Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/668,009

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING AND AUTOMATING AN ENCLOSED VOLUME WITH A FLEXIBLE FUEL TANK AND PROPELLANT METERING FOR MACHINE OPERATIONS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 17, 2024
Examiner
THOMAS, KAREEN KAY
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Orbit Fab Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
1015 granted / 1323 resolved
+6.7% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1353
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§102
37.4%
-2.6% vs TC avg
§112
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1323 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of group I in the reply filed on 10/07/2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 47-49 and 51-53 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Holemans et al (US2014/0319283). 47. A flexible container system (Figs 1-13B) for space operations, the flexible container system comprising: a flexible container (300) configured to be carried by a host spacecraft; an expulsion device (Figs. 3 and 4) configured to expel material from the flexible container, and a computer system (par. 0089) programmed with instructions that, when executed: deploy the flexible container from a stowed configuration (assembled and ready to use) to a deployed configuration (in use), wherein in the deployed configuration, the flexible container remains attached to the host spacecraft and extends away from the host spacecraft; and operate an expulsion device to expel material from the flexible container (paragraphs 0006, 0079 and 0082). 48. The flexible container system of claim 47 wherein the computer system is further programmed with instructions that, when executed, cause the material to be transferred to a second spacecraft docked with the host spacecraft (Figs. 3-4). 49. The flexible container system of claim 47 wherein the flexible container comprises a first flexible bladder and a second flexible bladder positioned within the first flexible bladder (Figs. 3-4). 51. The flexible container system of claim 47 wherein the host spacecraft is a first host spacecraft, and wherein the flexible container system further comprises a coupler for transferring the material between the flexible container and the first host spacecraft or between the flexible container and a second host spacecraft (Figs. 3-4). 52. The flexible container system of claim 47 wherein, in the stowed configuration, the flexible container is entirely contained by a host spacecraft (Figs. 3-4). 53. The flexible container system of claim 47, further comprising one or more doors for restraining the flexible container prior to deployment of the flexible container, and wherein the computer system is further programmed with instructions that, when executed, operate a release mechanism to release the one or more doors to allow the flexible container to extend away from the host spacecraft (Figs. 3-4). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 50 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAREEN KAY THOMAS whose telephone number is (571)270-5611. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Orlando E. Aviles can be reached at 571-270-5531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAREEN K THOMAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 17, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 07, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600561
Fluid Storage Tank Including a Flexible Bladder Supported on a Collapsible Rigid Frame
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600562
Waste Bin Arrangement
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600556
INSULATING CONTAINER FOR TAKEAWAY PIZZA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600530
CAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589915
DISPENSING TAP EQUIPPED WITH FLEXIBLE INTERNAL VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.1%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1323 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month