Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/667,157

VEHICLE THEFT DETERRENT DEVICES AND METHODS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 17, 2024
Examiner
BARRETT, SUZANNE LALE DINO
Art Unit
3675
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
940 granted / 1220 resolved
+25.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1238
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
§102
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1220 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-8, 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gleason in view of DE262. Re Claim 1. (Currently Amended) A theft deterrent box (10; Figs. 1-4) comprising: a housing (10) having at least a first portion (11) and a second portion (12), wherein the theft deterrent box has an open state (Fig. 3) when at least a portion of a gear shifter (G/S) of a vehicle is receivable in the housing and wherein the housing has a closed state (Fig. 4) when at least a portion of the gear shifter is received in the housing and the housing is not removable from the gear shifter; a lock (21,22,23) integrated into one of the first portion or the second portion, the lock configured to maintain the housing in a closed state and release the housing to the open state; and a cord (DE262; d) having a first end and a second end (Fig. 1), wherein the first end is configured to couple to a steering wheel (g) of the vehicle and wherein the second end is configured to couple to the housing (gear shift housing b,c). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the theft deterrent box of Gleason with a cord therebetween the steering wheel as taught by DE262 and as is old and well known in the lock art to enhance the security of a vehicle against theft. Re Claim 2. (Original) Gleason as modified by DE262 discloses the theft deterrent box of claim 1, wherein the housing (Gleason 10) is configured to receive a handle (G) of the gear shifter (Figs. 1,3,4). Re Claim 3. (Original) Gleason as modified by DE262 discloses the theft deterrent box of claim 1, further comprising at least one hole (Gleason 24/25; Fig.4) configured to receive a shaft (S) of the gear shifter. Re Claim 4. (Original) Gleason as modified by DE262 discloses the theft deterrent box of claim 3, further comprising a block (Gleason – liners 26/27; Fig.4) removable from the first portion (11) and the second portion (12), wherein the hole (24/25) passes through the block. Re Claim 5. (Original) Gleason as modified by DE262 discloses the theft deterrent box of claim 1, wherein when the housing (Gleason 10) is in the open state (Fig. 3), at least a portion of the first portion (11) of the housing is separate from at least a portion of the second portion (12) of the housing. Re Claim 6. (Original) Gleason as modified by DE262 discloses the theft deterrent box of claim 1, wherein when the housing (Gleason 10) is in the closed state (Figs. 1,4), the first portion (11) and the second portion (12) form a cavity (Fig.4), wherein at least a portion of the gear shifter (G/R/S) is receivable in the cavity. Re Claim 7. (Original) Gleason as modified by DE262 discloses the theft deterrent box of claim 1, further comprising a lock (Gleason-21/22/23) wherein the lock is configured to lock the first portion (11) and the second portion (12) in the closed state (Fig.4). Re Claim 8. (Original) Gleason as modified by DE262 discloses the theft deterrent box of claim 1, wherein the first portion (Gleason 11) and the second portion (12) are joined by a hinge (13; Figs. 1,3,4). Re Claim 10. (Original) Gleason as modified by DE262 discloses the theft deterrent box of claim 1, further comprising a hole (Gleason 24/25) configured to receive a shaft (S) of the gear shifter, wherein the gear shifter has a handle (G/R), and wherein the hole has a diameter smaller than a diameter of the handle. Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gleason as modified by DE262 as applied to claims 1-8, 10 above, and further in view of Yair. Re Claim 11. (Original) Gleason as modified by DE262 discloses the theft deterrent box of claim 1, but fails to teach further comprising a biometric reader configured to read biometric data of a user, and wherein the housing is configured to transition to the open state in response to reading the biometric data. Yair discloses a vehicle gear selector lock comprising a biometric locking mechanism or a simple key (para [0006]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the simple key lock of Gleason with a biometric lock as taught by Yair as a well known alternative locking device. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12-15, 17-20 are allowed. Claim 9 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-8, 10, 11 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. As set forth above, in response to applicant’s amendments, the previously applied Gleason and DE262 references are now combined under 35 USC 103 to teach the lock and attached cord as claimed. Applicant’s arguments and amendments are persuasive with respect to allowed claims 12-5,17-20. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUZANNE DINO BARRETT whose telephone number is (571)272-7053. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 8AM-6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine Mills can be reached at 571-272-8322. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SUZANNE DINO BARRETT Primary Examiner Art Unit 3675B Sdb /SUZANNE L BARRETT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3675
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 17, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 30, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595688
SECURE, REMOTELY CONTROLLED, INTERNALLY POWERED PADLOCK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584512
UNIVERSAL FASTENING LOCK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12559973
PLUG FOR LOCK SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED METHOD OF ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12553258
LATCH ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF INSTALLING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12546565
Restroom Stall Firearm Receptacle
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+8.2%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1220 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month