Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/665,623

TOOL DEVICE AND STEERABLE-WHEEL ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 16, 2024
Priority
May 18, 2023 — provisional 63/467,468
Examiner
WILHELM, TIMOTHY
Art Unit
3617
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Techtronic Power Tools Technology Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
884 granted / 1124 resolved
+26.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1153
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
79.5%
+39.5% vs TC avg
§102
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1124 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: claim 1 includes the typo “a primary driven gear in mechanical communication with the primary driven gear”. It should read, “a primary driven gear in mechanical communication with the primary drive gear”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 12 is objected to because of the following informalities: claim 12 includes the typo “a primary driven gear in mechanical communication with the primary driven gear”. It should read, “a primary driven gear in mechanical communication with the primary drive gear”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6 is objected to because of the following informalities: claim 16 includes the typo “wherein the reduction gear set mechanically couples the primary driven gear to the primary driven gear”. It should read, “wherein the reduction gear set mechanically couples the primary drive gear to the primary driven gear”. Claim 17 is objected to because of the following informalities: claim 16 includes the typo “wherein the reduction gear set mechanically couples the primary driven gear to the primary driven gear”. It should read, “wherein the reduction gear set mechanically couples the primary drive gear to the primary driven gear”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ishii et al (US 8,267,205). Ishii discloses: With regard to claim 1 - A tool device comprising: a frame 12 comprising a support arm 16; a walking element 14, 15 coupled to the frame 12; a drive motor 34, 36 selectively powering the walking element 14, 15; and a steerable-wheel assembly (SWA) attached to the frame apart from the walking element, the SWA comprising: a caster connector 78 pivotably mounted to the frame 12 at the support arm 16 to rotate about a pivot axis, a steerable wheel 18 rotatably coupled to the caster connector 78, an assembly motor 46 mechanically coupled to the caster connector 78 to pivot the caster connector 78 about the pivot axis, a primary drive gear disposed above a lower end of the support arm, the primary drive gear being in mechanical communication with the assembly motor 46 to be rotated thereby (see marked up figure below), a primary driven gear in mechanical communication with the primary drive gear, and a secondary driven gear disposed on the caster connector 78 in mechanical communication with the primary driven gear to direct rotation of the steerable wheel (see marked up figure below). PNG media_image1.png 768 668 media_image1.png Greyscale With regard to claim 2 - further comprising a secondary drive gear mechanically coupled to the primary driven gear apart from the primary drive gear (see the figure above). With regard to claim 3 - wherein the secondary drive gear is mounted coaxially with the primary driven gear (see marked up figure above). With regard to claim 9 - wherein the secondary drive gear defines a reference diameter (SERD), wherein the secondary driven gear defines a reference diameter (SNRD), and wherein the SERD is less than the SNRD (see marked up figure above). With regard to claim 10 - wherein the primary drive gear defines a reference diameter (PERD), wherein the primary driven gear defines a reference diameter (PNRD), and wherein the PERD is less than the PNRD (see marked up figure above). With regard to claim 11 - wherein the assembly motor 46 is radially offset from the caster connector 78 relative to the pivot axis (see Fig. 8). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ishii in view of Mauritz et al (US 12,552,446). Ishii fails to explicitly disclose a reduction gear set in mechanical communication between the primary drive gear and the secondary driven gear. Mauritz teaches a tool device including a steerable wheel assembly 27 comprising an assembly motor 1 for steering a caster via a caster connector 20, and a reduction gear set 16 in mechanical communication between a primary drive gear 5 and a secondary driven gear 19. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify the tool device of Ishii with the teaching of Mauritz so as to include a reduction gear set in mechanical communication between the primary drive gear and the secondary driven gear to transfer the motor’s high-speed, low-torque output into a slower, higher-torque rotation that the caster wheel can handle effectively. With regard to claim 5, Mauritz teaches a secondary drive gear 18 mechanically coupled to a primary driven gear 13 through the reduction gear set 16 and mechanically coupled with the secondary driven gear 19. With regard to claim 6, Mauritz teaches wherein the reduction gear set 6 mechanically couples the primary driven gear 5 to the primary driven gear (“In FIG. 1, a force flow in the steering drive runs from the electric motor 1 via the motor shaft 2, and the toothing 5 of the motor shaft 2, to the intermediate gear 6. A first speed reduction of the rotational speed occurs here.” – column 6, lines 35-38). Claim(s) 7 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ishii in view of Goebel et al (US 8,855,861). Ishii discloses a sensor 88 capable of detecting the steering angle of the caster connector 78. However, Ishii fails to explicitly disclose wherein the SWA further comprises a detectable magnet fixed to the caster connector to pivot therewith about the pivot axis. Goebel teaches a tool device similar to that of Ishii including a sensor for detecting the rotation angle of a caster connector 92, wherein the sensor comprising a detectable magnet 102 fixed to the caster connector 92 to pivot therewith about the pivot axis. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify the tool device of Ishii with the teaching of Goebel such that the sensor includes a detectable magnet fixed directly to the caster connector to preclude the need for extra gearing and extra space. With regard to claim 8, Goebel teaches an encoder comprising a magnetic sensor 100 fixed to a frame apart from the caster connector 92 to detect a pivotable position of the detectable magnet 102. Claim(s) 12-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ishii in view of Mauritz and Goebel. With regard to claim 12 , Ishii discloses a tool device comprising: a frame 12 comprising a support arm 74; a walking element 14, 15 coupled to the frame 12; a drive motor selectively powering the walking element; and a steerable-wheel assembly (SWA) attached to the frame apart from the walking element, the SWA comprising a caster connector 78 pivotably mounted to the frame at the support arm to rotate about a pivot axis, a steerable wheel 18 rotatably coupled to the caster connector 78, an assembly motor 46 mechanically coupled to the caster connector 78 to pivot the caster connector 78 about the pivot axis, the assembly motor 46 being radially offset from the caster connector 78 relative to the pivot axis, a primary drive gear disposed at an upper end of the support arm 74 opposite a lower end of the support arm 74, the primary drive gear being in mechanical communication with the assembly motor 46 to be rotated thereby, a primary driven gear in mechanical communication with the primary driven gear, a secondary driven gear disposed on the caster connector 78 in mechanical communication with the primary driven gear to direct rotation of the steerable wheel. Ishii fails to explicitly disclose a reduction gear set in mechanical communication between the primary drive gear and the secondary driven gear. As seen above, Mauritz teaches a tool device including a steerable wheel assembly 27 comprising an assembly motor 1 for steering a caster via a caster connector 20, and a reduction gear set 16 in mechanical communication between a primary drive gear 5 and a secondary driven gear 19. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify the tool device of Ishii with the teaching of Mauritz so as to include a reduction gear set in mechanical communication between the primary drive gear and the secondary driven gear to transfer the motor’s high-speed, low-torque output into a slower, higher-torque rotation that the caster wheel can handle effectively. Ishii further fails to explicitly disclose a detectable magnet fixed to the caster connector above the secondary driven gear to pivot with the caster connector about the pivot axis. Goebel teaches a tool device similar to that of Ishii including a sensor for detecting the rotation angle of a caster connector 92, wherein the sensor comprising a detectable magnet 102 fixed to the caster connector 92 to pivot therewith about the pivot axis. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify the tool device of Ishii with the teaching of Goebel such that the sensor includes a detectable magnet fixed directly to the caster connector to preclude the need for extra gearing and extra space. With regard to claim 13, Ishii discloses further comprising a secondary drive gear in mechanical communication with the primary driven gear apart from the primary drive gear (see marked up figure reproduced below). PNG media_image1.png 768 668 media_image1.png Greyscale With regard to claim 14, Ishii discloses wherein the secondary drive gear is disposed at a lower end of the support arm 74. With regard to claim 15, Mauritz teaches wherein the secondary drive gear is mechanically coupled to the primary driven gear through the reduction gear set and mechanically coupled with the secondary driven gear. With regard to claim 16, Ishii discloses wherein the secondary drive gear is mounted coaxially with the primary driven gear (see marked up figure above). With regard to claim 17, Mauritz teaches wherein the reduction gear set mechanically couples the primary drive gear to the primary driven gear. With regard to claim 18, Goebel teaches wherein the SWA further comprises an encoder comprising a magnetic sensor 100 fixed to the frame apart from the caster connector 92 to detect a pivotable position of the detectable magnet 102. With regard to claim 19, Ishii discloses wherein the secondary drive gear defines a reference diameter (SERD), wherein the secondary driven gear defines a reference diameter (SNRD), and wherein the SERD is less than the SNRD. With regard to claim 20, Ishii discloses wherein the primary drive gear defines a reference diameter (PERD), wherein the primary driven gear defines a reference diameter (PNRD), and wherein the PERD is less than the PNRD. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Ishii et al (US 8,544,570) and Strong (US 6,668,965) disclose similar tool devices to that of the present invention comprising comparable SWA’s. Brown et al (US 10,392,007) discloses a tool device including a reduction gear set disposed between a steering motor and a caster connector. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIMOTHY WILHELM whose telephone number is (571)272-6980. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Paul Dickson can be reached at 571-272-7742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIMOTHY WILHELM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3617 June 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679486
ROBOT
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679493
BICYCLE FRAME WITH VIBRATION ISOLATION
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679444
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AN ELECTRIC STEERING SYSTEM
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673550
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING DIFFERENTIAL WHEEL SPEEDS OF MULTI-INDEPENDENT-WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLES
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674507
GEAR CONTROL SYSTEM FOR VIBRATION ATTENUATION
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+11.8%)
2y 5m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1124 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month