Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/664,421

PACKAGING TRAY

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
May 15, 2024
Examiner
REYNOLDS, STEVEN ALAN
Art Unit
3735
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Magnolia White Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
1113 granted / 1697 resolved
-4.4% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
1747
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
44.5%
+4.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1697 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to the reply filed on 12/8/2025, wherein claims 1-2 were amended. Claims 3-19 remain withdrawn from consideration. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is rendered indefinite by the limitation “and each extending along a side surface”, in line 7, since it is unclear what structure is extending along a side surface. For examination purposes, Examiner interprets the limitation as “and each protrusion extending along a side surface”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hong et al. (US 2015/0041361). Regarding claim 1, Hong discloses a packaging tray (See Fig. 1) comprising: a housing part (at 200) housing a flat-plate-shaped member (P1) to be housed (when 200 is placed on 100), including a glass plate member; a holding part (at 100) covering the member to be housed and the housing part to hold the member (when 200 is placed on 100) to be housed in a direction different from a direction of the housing part; and a plurality of protrusions (at 130) provided in the holding part, protruding toward the housing part, and each extending along a side surface (e.g. top horizontal surface of P1 in Fig. 4) of the member to be housed in an extension direction (left to right direction in Fig. 4) in which the side surface extends, wherein each protrusion includes a first region (bottom-left corner of 130 in Fig. 4 - See Fig. 4 labeled below) between its end surface (See Fig. 4 labeled below) and center in the extension direction and a second region (See Fig. 4 labeled below) different from the first region, and a shape of each protrusion in the first region differs from a shape of the protrusion in the second region, the end surface has a first width (See Fig. 4 labeled below) extending along a first direction different from the extension direction, the first region contacts the second region at a connecting surface, the connecting surface has a second width (See Fig. 4 labeled below) along the first direction, and the first width is smaller than the second width. PNG media_image1.png 788 1126 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Hong discloses each protrusion has a taper-shaped holding side surface coming into contact with the side surface of the member to be housed to hold the member to be housed in the extension direction, a length of the holding side surface is smaller than a length of the side surface of the member to be housed in the extension direction, and the holding side surface in the first region is further away from the side surface of the member to be housed when getting closer to an end portion in the extension direction (as shown in Fig. 4). Response to Arguments In view of Applicant's amendment, a new interpretation of the Hong et al. (US 2015/0041361) reference has been identified and applied. Applicant's arguments have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN A REYNOLDS whose telephone number is (571)272-9959. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Stashick can be reached at (571) 272-4561. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVEN A. REYNOLDS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 15, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Dec 08, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600549
Header Bag for Packaging at Least One Medical Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595092
IMPROVED STATIONERY PAPER PACKAGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595955
MODULAR BOX ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583661
CHIP STORING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569406
AM/PM MULTI-DAY PILL CONTAINER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+23.6%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1697 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month