Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/665,998

METHODS OF FORMING ANTI-GLARE SURFACE STRUCTURE WITH CO-LOCATED REFRACTIVE INDEX CONTRAST IN GLASS SUBSTRATES USING GAS LASERS AND ANTI-GLARE LIGHT-TRANSMITTING STRUCTURES WITH LOW SPARKLE AND LOW DISTINCTINESS-OF-IMAGE FORMED FROM SUCH METHODS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 16, 2024
Priority
May 22, 2023 — provisional 63/468,048
Examiner
SIMONE, CATHERINE A
Art Unit
1781
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Corning Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
695 granted / 949 resolved
+8.2% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
996
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
65.1%
+25.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 949 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-12, in the reply filed on 4/8/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 13-21 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 4/8/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 4 recites the limitation "the peaks" in lines 1-2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 7 recites the limitation "the valleys" in lines 1-2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 5-6 and 8-9 are also rejected as being dependent on claim 4 and including the indefinite aspects thereof. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gollier et al. (US 2015/0167921) [hereinafter Gollier]. Regarding claim 1, Gollier discloses a light transmitting structure (Figs. 8A-8B and 19C-19F), comprising a glass-based substrate (substrate 12; paragraphs [0066] and [0043]) having a first major surface and a second major surface opposite the first major surface, the glass-based substrate comprising a first composition that is transparent and has a first refractive index n1 (paragraphs [0043], [0074] and [0077]), and a plurality of surface regions (particles, droplets 332 or regions 350; paragraphs [0073] and [0092-0093]) fused with the glass-based substrate to define a light- scattering surface interposed with the first major surface, each surface region comprising a second composition that is transparent and has a second refractive index n₂ that is different than the first refractive index n₁ (paragraphs [0077], [0092-0093] and [0098]), the first major surface and the light-scattering surface defining an interface to an ambient environment [paragraph [0097]). Regarding claim 2, Gollier discloses n₂- n₁ ≥ 0.05 (paragraph [0077]). Regarding claim 3, Gollier discloses wherein the interface comprises a plurality of peaks and valleys, and wherein an average roughness of the interface comprises a peak-to-valley distance in a range from about 0.1 µm to about 300 µm (paragraph [0056], [0092] and [0098]). Regarding claim 4, Gollier discloses the surface regions define the peaks when n₂ < n1 (paragraphs [0050], [0056], [0077] and [0092-0094]). Regarding claim 5, Gollier discloses the first refractive index n₁ is in a range from about 1.40 to about 2.10 (paragraph [0077]). Regarding claim 6, Gollier discloses wherein the second refractive index n2 is in a range from about 1.30 to about 2.00 (paragraph [0077]). Regarding claim 7, Gollier discloses wherein the surface regions define the valleys when n₂ > n₁ (paragraphs [0077] and [0092-0094]). Regarding claim 8, Gollier discloses the first refractive index n1 is in a range from about 1.4 to about 1.9 (paragraphs [0077] and [0098]). Regarding claim 9, Gollier discloses the second refractive index n2 is in a range from about 1.5 to about 2.1 (paragraphs [0077] and [0098]). Regarding claim 10, Gollier discloses the second composition is a glass (paragraphs [0028-0029] and [0091]). Regarding claim 11, Gollier discloses the second composition is a metal, a metal oxide or a combination thereof (paragraph [0077]). Regarding claim 12, Gollier discloses the second composition is a polymer (paragraphs [0073] and [0092-0096]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CATHERINE A SIMONE whose telephone number is (571)272-1501. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frank Vineis can be reached at 571-270-1547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Catherine A. Simone/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1781 CATHERINE A. SIMONE Examiner Art Unit 1781
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12668721
FRICTION FILM
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661861
REINFORCEMENT PILLAR ASSEMBLIES AND A METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SUCH ASSEMBLIES
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654200
COATING FILM, AUTOMOBILE, AND COATING METHOD
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12654355
COEXTRUDED HEMP COMPOSITE BOARD
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12616062
DEVICE ASSEMBLY, DEVICE MODULE INCLUDING THE DEVICE ASSEMBLY, AND DEVICE PACKAGE INCLUDING THE DEVICE MODULE
3y 8m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+23.1%)
2y 11m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 949 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month