Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/668,281

IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 20, 2024
Examiner
VALENCIA, ALEJANDRO
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Toshiba TEC Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
42%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
48%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 42% of resolved cases
42%
Career Allow Rate
567 granted / 1335 resolved
-25.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
151 currently pending
Career history
1486
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1335 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Objections Claims 7 and 17 are objected to because of the following informalities: “the front-rear direction” and “the left-right direction” lack antecedent basis. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 7 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The terms “front-rear direction” and “left-right direction” have not been defined and are indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kawasumi et al. (2023/0324848). Regarding claims 1 and 11, Kawasumi teaches an image forming apparatus, comprising: a printer component (see fig. 1); a scanning component (see fig. 1); a copy component (see fig. 1); an exposure device (fig. 31, item 24); a housing (fig. 1, item 100) including a support member (fig. 31, item 31) that supports the exposure device (see fig. 14); and a cooling device (fig. 34, item 40/62/63), configured to facilitate a refrigerant flow in a first direction (fig. 18, L/R) in a space between the exposure device and the support member (see figs. 34-38), wherein the exposure device includes a first foot portion (fig. 31, portion of exposure device contacting item 33) and a second foot portion (fig. 31, portion of exposure device contacting item 32) aligned in the first direction and each protruding downward (see fig. 31), the support member includes, on a surface thereof facing a lower surface of the exposure device, a first projection portion (fig. 31, item 33) extending in a second direction (fig. 31, U direction) intersecting the first direction and aligned with the first foot portion in the second direction (see fig. 31), and a second projection portion (fig. 31, item 32) extending in the second direction, aligned with the second foot portion in the second direction (see fig. 31), and including a plurality of portions spaced apart from each other in the second direction (see fig. 31, note that any component can be said to have “a plurality of portions spaced apart from each other in the second direction”, and the first foot portion and the second foot portion are separated from the support member (see fig. 31). Regarding claims 2 and 12, Kawasumi teaches the image forming apparatus according to claims 1 and 11, respectively, wherein the support member further includes, on the surface facing lower surface of the exposure device, a recess portion (fig. 31, portion between projecting portions 32, 33) extending in the first direction so as to intersect the second projection portion (see fig. 31). Regarding claims 3 and 13, Kawasumi teaches the image forming apparatus according to claims 2 and 12, respectively, further comprising a seal member (figs. 29, 30, item 207) provided on a side surface of the recess portion (see figs. 29, 30). Regarding claim 4 and 14, Kawasumi teaches the image forming apparatus according to claims 3 and 13, respectively, wherein an upper end of the seal member is in contact with a lower surface of the exposure device (see figs. 29, 30). Regarding claims 5 and 15, Kawasumi teaches the image forming apparatus according to claims 1 and 11, respectively, wherein the housing includes, on a side surface thereof, an insertion opening (fig. 5, note opening) for inserting and attaching the exposure device, and the support member is a plate-shaped member disposed substantially horizontally adjacent to the insertion opening (compare figs. 5, 31), and the support member configured to act as an insertion guide that guides the insertion of the exposure device by making the second foot portion in sliding-contact with the second projection portion while making the first foot portion in sliding-contact with the first projection portion when the exposure device is inserted into and attached to the housing in the second direction through the insertion opening (see figs. 5, 6, 7, 31 and 32). Regarding claim 6 and 16, Kawasumi teaches the image forming apparatus according to claims 1 and 11, respectively, wherein the cooling device comprises a fan configured to send air below the exposure device through a duct (see figs. 34-38). Regarding claim 7 and 17, Kawasumi teaches the image forming apparatus according to claims 1 and 11, respectively, image forming apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the support member has a flat plate-shaped member formed of a sheet metal extending in the front-rear direction and the left-right direction (see fig. 31, note flat sheet shape of support member 31), and the support member is shorter than the exposure device in the left-right direction and wider than a lower surface of the exposure device (see fig. 31). Regarding claim 8 and 18, Kawasumi teaches the image forming apparatus according to claims 1 and 11, respectively, wherein the support member is disposed substantially horizontally below the exposure device (see fig. 31). Regarding claim 9 and 9, Kawasumi teaches the image forming apparatus according to claims 1 and 11, respectively, wherein the support member comprises a rail in sliding-contact with a lower surface of an insertion foot portion protruding from the lower surface of the exposure device when the exposure device is inserted into and attached to the housing (see fig. 31). Regarding claim 10 and 20, Kawasumi teaches the image forming apparatus according to claims 1 and 11, respectively, wherein the support member partially forms a space through which air for cooling a polygon motor ([0126]) in the exposure device flows between the support member and a lower surface of the exposure device (see fig. 38). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEJANDRO VALENCIA whose telephone number is (571)270-5473. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DOUGLAS X. RODRIGUEZ can be reached at 571-431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEJANDRO VALENCIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600127
INKJET ASSEMBLY, INKJET PRINTING APPARATUS AND INKJET PRINTING METHOD FOR USE IN PREPARATION OF DISPLAY COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583238
PAPER SUPPLY CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576644
RECORDING DEVICE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING RECORDING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570101
RECORDING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12558904
DROP-ON-DEMAND INK DELIVERY SYSTEMS AND METHODS WITH TANKLESS RECIRCULATION FOR CARD PROCESSING SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
42%
Grant Probability
48%
With Interview (+5.9%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1335 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month