Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/670,925

INK JET RECORDING METHOD AND INK JET RECORDING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 22, 2024
Examiner
UHLENHAKE, JASON S
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
1010 granted / 1160 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Minimal -3% lift
Without
With
+-2.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1201
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1160 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 7-8, 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Koganehira et al (U.S. Pub. 2020/0410311) in view of Shirota et al (U.S. Pat. 6,547,382) Regarding claims 1, 11, Koganehira discloses an ink jet recording method using an ink jet recording apparatus comprising: a first ink storage portion (431) that has an openable and closable ink inlet port (42) and that is refillable with an aqueous ink (Paragraph 0087) from the ink inlet port (Figures 3-6; Paragraph 0029) A second ink storage portion (liquid will be stored within the recording head via tube 18, for ejection) that is connected to the first ink storage portion via a tube (18) and that stores the aqueous ink (Figure 6; Paragraphs 0025, 0032, 0044) A recording head (17) that is connected to the second ink storage portion and that has an ejection orifice formed to eject the aqueous ink supplied from the second ink storage portion (Figure 6; Paragraph 0025) Recording an image by applying the aqueous ink ejected from the ejection orifice to a recording medium (Paragraph 0025). Koganehira fails to disclose wherein the aqueous ink comprises a black ink containing a carbon black and an acrylic resin particle, and a color ink containing an organic pigment, and a content P1 (% by mass) of the carbon black in the black ink and a content P2 (% by mass) of the organic pigment in the color ink satisfy a relationship of the following expression (1): P1 ≤ P2…. (1). Shirota discloses wherein the aqueous ink comprises a black ink containing a carbon black and an acrylic resin particle (Table 1; Column 11, Lines 5-25), and a color ink containing an organic pigment A content P1 (% by mass) of the carbon black in the black ink (content of the carbon black in the ink is 5% by mass; Column 11, Line 65 – Column 12, Line 5) and a content P2 (% by mass) of the organic pigment in the color ink (concentration of the organic pigment in the ink is up to 20% by mass; Column 5, Lines 49-56) satisfy a relationship of the following expression (1): P1 ≤ P2…. (1) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Shirota into the device of Koganehira, for the purpose of forming an image with stably satisfying requirements for characteristics such as feathering, bleeding, a fixing property and color tone (Column 1, Lines 48-54) Regarding claim 2, Shirota discloses wherein, in the black ink, a content R1 (% by mass) of the acrylic resin particle is 0.2 times or more to 1.3 times or less the content P1 (% by mass) of the carbon black in mass ratio (Table 1; Column 11, Lines 5-35; Abstract; Column 4, Lines 24-44) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Shirota into the device of Koganehira, for the purpose of forming an image with stably satisfying requirements for characteristics such as feathering, bleeding, a fixing property and color tone (Column 1, Lines 48-54) Regarding claim 7, Shirota discloses wherein the carbon black has a BET specific surface area of 350 m²/g or less (Column 5, Lines 15-30) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Shirota into the device of Koganehira, for the purpose of forming an image with stably satisfying requirements for characteristics such as feathering, bleeding, a fixing property and color tone (Column 1, Lines 48-54) Regarding claim 8, Shirota discloses wherein DBP oil absorption f the carbon black is 180 mL/100 g or less (Column 5, Lines 15-30) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Shirota into the device of Koganehira, for the purpose of forming an image with stably satisfying requirements for characteristics such as feathering, bleeding, a fixing property and color tone (Column 1, Lines 48-54) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-6, 9-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON S UHLENHAKE whose telephone number is (571)272-5916. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas X. Rodriguez can be reached at (571) 431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON S UHLENHAKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853 January 27, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600129
DISCHARGE UNIT, LIQUID DISCHARGE HEAD, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF DISCHARGE UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600140
INKJET PRINTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600130
EJECTION HEAD NOZZLE FLOODING CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600150
RECORDING DEVICE, SERVICE LIFE ESTIMATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600125
LIQUID EJECTION APPARATUS AND LIQUID EJECTION CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (-2.6%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1160 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month