Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/665,151

Dual Action Retention Mechanism

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 15, 2024
Priority
Nov 06, 2020 — provisional 63/110,492 +3 more
Examiner
TOLAN, EDWARD THOMAS
Art Unit
3725
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1063 granted / 1363 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1399
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.8%
+14.8% vs TC avg
§102
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
§112
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1363 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group II claims in the reply filed on 6-5-2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that Groups I and II are not a combination/subcombination. This is found persuasive because although independent claim 9 includes a die pin cavity and lateral surface limitations the dependent claims 10,12 and 13 appear to contain similar limitations as in independent claim 1. Groups I and II are examined in this office action with Group III claims remaining withdrawn. The restriction is made final. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shimota et al. (2007/0144232). Shimota discloses a release assembly (1230,1235) for a die (1200; Figs. 12A,12B) comprising a die release button (BU) that includes a button body (1230) having opposing ends (Fig. 12A) configured to receive an actuating force (F; Fig. 12B and return force [0138], lines 1-5 and [0139], lines 1-5). The button body (1230) has a slot (1260,1232) that extends through (a distance within) the button body between a first slot end (1260) and a second slot end (1232) wherein the second slot end (1232) defines a notch (cam surface; Fig. 12B, [0136], lines 9-15) having opposed ramp surfaces including a left side of second slot end (1232) which is an inclined ramp along which a die pin end (1238) moves (Fig. 12B) and a right side of second slot end (1232) which is a bottom ramp in which die pin end (1238) seats (Fig. 12A). A die pin (1235) is selectively received by being insertable into the slot (1260,1232) at the first slot end where it abuts first slot end (1260; Fig. 12A) with a button engaging portion (1238) and the die pin (1235) is movable between a retention (locked) orientation (Fig. 12A) and a release (unlocked) orientation (Fig. 12B). Regarding claim 2, the die pin (1235) includes a button engaging portion (die pin end 1238) and a die engaging portion (1237) opposite the button engaging portion (Fig. 12A). Regarding claims 3 and 4, Shimota discloses a biasing element spring (1240) that biases the die pin (1235) toward a center (bottom ramp end of second slot end 1232) of the notch in an axial direction of the die release button (1230; Fig. 12A) and the biasing element (1240) is constructed to urge the die engaging portion (1238) toward and away from the button body (1230). Regarding claim 5, Shimota discloses a detent (1210) which provides a locking arrangement with die pin (1235; Figs. 12A,12B). Regarding claim 6, the first slot end (1260) is rectangular profile (wall; Fig. 12B) which is constructed to block movement of the button engaging portion (1238) of the die pin (1235; Fig. 12A). Claim(s) 1-3,7 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sakamoto (WO 2010/106902). Sakamoto discloses a release assembly (40,45) for use with a die (5), the release assembly comprising a die release button (45) including a body (46) having a first end (top end; Fig. 6B) to receive a first actuating force (push in; page 17, lines 5-6) and a second end (bottom end; Fig. 6A) to receive a second actuating force (push up; page 17, line 4), the body (46) including a slot (bifurcation; 46B) between a first slot end (longitudinal part of bifurcation 46B; Fig. 8B) and a second slot end (inclined part 50 of bifurcation 46B; Fig. 8B), the second slot end (inclined part of bifurcation 50; Fig. 8B) including a notch (where 50 is pointing; Fig. 8B) having a first ramped surface (left incline 50; Fig. 8B; page 16, line 6) and a second ramped surface (right incline 50; Fig. 8B; page 16, line 6), and a die pin (41) selectively received by the first slot end (page 16, lines 16-19), the die pin moveable (page 17, lines 6-8) with respect to the first slot end (longitudinal part of bifurcation 46B; Fig. 8B) between a retention orientation (Fig. 6A) and a release orientation (Fig. 6B). Regarding claim 2, the die pin (41) includes a button engaging portion (51, Fig. 8A) and a die engaging portion (41a) on an opposite end of the pin (41) from the button engaging portion (51). Regarding claim 3, a biasing element (spring, 42) that urges the die engaging portion (41a) away from the body (46, Fig. 6A; page 15, lines 14-17) and into the die sleeve hole (26b). Regarding claim 7, the die pin (41) includes a square key (plate, 41c) to engage the button body (46) along the ramps (50). Regarding claim 8, the square key (41c) includes a stepped profile (41a,41c,51) which centers the die pin (41) within the slot (Fig. 6A) to prohibit the button engaging portion (51) from disengaging (page 16, lines 17-19). Claim(s) 9-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Khansa et al. (11,623,265). Regarding claim 9, Khansa discloses ram head (200,400; Fig. 5A) defining a die pin cavity (210; Fig. 10A), the die pin cavity (210) including a first lateral surface extending on a first side of the ram head (left side where 210 is pointing; Fig. 10A) and a second lateral surface extending along a second side of the ram head (right side opposite of where 210 is pointing; Fig. 10A) wherein the first side is opposite of the second side across the ram head. Khansa discloses a release assembly (560,576) including a release button (562,564,576), the release button (562,564,576) including a first end (left knob 562 and shaft 564) extending beyond the first lateral surface and a second end (right knob 562 and shaft 564, Fig. 10A) extending beyond the second lateral surface; and a die pin (566) extending into the die pin cavity (210). Regarding claims 10 and 13, the release button (562,564,576) includes a slot (577,578; Fig. 9C) extending between a first slot end (577) and a second slot end (578) to define a notch which includes first and second sloped surfaces (walls of 577,578) and the die pin (566) slides along the notch walls through the notch. Regarding claim 11, the die pin (566) extends through the slot (577,578; col. 6, lines 23-27). Regarding claim 12, the walls of the slot (577,578) are symmetrical. Regarding claim 14, the notch (577,578) is a stepped profile including longitudinal slot (577) and circumferential slot (578). Regarding claim 15, the die pin (566) is a die engaging portion which extends in the die cavity to retain the die by fixing endplates (580,582). Regarding claim 16, the release button (562,564,576) is dual actuating since there are knobs (562) on left and right sides of the ram head (200,400; Fig. 10A). Regarding claim 17, a biasing element (570) biases the die pin (566) toward a retention orientation (with lock slot, 578). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Khansa et al. (11,623,265) in view of Sakamoto (WO 2010/106902). Khansa does not specifically show that the spring (570) extends into the pin cavity. Sakamoto teaches (Fig. 6B) that a spring (42) which biases a die pin (41) extends into a die pin cavity (43) in a die (6). It would have been obvious to the skilled artisan prior to the effective filing date of the present invention to extends the spring of Khansa into the die cavity as taught by Sakamoto so as to bias the die pin against the die button within the die pin cavity. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWARD THOMAS TOLAN whose telephone number is (571)272-4525. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chris Templeton can be reached at 571-270-1477. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWARD T TOLAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 15, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746590
METHOD OF BENDING AND BENDING MACHINE FOR THE EXECUTION OF A METHOD OF BENDING
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12714433
EMBOLIC DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12691483
COLD ROLLING MILL ROLLING CONDITION CALCULATION METHOD, COLD ROLLING MILL ROLLING CONDITION CALCULATION DEVICE, COLD ROLLING METHOD, COLD ROLLING MILL, AND STEEL SHEET MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686041
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING ROLL-FORMED PART
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12678852
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A METAL PACKAGING IN THE FORM OF A BOTTLE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+16.0%)
2y 9m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1363 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month