Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/672,085

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING CELL LEVEL MOBILITY IN MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 23, 2024
Priority
Jun 12, 2023 — RE 1020230074661
Examiner
HENSON, JAMAAL R
Art Unit
2411
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Soenghun KIM
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
685 granted / 811 resolved
+26.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
867
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
70.7%
+30.7% vs TC avg
§102
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 811 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim(s) 1-12 and in particular claims 1 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 12 recite, in part: “wherein the first timing advance number is: related to time period required for uplink and downlink switching; and determined based on the first parameter for timing advance” With regard to the first timing advance number the specification as filed recites, in part: [0477] “The first timing-advance-number is indicated by a timing-advance-information in layer3 control information (TARGET_TIMING_ADVNACE in RRC message) or by a timing-advance-information in layer2 control information (timing-advance-command in random-access-response) [0754] Terminal determines the type of the reconfiguration based on presence of a first timing-advance-number information [0757] If the first timing-advance-number information (TARGET_TIMING_ADVNACE) is not included in the RRC message, the terminal performs the first type reconfiguration. [0758] If the first timing-advance-number information is included in the RRC message, the terminal performs the second type reconfiguration. [0759] The first timing-advance-number is determined based on the timing-advance-command received in a layer2-control-information if the first type reconfiguration is applied. [0760] The first timing-advance-number is determined based on the first timing-advance-number information if the second reconfiguration is applied.” The specification does not recite: “wherein the first timing advance number is: related to time period required for uplink and downlink switching; and determined based on the first parameter for timing advance” It is unclear how the Target_Timing_Advance relates to uplink and downlink switching when the specification states that the Target_timing_advance relates to uplink synchronization. Thus the claims are rejected. Additionally the claims recite, in part: “receiving by the terminal a Radio Resource Control (RRC) message for cell level mobility, wherein the RRC message comprises: a first parameter for timing advance and a second parameter for timing advance; or the first parameter for timing advance and no second parameter for timing advance; determining by the terminal whether to perform a first type cell level mobility or a second type cell level mobility; and performing by the terminal the first type of cell level mobility in a case that the RRC message comprises the second parameter for timing advance”. The claims appear to contradict the specification. The specification recites, in part: “[0757] If the first timing-advance-number information (TARGET_TIMING_ADVNACE) is not included in the RRC message, the terminal performs the first type reconfiguration. [0758] If the first timing-advance-number information is included in the RRC message, the terminal performs the second type reconfiguration.” The first timing advance number is based on the first parameter for timing advance, and the claims state that a first parameter is sent in the RRC message whether the second parameter for timing advance is transmitted or not, see the above: “a first parameter for timing advance and a second parameter for timing advance; or The first parameter for timing advance and no second parameter for timing advance” The specification states that when the first timing advance number is not included in the RRC message, the terminal performs the first type configuration. The claims are directed to the first type of cell level mobility, which is the “type of reconfiguration” as discussed in the specification. The specification states that the “first type of reconfiguration” is performed when the “first-timing-advance-number” is not included in the RRC message (e.g. the RRC Reconfiguration message), thus, how does the UE perform the first type of reconfiguration when the UE receives first-timing-advance-number which is derived from a first parameter for timing advance which is always sent to the UE based on the claim language, when the specification states that first type of reconfiguration (e.g. first type cell level mobility) when the UE receives the first parameter in each instance of the RRC message transmission from the network. Additionally the specification at par.[0478] recites, in part: “[0478] The second timing-advance-number is either explicitly indicated in RRC message (within SPECIAL_CELL_CONFIGURATION) or determined based on duplex mode (TDD or FDD) of the target special cell (if not explicitly indicated). The purpose of second timing-advance-number is to provide the time period for uplink and downlink switching in TDD. The purpose of second timing-advance-number is to provide the time period required for coexistence of NR and LTE. The second timing-advance-number is either 0 or 625 or 25600.” As can be seen, it would appear that the second timing advance number is related to uplink/downlink switching and derived from a second parameter for timing advance, and not the first parameter for timing advance as claimed. Thus there appears to be a number of deficiencies in the claims as it relates to the specification as filed such that the specification as filed does not satisfy the written description requirement, and thus, the claims are rejected for the reasons given above. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Kim et al. (US 2024/0147328 A1) “Cell Switching” Ly et al. (US 2022/0014982 A1) “Random Access Chang (RACH)-Less Timing Advance Determination” Wallentin et al. (WO 2024/2322804 A1) “Indicating LTM Candidate After Execution” Orsino et al. (WO 2024/209344 A1) “Random Access Channel-Less Procedure for Mobile Integrated Access and Backhaul” Ofinno “An Introduction to Lower-Layer Triggered Mobility (LTM)” dated March 2023 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMAAL HENSON whose telephone number is (571)272-5339. The examiner can normally be reached M-Thu: 7:30 am - 6:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Derrick Ferris can be reached at (571)272-3123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAMAAL HENSON Primary Examiner Art Unit 2411 /JAMAAL HENSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2411
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684485
ENHANCED WAKE-UP SIGNAL HANDLING
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676718
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION REPORT IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677348
DISCONTINUOUS RECEPTION DETERMINING METHOD AND DEVICE, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12659855
METHOD OF PERFORMING A POWER SAVING OPERATION AND RELATED DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652655
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR NODE USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+3.9%)
2y 4m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 811 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month