Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/668,952

POWER AMPLIFIER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 20, 2024
Priority
Nov 20, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0161486
Examiner
LIENG, MALANE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
37 granted / 40 resolved
+32.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
51
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
44.1%
+4.1% vs TC avg
§102
39.5%
-0.5% vs TC avg
§112
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 40 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 8 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 8, lines 3 and 5, in each line “the power transistor” should read as -- the first power transistor--, respectively. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 10; 15, 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by SATO (US 20180342992 A1), hereafter referred to as "SATO". Regarding claims 1 and 10, in the embodiment of Figs. 1-4, SATO discloses: A power amplifier (Figs. 1-4, power amplifier circuit 100) comprising: a first power transistor (transistor Q1) configured to amplify a first input Radio Frequency (RF) signal (RFIN), and output a first output RF signal (RFOUT1); a first bias circuit (bias circuits 110) configured to operate in a first communication mode the first communication mode is a 2G communication mode (paragraph [0016] lines 7-10, power amplifier circuit 100 amplifies power of a signal of a communication standard such as, for example, a second-generation mobile communication system (2G) per claim 10), and comprising a first transistor (Fig. 2, transistor Qc) configured to supply a first bias current (bias current Ibias1) to the first power transistor (via base of the transistor Q1, as shown in Figs. 2-4); and a second bias circuit (bias circuit 120) configured to operate in a second communication mode wherein the second communication mode is a 4G communication mode or a 5G communication mode (paragraph [0016] lines 7-13, The power amplifier circuit 100 amplifies power of a signal of a communication standard such as, for example, a fourth-generation mobile communication system (4G), a fifth-generation mobile communication system (5G) per claim 10), and comprising a second transistor (transistor Qd) configured to supply a second bias current (bias current Ibias2) to the first power transistor (via base of the transistor Q1, as shown in Figs. 2-4). Regarding claims 15 and 20, in the embodiment of Fig. 5, SATO discloses: A power amplifier (Fig. 5, power amplifier circuit 100C, note: bias circuit 120 is only shown in the first stage, but the configuration in the first stage for transistor Q1is not limited to that the first stage and may be used in the second stage for transistor Q2 per paragraph [0057]) comprising: a first power transistor (transistor Q1) configured to amplify a first input Radio Frequency (RF) signal (input signal RFin), and output a first output RF signal (amplification signal RFout1); a first transistor (transistor Qc of bias circuit 110A) configured to operate in a first communication mode and a second communication mode (paragraph [0016] lines 7-13, The power amplifier circuit 100 amplifies power of a signal of a communication standard such as, for example, a second-generation mobile communication system (2G), a fourth-generation mobile communication system (4G), a fifth-generation mobile communication system (5G)), and comprising a first terminal wherein the first terminal of the first transistor is an emitter of the first transistor (Qc emitter, per claim 20) configured to supply a first bias current (Ibias1) to the first power transistor (via base of Q1, as shown in Fig. 5); a second power transistor (transistor Q2) configured to amplify a second input RF signal (RFout1 as an input to Q2 base via element C4) corresponding to the first output RF signal, and output a second output RF signal (amplification signal RFout2); a second transistor (Fig. 5, transistor Qc of bias circuit 130A, note: Bias Circuit 120-120B of Figs. 1-3 will be used as an example of how the configuration of power amplifier circuit 100-100B of Figs. 1-3 may be used per paragraph [0057]) configured to operate in the first communication mode (paragraph [0016] lines 7-10, power amplifier circuit 100 amplifies power of a signal of a communication standard such as, for example, a second-generation mobile communication system (2G)) and comprising a first terminal wherein the first terminal of the second transistor is an emitter of the second transistor (Fig. 5, Qc emitter (analogously Qc of 110A of fig. 2), per claim 20) configured to supply a second bias current (Fig. 5, bias current Ibias3) to the second power transistor (via base of Q2, as shown in Fig. 5); and a third transistor (Figs. 1-3, transistor Qd of bias circuit 120-12B) configured to operate in the second communication mode (paragraph [0040] lines 1-10, in the bias circuit 120B, the resistance of the variable resistor Radj may be changed according to at least one of the communication standard (e.g. 2G, 3G, 4G, etc.)) and comprising a first terminal wherein the first terminal of the third transistor is an emitter of the third transistor (Qc emitter, per claim 20) configured to supply a third bias current (Fig. 1-3, Ibias2) to the second power transistor (Figs. 1-3, shown to be connected to base of Q1 as analogous to Q2 in Fig. 5). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-9, 11-14, and 16-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over SATO (US 20180342992 A1) in view of NI (cited by the applicant), hereafter referred to as “SATO” and “NI”, respectively. Regarding claims 2-9, 11-14, 16-19 in the embodiment of Figs. 1-5, SATO discloses: a first and second input RF signal wherein each RF signal is input in a terminal (Fig. 5, RFin, and output of transistor Q1 input to element C4), and a first, second, and third bias circuit (Fig. 5, bias circuits 110A, 120B, and 130A) comprising a first, second, and third transistor (Fig. 5, transistor Qc, and transistors Qd of bias circuits 110A, 120B, and 130A) wherein first, second, and third transistor each comprises a first terminal wherein each first terminal of each transistor is an emitter of the first, second, and third transistors (Fig. 5, emitters of transistor Qc and transistors Qd of 110A, 120B, and 130A), and wherein the first and second transistors are configured to supply the first and second bias current to the first power transistor (Figs. 2 and 5, Qc and Qd are shown to supply transistor Q1 with Ibias1 and Ibias2) and the third bias circuit is configured to supply the third bias current to the second power transistor (Fig. 5, Qc of 130A supplies Ibias3 to transistor Q2), wherein the first input RF signal corresponds to the second output RF signal (Fig. 5, RFout1 terminal input to element C4, corresponds to RFout2, note: bias circuit 120 is only shown in the first stage, but the configuration in the first stage for transistor Q1is not limited to that the first stage and may be used in the second stage for transistor Q2 per paragraph [0057], and therefore, the configuration of the first and second stage can be switched), and a first and second communication mode (paragraph [0016] lines 7-13, The power amplifier circuit 100 amplifies power of a signal of a communication standard such as, for example, a second-generation mobile communication system (2G), a fourth-generation mobile communication system (4G), a fifth-generation mobile communication system (5G)). However, Sato is silent in teaching a first, second, and third linearization circuit comprising a first and a second capacitor, and a capacitor of the third linearization circuit (“third” capacitor per claim 17), respectively, comprising a first and second terminal connected in series with a first and a second resistor, and a resistor of the third linearization circuit (“third” resistor per claim 17), respectively, connected to the second terminals of each capacitor, respectively, and each linearization circuit is connected between the terminal to which the first and second input RF signal is input and the first terminal of the first, second, and third transistor, respectively, wherein each linearization circuit is configured to couple a portion of the first and second input RF signal to an output of the first terminal of the first, second, and third transistor, respectively. NI teaches: a linearization circuit (Fig. 3 and 6B, linearizing circuit 104) comprising a capacitor comprising a first and second terminal and a resistor connected in series between the terminal of the RF signal input, the second terminal of the capacitor and the first terminal of the transistor (Fig. 6B, linearizing circuit 104 shows resistor R6 and capacitor C6 is connected in series between input (IN) and emitter of transistor Qb between nodes 110 and 114 along path 112), wherein each linearization circuit is configured to couple a portion of the input RF signal and the first terminal of the transistor (per paragraph [0052], linearizing circuit 104 along the path 112 couples the nodes 110 and 114). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention for emitter of the transistors of each bias circuit taught by SATO (Fig. 5 and similarly taught in NI Fig. 2) to further include a linearization circuit taught by NI (Fig. 3 and 6B) to yield rectification on the base-emitter junction to thereby correct AM-AM distortion (NI, paragraph [0048] lines 5-11), thereby suggesting the obviousness of such a combination. It would be further obvious to one having ordinary skill in art for the resistors to be connected to one shared capacitor in the linearization circuit as it is known in the art to compensate for two capacitors in parallel add capacitance directly, as known in the art, thereby suggesting the obviousness of such a modification. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MALANE LIENG whose telephone number is (571)272-5739. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6:30 - 4:00 CST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Baltzell can be reached at (571) 272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Malane Lieng/Examiner, Art Unit 2843 /ANDREA LINDGREN BALTZELL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 20, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750024
METHODS AND APPARATUS TO DETERMINE A BIAS CURRENT OF AN AMPLIFIER
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750020
POWER AMPLIFIER SYSTEMS WITH SWITCHABLE TRANSISTOR ARRAY AND SWITCHABLE BIASING CIRCUIT
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750021
RADIO FREQUENCY LOW NOISE AMPLIFIERS
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744499
RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICE APPLIED IN PHASED ARRAY ANTTENNA WITH POWER DETECTION AND CALIBRATION, SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD THEREOF
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738908
POWER AMPLIFIER AND CONTROL METHOD
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.4%)
3y 1m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 40 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month