Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/672,214

RECEIVER DEFENSE USING CLEAR-TO-SEND ACKNOWLEDGMENT FRAMES

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 23, 2024
Examiner
HENSON, JAMAAL R
Art Unit
2411
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Infineon Technologies AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
696 granted / 825 resolved
+26.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
875
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§103
45.4%
+5.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§112
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 825 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. For example, claim 1, recites, in part: “determining whether a channel-access period specified by the RTS frame exceeds a remaining on-channel time for a wireless band……….; and in response to the channel-access period of the RTS frame exceeding the remaining on-channel time” As the claim initially recited, “a remaining on-channel time for a wireless band” it is unclear what the “the remaining on-channel time is referring to”. The office recommends amending the claim to recite: “in response to the channel-access period of the RTS frame exceeding the remaining on-channel time for the wireless band”. Claim 2-8 which depend on claim 1 are similarly rejected for their dependency on claim 1 and for failing to cure the deficiencies therein. Claim 9, recites: “detecting that an on-channel time period of the first wireless band is within a predetermined period of ending; and in response to the detecting…..” The claims are indefinite because “the detecting” is not specified in the claim. The office requires the amendment of the claim to “in response to the detecting that the on-channel time period of the wireless band is within the predetermined period of ending” in order to render the claims definite. Claims 10-12 are rejected for their dependency on claim 9 and for failing to cure the deficiencies therein. Claim 13 is parallel in scope with claim 1 but directed to a device, and is rejected for the same reasons as given for claim 1. The office notes that claims 14-20 are rejected for their dependency on claim 13, and for failing to cure the deficiencies therein. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Benveniste (US 7, 688,783 B1) “Mixing Basic Service Set (BSS) Traffic and Mesh Forwarding Traffic” Li et al. (US 2013/0272288 A1) “Transmission Method and Device in Wireless Local Area Network” Wu (US 2016/0323776 A1) “Channel Reservation Method and Communication Device” Jiang et al. (US 2020/0132829 A1) “Methods of Ranging for Next Generation Vehicle-to-Everything (NGV) Systems” par.[0137] describes an AP transmitting a CTS-2-Self to itself in order to reserve the channel for itself. Geethanjali (US 2020/0214039 A1) “Increasing Downstream Network Throughput From Access Points in Data Communication System Using Transmit Opportunities From RTS (Request to Send) Frame Errors” Ciochine et al. (US 2022/0174725 A1) “Communication Devices and Methods” Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMAAL HENSON whose telephone number is (571)272-5339. The examiner can normally be reached M-Thu: 7:30 am - 6:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Derrick Ferris can be reached at (571)272-3123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAMAAL HENSON Primary Examiner Art Unit 2411 /JAMAAL HENSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2411
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 25, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750870
METHOD AND DEVICE USED FOR RELAY WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745320
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REDUCING PACKET LOSS DURING A MULTICAST AND BROADCAST SERVICE SESSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739815
APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733066
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING TIMER, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726962
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING CAPABILITY OF USER EQUIPMENT
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+4.3%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 825 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month