Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/670,887

METHOD, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM TO PROVIDE BOT-BASED ROLE-PLAYING SERVICE ON SOCIAL PLATFORM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 22, 2024
Examiner
IANNUZZI, PETER J
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Line Plus Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
343 granted / 509 resolved
-2.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
548
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§103
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 509 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by 2023/0306205 by Maeder. Regarding claim 1, Maeder discloses a bot-based role-playing method performed by a computer device comprising at least one processor configured to execute computer-readable instructions in a memory (para. 12, 90-94 – see processor and hardware and RPG implementation), the bot-based role-playing method comprising: receiving, by the at least one processor, a script for an openchat (para. 134-143 – see the dialogue generation sources); and creating, by the at least one processor, at least one character bot for role-playing in the openchat by learning at least one character included in the script through an artificial intelligence (AI) language model (para. 134-143, 153 – see the chat of the trained AI trained chatbot). Regarding claim 2, Maeder discloses the bot-based role-playing method of claim 1, wherein the creating, by the at least one processor, the at least one character bot for role-playing in the openchat comprises learning the at least one character, based on a line, an interaction, and situation information in the script (para. 134-143 – see character dialogue training source). Regarding claim 3, Maeder discloses the bot-based role-playing method of claim 1, wherein the creating, by the at least one processor, the at least one character bot for role-playing in the openchat comprises learning the at least one character by applying at least one of profile information of the at least one character and era or region information that serves as a background of the script (para. 134-143 – see the character profile generated based on a story and the subsequent chat that would be generated). Regarding claim 4, Maeder discloses the bot-based role-playing method of claim 1, further comprising providing, by the at least one processor, a role-playing game in which a user participating in the openchat takes on a role of the at least one character bot through the openchat (para. 12 – see the user participation in the narrative of the RPG). Regarding claim 5, Maeder discloses the bot-based role-playing method of claim 1, further comprising pushing, by the at least one processor, a role-playing situation linked to external information based on a learned situation of a corresponding character bot through the at least one character bot that participates in a conversation within the openchat (para. 134-143 – see the character taking on the identity of a character in an ongoing narrative RPG). Regarding claim 6, Maeder discloses the bot-based role-playing method of claim 1, further comprising determining, by the at least one processor, role-playing fitness of a user based on the at least one character bot for the user that takes on a role of the at least one character bot (para. 134-143 – see user interest determination). Regarding claim 7, Maeder discloses the bot-based role-playing method of claim 6, wherein the determining, by the at least one processor, the role-playing fitness of the user comprises determining the role-playing fitness of the user based on answer similarity that compares the user’s answer and the at least one character bot’s answer for a given situation (para. 134-143 – see user interest and narrative progression based on the dynamic between the user and bot). Regarding claim 8, Maeder discloses the bot-based role-playing method of claim 6, wherein the determining, by the at least one processor, the role-playing fitness of the user comprises determining the role-playing fitness of the user based on at least one of evaluation results by a role-playing master set to the openchat, a matching status with information applied during learning of the at least one character bot, and results of voting by other users that participate in the openchat, for a conversation message input from the user (para. 134-143, 306-310 – see content created during multiple interactions and ranking/evaluation). Regarding claim 9, Maeder discloses the bot-based role-playing method of claim 1, further comprising creating, by the at least one processor, secondary content of the openchat based on a role-playing conversation included in the openchat (para. 134-143 – see additional content created during multiple interactions). Regarding claim 10, Maeder discloses the bot-based role-playing method of claim 9, wherein the creating, by the at least one processor, the secondary content comprises: selecting a main message from among conversation messages included in the openchat based on the script, and creating the main message as the secondary content (para. 134-143 – see additional content created during multiple interactions). Regarding claims 11-20, these claims are rejected as noted above regarding claims 1-10, mutatis mutandis. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER J IANNUZZI whose telephone number is (571)272-5793. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30AM-5:30PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kang Hu can be reached at 571-270-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER J IANNUZZI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 22, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592126
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ELECTRONIC GAMING INCLUDING GESTURE-BASED PLAYER CONSTRUCTED SYMBOL COMBINATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589304
METHOD AND AR GLASSES FOR AR GLASSES INTERACTIVE DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589311
PERFORMANCE PREDICTION FOR VIRTUALIZED GAMING APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589290
FUNCTION BUTTON MODULE WITH VARIABLE FUNCTION LAYOUT AND GAME CONTROLLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586442
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING SINGLE ACCOUNT AND SINGLE WALLET FOR DISTRIBUTED GAMING SYSTEM ACROSS JURISDICTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+14.6%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 509 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month