Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/664,252

SELECTING SUBSETS OF WIRELESS DEVICES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 14, 2024
Examiner
SMARTH, GERALD A
Art Unit
2478
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
649 granted / 779 resolved
+25.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
802
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
83.5%
+43.5% vs TC avg
§102
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 779 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION 1. It is hereby acknowledged that 18/664252 following papers have been received and placed of record in the file: Remark date 05/14/24 2. The present application, file on or after March 16, 2013, is being examiner under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 3. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Objections 4. Claims 1-20 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 1, 7 and 18 discloses , ….wherein the subset of second wireless devices is a subset of the set of second wireless devices… This limitation is vague. It would seem obvious that a subset is part of a set of that device. Claim 13 states…. wherein the subset of wireless devices is a subset of the set of wireless devices. For similar reasons as above the limitation is vague. The claim further states….transmit a second message, in response to the first message, if the first wireless device satisfies the set of one or more of multiple types of information. By using the term if it can be considered that this limitation does not necessarily need to occur. Applicant may consider using when instead. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 5.The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 6.Claim(s) 13-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Richards et al et al (US 2019/0312933A1) Regarding claim 13, Richards teaches a first wireless device for wireless communication, comprising: at least one memory; and at least one processor coupled with the at least one memory and configured to cause the first wireless device to: receive a first message that indicates to initiate a procedure for a subset of wireless devices based at least in part on a set of one or more of multiple types of information stored in a set of wireless devices, wherein the subset of wireless devices is a subset of the set of wireless devices, (see Richard Fig.2A paragraph [0077], [0081] explains… After collecting the plurality of raw data items from the subset of the plurality of machines in response to the data collection request, function module 280 of server system 108 analyzes the plurality of raw data items collected from the subset of the plurality of machines 206-218. Specifically, in accordance with the schema definition, function module 280 obtains a first subset of raw data items that have the one or more third data types, derives a set of data items having the first data type and second data type based on the first subset of raw data items, and organizes the set of derived data items according to the data structure defined in the schema definition.) and wherein the first wireless device is part of the set of wireless devices; (see Richard paragraph [0077], [0081] explains… After collecting the plurality of raw data items from the subset of the plurality of machines in response to the data collection request, function module 280 of server system 108 analyzes the plurality of raw data items collected from the subset of the plurality of machines 206-218. Specifically, in accordance with the schema definition, function module 280 obtains a first subset of raw data items that have the one or more third data types, derives a set of data items having the first data type and second data type based on the first subset of raw data items, and organizes the set of derived data items according to the data structure defined in the schema definition. ) transmit a second message, in response to the first message, if the first wireless device satisfies the set of one or more of multiple types of information. (see Richard paragraph [0077], [0081] explains… After collecting the plurality of raw data items from the subset of the plurality of machines in response to the data collection request, function module 280 of server system 108 analyzes the plurality of raw data items collected from the subset of the plurality of machines 206-218. Specifically, in accordance with the schema definition, function module 280 obtains a first subset of raw data items that have the one or more third data types, derives a set of data items having the first data type and second data type based on the first subset of raw data items, and organizes the set of derived data items according to the data structure defined in the schema definition. ) Regarding claim 14, Richard taught the first wireless device of claim 13, as described above. Richard further teaches wherein the set of one or more of multiple types of information stored in the first wireless device include one or more of a device identifier (ID) of the first wireless device, a device type of the first wireless device, a memory storage capability of the first wireless device, a security capability of the first wireless device, a positioning capability of the first wireless device, a network ID of a network operator of the first wireless device, a manufacturer ID of the first wireless device, a service ID of one or more services the first wireless device is subscribed to, or a random value.(see paragraph[0077],[0087], [0147] explains… network node information 622b that includes information identifying one or more nodes known to be coupled to network 100, where in some embodiments, computer system 600b maintains a record of nodes currently known to be coupled to the managed network and their respective unique identifiers(e.g., IP addresses and optionally other unique identifiers), and optionally, computer system 600b also maintains the ordinal positions of these machines in a sorted sequence according to their respective unique identifiers) Regarding claim 15, Richard taught the first wireless device of claim 14, as described above. Richard further teaches wherein the set of one or more of multiple types of information are stored in non-volatile memory of the first wireless device. .( see paragraph[0077],[0087],[0150],[00153] explains storage ) Regarding claim 16, Richard taught the first wireless device of claim 13, as described above. Richard further teaches wherein the procedure comprises an inventory or command procedure.( see paragraph[0077],[0087],[0150],[00153] explains storage for data collection and more) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Gerald Smarth whose telephone number is (571) 270-1923. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday 6am-4:30pm ET. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Avellino can be reached on 571-272-7784. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GERALD A SMARTH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2478
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12671980
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION METHODS AND APPARATUSES, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICES AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666426
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING PUCCH ON DETERMINED PUCCH RESOURCE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665689
PRECISION TIME PROTOCOL REDUNDANCY AND LOAD BALANCING ACROSS A SET OF ACTIVE TIME SERVERS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12652244
COMMUNICATION METHOD IN SOFTWARE-DEFINED WIDE AREA NETWORKS (SD-WAN) AND RELATED APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12647959
USER EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY SIGNALING FOR MEASUREMENT GAP ENHANCEMENTS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+12.8%)
2y 11m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 779 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month