Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/669,154

FIREPLACE RETRACTABLE HOOK

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 20, 2024
Priority
Apr 22, 2024 — CN 202420843291X
Examiner
SAVANI, AVINASH A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Dongguan Jiaming Metal Products Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
987 granted / 1324 resolved
+14.5% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1345
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
91.5%
+51.5% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1324 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. CN202420843291X, filed on 4/22/2024. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chang [5301912]. With respect to claim 1, Chang discloses: A fireplace retractable hook, comprising a mounting base (31) and a hook body (32) installed inside the mounting base, wherein the hook body comprises a installation part (42) extended in horizontal and a hook part (14) extended downwards and set at an outer side of the installation part [see FIGs 3-4]; a bottom surface of the mounting base is provided with a guide slot (21) extended along front-to-rear, the guide slot runs through at least one side of the mounting base, the installation part is arranged inside the guide slot, the hook part extends outside the guide slot, and the installation part is capable to move inside and outside the guide slot (via positioning groove 26) [see FIGs 7-9, col 2, line 55-col 3, line 2]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chang [5301912], further in view of Yang [9091414]. With respect to claim 2, Chang discloses the invention as substantially claimed, however does not show the use of a weighted block. Yang makes up for these deficiencies by teaching: {cl. 2} The fireplace retractable hook as claimed in claim 1, wherein the mounting base (15) comprises a shell (16) and a counterweight block (17), and the counterweight block is arranged on an inner side of a bottom of the shell [see FIGs 2 and 4, col 2, line 65-col 3, line 5]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the apparatus of Chang with the teachings of Yang because provides a weighted block in the shell base in order to provide balance when the hook is in use. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chang [5301912], further in view of Blomgren [1770062]. With respect to claim 10, Chang discloses the invention as substantially claimed, however does not show the soft cushion layer as claimed. Blomgren makes up for these deficiencies by teaching: {cl. 10} The fireplace retractable hook as claimed in claim 1, wherein a soft cushion layer (2) is provided on the bottom surface of the mounting base (1) [see FIG 1, page 1, right column, lines 64-70]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the apparatus of Chang with the teachings of Blomgren because Blomgren provides a pad of felt to protect the surface of which the base resides. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The claims show a feature not found in the art and would require impermissible hindsight reasoning to combine. For example, Chang provides a dovetail-shaped guide block 33, however this is not a weighted block as required. Since Yang is provided to teach the weighted block, modification would need to be made to a teaching reference. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AVINASH A SAVANI whose telephone number is (571)270-3762. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Hoang can be reached at 571-272-6460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AVINASH A SAVANI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3762 7/6/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680051
WOODEN WICKS INCLUDING A BOOSTER FOR A CANDLE AND METHOD OF MAKING
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674578
Hydronic Surface Heater with Auto-Adjusting Burner
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667224
PORTABLE GRILLS INCLUDING A BASE HAVING SUPPORTS FOR STORING REMOVABLE SIDE TABLES
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669242
GRILL COOKBOXES INCLUDING DUAL-LIPPED LOWER RIMS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663164
COOKING OVEN
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+20.7%)
3y 0m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1324 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month