Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/671,917

INK SUPPLYING MECHANISM AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 22, 2024
Examiner
UHLENHAKE, JASON S
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kyocera Document Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
1010 granted / 1160 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Minimal -3% lift
Without
With
+-2.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1201
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1160 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yokota et al (U.S. Pub. 2010/0085396) Regarding claims 1, 7, an ink supplying mechanism comprising: an ink container (102) containing ink An ink tank (120, 130) storing the ink supplied from the ink container to a recording head (50) (Figure 9; Paragraphs 0086, 0096-0097; 0144-0147) A decompressing part (204) decompressing the inside of the ink tank (Figure 9; Paragraphs 0140-0141) A degassing channel (200) circulating the ink flowed out from the ink tank and flowing the ink into the ink tank (Figure 9; Paragraphs 0140-0141); wherein, to the recording head, a plurality of the ink tanks (120, 130) are arranged in parallel (Figure 9) When one ink tank (130) among the plurality of ink tanks is used for printing, in a state that the inside of the other ink tank (120) is decompressed by the decompressing part, the ink inside the other ink tank is circulated by using the degassing channel to perform degassing operation of degassing the ink inside the other ink tank (Figure 9; Paragraphs 0140-0142) Regarding claim 2, a start timing of the degassing operation of the other ink tank is determined on the basis of an ink remaining amount and/or a dissolved oxygen amount of the ink in the one ink tank (Paragraph 0129; when the deaeration level is low, valve 202 opens to allow for ink circulation), and/or the ink remaining amount and/or the dissolved oxygen amount of the ink in the other ink tank (Figure 9; Paragraphs 0140-0142) Regarding claim 4, the ink remaining amount in the one ink tank is measured during printing (Paragraph 0060) Regarding claim 5, the dissolved oxygen amount of the ink in the one ink tank is measured during printing or waiting for printing (Paragraphs 0129-0131) Regarding claim 6, a degassing pump (Figure 9; 128) common to the plurality of ink tanks in the degassing channel; wherein the degassing operation of each of the plurality of ink tanks is performed by using the degassing pump (Figure 9; Paragraph 0147) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yokota et al (U.S. Pub. 2010/0085396) in view of Stockle et al (U.S. Pub. 2019/0143708) Regarding claim 3, Stockle discloses it is known in the art to start timing of the degassing operation of the other ink tank is determined on the basis of a printing frequency of a user (Paragraph 0036; depends on the frequency of the activation of the negative pressure pump, thus depends directly on the quantity of ink that is transported from the supply container into the negative pressure container) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to incorporate the teaching of Stockle into the device of Yokota, for the purpose of reducing the risk of nozzle failures due to gas inclusions Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON S UHLENHAKE whose telephone number is (571)272-5916. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas X. Rodriguez can be reached at (571) 431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON S UHLENHAKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853 December 19, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 22, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600129
DISCHARGE UNIT, LIQUID DISCHARGE HEAD, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF DISCHARGE UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600140
INKJET PRINTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600130
EJECTION HEAD NOZZLE FLOODING CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600150
RECORDING DEVICE, SERVICE LIFE ESTIMATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600125
LIQUID EJECTION APPARATUS AND LIQUID EJECTION CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (-2.6%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1160 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month