Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/665,743

Reusable and Interchangeable Custom Tip Compound Application Device

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 16, 2024
Priority
May 17, 2023 — provisional 63/467,065
Examiner
CARROLL, JEREMY W
Art Unit
3754
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Planet Growth LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
524 granted / 699 resolved
+5.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
733
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
73.4%
+33.4% vs TC avg
§102
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 699 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-13 in the reply filed on 5/6/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 8-11, 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Summons et al (US 20020020718 A1). Claim 1, Summons discloses a first connector end (50; FIG 9A-9B) having a first set of threads (FIG 9A-9B); a tip (48; [0078]) that is configured to be received by the first connector end (49; FIG 9B); a second connector end (49) having a cavity to receive the tip (48) and tighten the device by connecting a second set of threads with the first set of threads; and a container of compound (39) that is attached to the first connector end. Claim 2, Jackson discloses wherein the first connector end (50) comprises a base of the device. Claim 3, Jackson discloses wherein the second connector end (49) comprises a top of the device. Claim 4, Jackson discloses wherein the tip (48) comprises a middle layer (FIG 9B) held flush between the first connector end and the second connector end when the second connector end is tightened into the first connector end (FIG 9B). Claim 5, Jackson discloses wherein the tip (48) comprises a top layer molded to the second connector end (49) which becomes the middle layer when the second connector end is tightened into the first connector end. Clam 6, Jackson discloses a base (50); a customizable tip (48; [0078]) that sits flush with the base; and a tightener (49) having a cavity to receive the customizable tip and having a first set of threads that connects with a second set of threads on the base and holds the customizable tip in place. Claim 8, Jackson discloses wherein the first set of threads sit outside of the second set of threads (FIG 9B). Claim 9, Jackson discloses a container of compound (39) attached to the base. Claims 10-11, Jackson discloses wherein the base, the customizable tip, and the tightener are plastic ([0078], [0108]) or metal ([0108]). Claim 13, Jackson discloses wherein the customizable tip (48; [0078]) is configured to create a bead of compound having a particular size and shape. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jackson as applied to claim 5 above. Claim 12, Jackson discloses the claimed invention except for plant base material. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to product it out of a plant based mater in order to reduce carbon footprint and assist in recycling, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious engineering choice. The selection of a known material based on its suitability for its intended use supported a prima facie obviousness determination (MPEP 2144.07). Claim(s) 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jackson as applied to claim 5 above, and further in view of Chick (US 20070095865 A1). Claim 7, Jackson substantially discloses the apparatus as claimed above but is silent on wherein the first set of threads sit inside of the second set of threads. Chick teaches wherein the first set of threads sit inside of the second set of threads (8). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Jackson with threads as taught by Chick in order to provide simple substitution of one known element for another to achieve the predictable result of a connector. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEREMY W CARROLL whose telephone number is (571)272-4988. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Paul Durand can be reached at (571) 272-4459. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JEREMY W. CARROLL Primary Examiner Art Unit 3754 /Jeremy Carroll/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3754
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678813
OPENING/CLOSING AND VAPORIZING MECHANISM FOR A BOTTLE, FOR EXAMPLE OF PERFUME, AND SUCH A BOTTLE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12685072
WORKING STATION SYSTEMS FOR DISPENSING A FLUID IN CONNECTION WITH ELECTRONICS ASSEMBLY
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673860
APPARATUS FOR PIERCING A SEAL OF A LIQUID-FILLED CONTAINER
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667179
DISPENSING ASSEMBLY AND CONTAINER SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662282
Cartridge System
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 699 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month