinal axis of the bone; the rotation of the threaded adjustment element in a second rotational direction causes the second block to move in a second transverse direction with respect to the longitudinal axis of the bone; and the second transverse direction is opposite the first transverse direction. Concerning claim 9, further comprising a stroke limiting element (see par. 0082 – since the rod is fixedly secured to opening 227, rotation of threaded adjustment element is prevented once block 202 makes contact with block 204), wherein the rotation of the threaded adjustment element is limited by the stroke limiting element. Concerning claim 10, wherein the stroke limiting element comprises a floor (see Fig. 9B above) that prevents the rotation of the threaded adjustment element beyond a designated distance. Concerning claim 11, further comprising an additional external fixation element (see Fig. 9B, element 900), wherein the external fixation element and the additional external fixation element are coupled to each other through one or more struts (903) disposed between and connected to the external fixation element and the additional external fixation element. Concerning claim 12, wherein the frame of the external fixation element comprises at least one of a circular-shaped frame and an oval-shaped frame. Concerning claim 13, Ottoboni et al. disclose a bone segment translation system (see Fig. 9B) comprising: an external fixation element (900), the external fixation element comprising a frame with an aperture configured and sized to receive one or more body structures of a subject therethrough; a pin supporting element (202) movably coupled to the external fixation element; and a plurality of pins (400) connected to the pin supporting element, the plurality of pins being configured to be affixed to a bone segment of a bone within one of the one or more body structures of the subject; wherein the pin supporting element is configured to move the bone segment of the bone in a transverse direction substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the bone. Concerning claim 14, wherein the pin supporting element is movably coupled to the external fixation element via a fixed block (204) coupled to the external fixation element. Concerning claim 15, further comprising a threaded adjustment element (see Fig. 2A, element 224) disposed in the fixed block and engaged with the pin supporting element. Concerning claim 16, wherein rotation of the threaded adjustment element causes the pin supporting element to move in the transverse direction with respect to the longitudinal axis of the bone (see par. 0082). Concerning claim 17, wherein the frame of the external fixation element comprises at least one of a circular-shaped frame and an oval-shaped frame. Concerning claim 18, Ottoboni et al. disclose a bone segment translation system comprising: a frame (see Fig. 9B, element 900) configured to be disposed around a bone of a subject, the frame having an aperture configured and size to receive the bone of the subject therethrough; a first block (204) fixed to the frame; a second block (202) movably coupled to the first block; and one or more pins (400) coupled to the second block, the one or more pins being configured to be affixed to a bone segment of the bone of the subject; wherein the second block is configured to move the bone segment of the bone in a transverse direction substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the bone. Concerning claim 20, further comprising a threaded adjustment element (see Fig. 2A, element 224) disposed in the second block and engaged with the second block, wherein rotation of the threaded adjustment element causes the second block to move in the transverse direction with respect to the longitudinal axis of the bone (see par. 0082). Concerning claim 21, wherein the first block (204) is affixed to the external fixation element at a fixed distance from the bone. Concerning claim 22, wherein the second block (202) is configured to retract the bone segment from the bone. Concerning claim 5, wherein the targeting guide comprises a plurality of angled slots (see fig. 1D below) configured for receiving a blade of a bone saw to cut out the bone segment from the bone. [AltContent: textbox (Angled slots)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image2.png 789 557 media_image2.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 01/27/2026 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELLEN HAMMOND whose telephone number is (571)270-3819. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8 - 4 PM . If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo C. Robert, at 571 272-4719. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ELLEN C HAMMOND/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3773
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 14, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 16, 2026
Interview Requested
Jan 22, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 22, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 27, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Final Rejection — §102
Apr 13, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599409
HINGEAPPARATUS FOR EXTERNAL BONE FIXATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599410
MULTI-CLAMP APPARATUS FOR EXTERNAL BONE FIXATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12582393
RETRACTOR FOR SPINAL SURGERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575940
INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANTS, INSTRUMENTS, AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569282
Tissue Retraction And Vertebral Displacement Devices, Systems, And Methods For Posterior Spinal Fusion
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+12.1%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1025 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month