Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/672,013

POWER CONVERSION DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 23, 2024
Priority
May 26, 2023 — JP 2023-087185
Examiner
COOK, CORTEZ M
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Yaskawa Denki
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
414 granted / 491 resolved
+16.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
506
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
75.7%
+35.7% vs TC avg
§102
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 491 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to claims filed on 05/23/2024. Claims 1-20 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/28/2024 was filed after the filing date of the application. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ogawa teaches US 20160226409 A1 (Hereinafter “Ogawa”). Regarding Claim 1, Ogawa teaches a power conversion device (Fig. 1) comprising: power conversion circuitry (Fig. 1, 102) configured to supply drive power to an induction motor (Fig. 1, 101); and control circuitry (Fig. 1, 103) configured to: generate a torque command (Fig. 2, torque command); correct the torque command, in response to determining that a magnitude of a primary frequency of the induction motor is less than a lower limit level, so that the magnitude of the primary frequency approaches the lower limit level (Abstract & [0077]); and control the power conversion circuitry to supply the drive power so that the induction motor generates a torque corresponding to the torque command ([0027]). Regarding Claim 2, Ogawa teaches the power conversion device according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry is configured to correct the torque command to accelerate a rotor of the induction motor in a present rotating direction so that the primary frequency approaches the lower limit level ([0032]-[0334]). Regarding Claim 3, Ogawa teaches the power conversion device according to claim 1, wherein the control circuitry is further configured to: determine the lower limit level based on a lower limit profile and the torque command before correction, the lower limit profile being defined in advance to represent a relationship between the torque command and the lower limit level ([0031]); and correct the torque command based on the determined lower limit level (Fig. 2, the adder between 201 & 204). Regarding Claim 19, Ogawa teaches a method of controlling power conversion circuitry (Fig. 1, 102) configured to supply drive power to an induction motor (Fig. 1, 101), the method comprising: generating a torque command (Fig. 2, torque command) for the induction motor; correcting the torque command, when a magnitude of a primary frequency of the induction motor falls below a lower limit level that is predetermined, so that the magnitude of the primary frequency approaches the lower limit level (Abstract & [0077]); and controlling the power conversion circuitry so that the induction motor generates a torque corresponding to the torque command ([0027]). Regarding Claim 20, Ogawa teaches the method according to claim 19, wherein said correcting the torque command include correcting the torque command to accelerate a rotor of the induction motor in a present rotating direction so that the primary frequency approaches the lower limit level ([0032]-[0334]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 15-18 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: determine, in response to determining that a magnitude of a primary frequency of the induction motor approaches zero, a target frequency having an inverse sign to a sign of the primary frequency; correct a magnetic flux command so as to reduce a deviation between the target frequency and the primary frequency; and control the power conversion circuitry so that the induction motor generates a secondary magnetic flux corresponding to the magnetic flux command. Claims 4-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Okubo US 6515442 B1 teaches when the absolute value of the position deviation signal is greater than a reference value, the torque corrective gain is set to zero and when the absolute value of the position deviation signal changes to be equal to the reference value or below, the torque corrective gain is changed from zero to a constant value, or in the section for torque corrective gain changeover evaluation, when the absolute value of the position deviation signal is greater than a reference value, the torque corrective gain is set to zero and when the absolute value of the position deviation signal changes to be equal to the reference value or below, the torque corrective gain is continuously changed from zero to a constant value. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CORTEZ M COOK whose telephone number is (571)270-7954. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7:30-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon-Santana can be reached at 571-272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CORTEZ M COOK/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2846
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 11, 2026
Interview Requested
May 21, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 21, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640674
FEEDBACK CURRENT CONTROL OF INDUCTION MACHINES
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12620891
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THREE CHANNEL GALVANIC ISOLATOR FOR INVERTER FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620828
BATTERY TEMPERATURE BASED TOOL POWER REDUCTION
2y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12615001
SYSTEMS FOR LOW INDUCTANCE FULL BRIDGE POWER MODULE FOR INVERTER
2y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12603593
MOTOR CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+7.9%)
2y 1m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 491 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month